IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2015_num_477_1_10535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quels liens les bénéficiaires de contrats aidés entretiennent-ils avec le marché du travail ? Une description à partir du Panel 2008

Author

Listed:
  • Isabelle Benoteau
  • Véronique Rémy

Abstract

[fre] Cet article décrit les relations que les bénéficiaires de contrats aidés entretiennent à différents égards avec le marché du travail : parcours professionnel avant et après l’entrée en dispositif, perception de leur positionnement sur ce marché (atouts pour retrouver un emploi, critère d’acceptation d’un poste, relation au travail, etc.), ou opinion sur les contrats aidés. Les données mobilisées sont celles du Panel 2008, enquête de la Dares qui porte sur les bénéficiaires d’un contrat aidé du Plan de cohésion sociale (CIE, CAE, CAV et CI‑RMA). En tant qu’outil d’évaluation, cette enquête contient beaucoup d’informations destinées à capter finement les caractéristiques des bénéficiaires, et notamment leurs liens avec le marché du travail. Le profil de ces bénéficiaires peut être analysé précisément, y compris selon le secteur de recrutement, tout comme le déroulement de leur contrat aidé (durée, accompagnement et formation associés, etc.). Cette étude propose en particulier une typologie des bénéficiaires selon les caractéristiques de leur contrat. Celle-ci met en exergue la diversité du ciblage des contrats aidés, depuis un suivi renforcé pour les personnes en grande difficulté jusqu’à des contrats marchands proches d’emploi réguliers pour les personnes les moins éloignées du marché du travail. Sont ensuite présentés des éléments descriptifs sur les trajectoires des bénéficiaires selon la nature de leur contrat aidé. L’étude montre que l’insertion professionnelle des bénéficiaires six mois après la fin de leur contrat aidé n’est pas indépendante du déroulement de leur contrat aidé et des caractéristiques de leur employeur. Leur appréciation du marché du travail varie également avec leur distance à l’emploi. Ces résultats sont mis en perspective avec le regard, généralement positif, que les bénéficiaires portent sur les contrats aidés, en particulier sur leur propre expérience de ces contrats, offrant ainsi un éclairage complémentaire sur leur utilité.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabelle Benoteau & Véronique Rémy, 2015. "Quels liens les bénéficiaires de contrats aidés entretiennent-ils avec le marché du travail ? Une description à partir du Panel 2008," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 477(1), pages 53-83.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2015_num_477_1_10535
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2015.10535
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2015.10535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2015.10535
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2015_num_477_1_10535
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2015.10535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Lechner & Conny Wunsch, 2009. "Active labour market policy in East Germany," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 17(4), pages 661-702, October.
    2. Michael Lechner, 2002. "Program Heterogeneity And Propensity Score Matching: An Application To The Evaluation Of Active Labor Market Policies," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(2), pages 205-220, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Biewen & Bernd Fitzenberger & Aderonke Osikominu & Marie Paul, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Public-Sponsored Training Revisited: The Importance of Data and Methodological Choices," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(4), pages 837-897.
    2. Andrea Pufahl & Christoph R. Weiss, 2009. "Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: results from propensity score matching," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 36(1), pages 79-101, March.
    3. Luis Aguiar & Jörg Claussen & Christian Peukert, 2018. "Catch Me If You Can: Effectiveness and Consequences of Online Copyright Enforcement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 656-678, September.
    4. Amarendra Sharma, 2019. "Indira Awas Yojana and Housing Adequacy: An Evaluation using Propensity Score Matching," ASARC Working Papers 2019-05, The Australian National University, Australia South Asia Research Centre.
    5. Peter Grajzl & Stjepan Srhoj & Jaka Cepec & Barbara Mörec, 2024. "A by-product of big government: the attenuating role of public procurement for the effectiveness of grants-based entrepreneurship policy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 895-916, March.
    6. Michael Lechner & Ruth Miquel & Conny Wunsch, 2011. "Long‐Run Effects Of Public Sector Sponsored Training In West Germany," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 742-784, August.
    7. Michael Gerfin & Michael Lechner, 2002. "A Microeconometric Evaluation of the Active Labour Market Policy in Switzerland," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(482), pages 854-893, October.
    8. Richard Disney & Eleonora Fischera & Trudy Owens, 2010. "Has the Introduction of Microfinance Crowded-out Informal Loans in Malawi?," Discussion Papers 10/08, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    9. Caloffi, Annalisa & Freo, Marzia & Ghinoi, Stefano & Mariani, Marco & Rossi, Federica, 2022. "Assessing the effects of a deliberate policy mix: The case of technology and innovation advisory services and innovation vouchers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    10. Sourafel Girma & Holger Görg, 2022. "Productivity effects of processing and ordinary export market entry: A time‐varying treatments approach," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 836-853, August.
    11. Hämäläinen, Kari & Ollikainen, Virve, 2004. "Differential Effects of Active Labour Market Programmes in the Early Stages of Young People's Unemployment," Research Reports 115, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    12. Reize, Frank, 2000. "Leaving unemployment for self-employment: a discrete duration analysis of determinants and stability of self-employment among former unemployed," ZEW Discussion Papers 00-26, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    13. Chiputwa, Brian & Spielman, David J. & Qaim, Matin, 2015. "Food Standards, Certification, and Poverty among Coffee Farmers in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 400-412.
    14. Marc FERRACCI & Grégory JOLIVET & Gerard J van den Berg, 2009. "Treatment Evaluation in the Case of Interaction Within Markets," Working Papers 2009-22, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    15. Ji, Sisi & Zhu, Zheyi, 2022. "Does higher education matter for health?," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2022/4, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section.
    16. Tobias Schmidt & Julia Le Blanc, 2017. "Do homeowners save more? – Evidence from the Panel on Household Finances (PHF)," ERES eres2017_110, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    17. Sakos, Grayson & Cerulli, Giovanni & Garbero, Alessandra, 2021. "Beyond the ATE: Idiosyncratic Effect Estimation to Uncover Distributional Impacts Results from 17 Impact Evaluations," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314017, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Yongliang Yang & Jin Wen & Yi Li, 2020. "The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure on the Firm Value of Listed Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, February.
    19. Lechner, Michael & Wunsch, Conny & Huber, Martin & Walter, Thomas, 2009. "Do German Welfare-to-Work Programmes Reduce Welfare and Increase Work?," CEPR Discussion Papers 7238, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Uysal, S. Derya, 2013. "Doubly Robust Estimation of Causal Effects with Multivalued Treatments," Economics Series 297, Institute for Advanced Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2015_num_477_1_10535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.