IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v17y2019i3d10.1007_s10308-019-00555-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Japan-EU relations after World War II and strategic partnership

Author

Listed:
  • Yuko Hosoi

    (Takushoku University
    Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence for EU Studies at Keio University)

Abstract

Japan and the EU formally agreed on the outline of The Japan-EU Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) and the Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) on 7 July 2017 and finalized on 17 July 2018. Despite such major shifts in the relationship between Japan and Europe, it is unfortunately true that Japanese society does not have a high level of interest in establishing a cooperative relationship or negotiating agreements such as the SPA with the EU, in fields other than economics. However, this low level of interest does not mean that strengthening a political relationship with the EU is unimportant. Rather, confirming that Japan and the EU share the basic values promoted by the SPA is even more important now than it was in 2011, when both leaders decided to initiate SPA and EPA negotiations. The international order—based on values such as liberty, democracy, the rule of law, human rights, the market economy, and free trade—which has been built up by Western countries, including Japan, since the end of the Second World War, is being challenged not only by emerging countries such as China but also by the Trump Administration in the United States. Japan-Europe relations after World War II have historically been dominated by economic friction, especially in the 1960s–1980s. But the experiences involved in resolving the economic friction enabled the relations to evolve from economic interests to the other area. There was a qualitative transformation of the relationship between Japan and Europe in the 1990s. This paper assesses the importance of cooperation with the EU for Japan in the twenty-first century.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuko Hosoi, 2019. "Japan-EU relations after World War II and strategic partnership," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 295-307, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:17:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10308-019-00555-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-019-00555-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10308-019-00555-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-019-00555-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sae Won Chung & Ben Tonra, 2023. "EU-Korea security cooperation: a new normative partnership?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 507-525, December.
    2. Sunghoon Park, 2019. "EU’s strategic partnership with Asian countries: an introductory article for the special issue," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 257-263, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Viggo Jakobsen, 2009. "Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 81-102, January.
    2. Luuk Middelaar, 2016. "The Return of Politics – The European Union after the crises in the eurozone and Ukraine," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 495-507, May.
    3. Loredana SIMIONOV, 2021. "European Union's pursuit of resilience in the Eastern Neighbourhood," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12(4), pages 257-266, February.
    4. Haddadi, Said, 2004. "Political Securitisation and Democratisation in the Maghreb: Ambiguous Discourses and Fine-tuning Practices for a Security Partnership," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt8qm646tx, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    5. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    6. Ileana Daniela Serban, 2021. "The European Union: From a Complex Adaptive System to a Policy Interpreter," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 388-403, March.
    7. Alex Warleigh-Lack & Ben Rosamond, 2010. "Across the EU Studies-New Regionalism Frontier: Invitation to a Dialogue," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 993-1013, September.
    8. Tereza Novotná & Thomas Christiansen & Moosung Lee, 2023. "EU-Korea relations at 60: managing cooperation in the context of great power rivalry," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 481-492, December.
    9. Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2009. "Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism - The EU as a Model of Regional Integration," KFG Working Papers p0007, Free University Berlin.
    10. Yeikyoung Kim, 2016. "The European Union, regional integration, and conflict transformation in the South China Sea territorial disputes," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 383-399, December.
    11. James Rogers, 2009. "From ‘Civilian Power’ to ‘Global Power’: Explicating the European Union's ‘Grand Strategy’ Through the Articulation of Discourse Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 831-862, September.
    12. Henrik Larsen, 2020. "Normative Power Europe or Capability–expectations Gap? The Performativity of Concepts in the Study of European Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 962-977, July.
    13. Adler, Emanuel & Crawford, Beverly, 2004. "Normative Power: The European Practice of Region Building and the Case of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP)," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt6xx6n5p4, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    14. Mohamed Limam & Raffaella A. Del Sarto, 2015. "Periphery under Pressure: Morocco, Tunisia and the European Union’s Mobility Partnership on Migration," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/75, European University Institute.
    15. Anand Menon, 2014. "The JCMS Annual Review Lecture Divided and Declining? Europe in a Changing World," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52, pages 5-24, November.
    16. Johannes Jarlebring, 2023. "Blacklisting and the EU as a Global Regulator: The Institutionally Predisposed Norm Breaker," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1007-1025, July.
    17. Eloi Laurent & Jacques Le Cacheux, 2010. "The EU as a global ecological power: The logics of marketintegration," Working Papers hal-01880678, HAL.
    18. Matti Minkkinen & Markus Philipp Zimmer & Matti Mäntymäki, 2023. "Co-Shaping an Ecosystem for Responsible AI: Five Types of Expectation Work in Response to a Technological Frame," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 103-121, February.
    19. Lucy Corkin, 2011. "Redefining Foreign Policy Impulses toward Africa: The Roles of the MFA, the MOFCOM and China Exim Bank," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 40(4), pages 61-90.
    20. Helmut K. Anheier & Robert Falkner & Lisa Haferlach & Dilek Kurban, 2017. "Lessons Learnt from the EU-Turkey Refugee Agreement in Guiding EU Migration Partnerships with Origin and Transit Countries," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(s4), pages 85-93, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:17:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10308-019-00555-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.