IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/engenv/v35y2024i3p1456-1478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulations on carbon neutrality in China: New evidence based on the spatial measurement model

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanhua Yang
  • Zhongwen Peng
  • Dengli Tang

Abstract

Identifying the differentiated effects of different environmental regulations is the basis for promoting China's zero carbon emissions and carbon neutrality. We used Chinese provincial panel data from 2003 to 2017 to empirically test the impact of different environmental regulations on carbon neutrality through spatial measurement models. The highlights of the study are as follows: (1) Environmental regulations exert significant impact on carbon emissions, but different types of environmental regulations exert significantly different effect on carbon emissions. Public participation environmental regulation has a control effect on regional carbon emissions, while command-based and market-based environmental regulations had no significant effect on regional carbon neutrality. (2) The heterogeneity of the impact of different types of environmental regulations on carbon emissions can also be identified from the regional impacts heterogeneity and lags impact heterogeneity. (3) The combined mandatory and market-based environmental regulations and the combined mandatory and public-participatory environmental regulations significantly inhibited regional carbon neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanhua Yang & Zhongwen Peng & Dengli Tang, 2024. "The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulations on carbon neutrality in China: New evidence based on the spatial measurement model," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(3), pages 1456-1478, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:1456-1478
    DOI: 10.1177/0958305X221140578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X221140578
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0958305X221140578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:engenv:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:1456-1478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.