IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2012y2012i1id330p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Idealization and exemplification as tools of philosophy

Author

Listed:
  • Tommi Lehtonen

Abstract

Imaginary stories and thought experiments are often used in philosophy to clarify, exemplify, and provide evidence or counterevidence for abstract ideas and principles. Stories and thought experiments can illustrate abstract ideas and can test their credibility, or, at least, so it is claimed. As a by-product, stories and thought experiments bring literary, and even entertaining, elements into philosophy. Even a short survey of philosophical literature quickly shows that idealization and exemplification are the main approaches in the use of thought experiments. The aim of idealizations is to conceptualize and condense the central or relevant aspects of complex realities and to make those conceptualizations testable in the "laboratory of the mind." What aspects are considered relevant depends on the point of view and the aim of the discussion. The aim of exemplifications is to make tangible and justify abstract ideas. Problems with idealization and exemplification include the risk of the loss of information on the one hand and the risk of too much irrelevant information on the other. This paper examines and evaluates these and other risks related to the use of imaginary stories and thought experiments in philosophy.

Suggested Citation

  • Tommi Lehtonen, 2012. "Idealization and exemplification as tools of philosophy," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(1), pages 1-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2012:y:2012:i:1:id:330:p:1-15
    DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.330.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.330.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.e-logos.330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2012:y:2012:i:1:id:330:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.