IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/bmr111/v5y2016i2p31-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional Versus Online Learning in Institutions of Higher Education: Minority Business Students¡¯ Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Falih M. Alsaaty
  • Ella Carter
  • David Abrahams
  • Faleh Alshameri

Abstract

For decades, scholars have debated which mode of education is superior. Some argue that online is superior and others argue that online is less effective than traditional face-to-face courses. Still others suggest that the hybrid mode (e.g., online blended with face-to-face lectures) is the most desired and productive content delivery method for students. However, students¡¯ perceptions towards online learning as compared to traditional face-to-face learning have largely been overlooked. This paper intends to fill this void in the literature and explore minority students¡¯ perceptions towards online learning versus traditional face-to-face modes of education in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Falih M. Alsaaty & Ella Carter & David Abrahams & Faleh Alshameri, 2016. "Traditional Versus Online Learning in Institutions of Higher Education: Minority Business Students¡¯ Perceptions," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 31-41, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:31-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/download/9597/5817
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/view/9597
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antony Young, 2014. "1 + 1 = 3," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Brand Media Strategy, edition 0, chapter 0, pages 81-99, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. David J. Deming & Claudia Goldin & Lawrence F. Katz, 2012. "The For-Profit Postsecondary School Sector: Nimble Critters or Agile Predators?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(1), pages 139-164, Winter.
    3. Cassandra DiRienzo & Gregory Lilly, 2014. "Online Versus Face-To-Face: Does Delivery Method Matter For Undergraduate Business School Learning?," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11.
    4. Oecd, 2015. "Teaching with technology," Teaching in Focus 12, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudiu Coman & Laurențiu Gabriel Țîru & Luiza Meseșan-Schmitz & Carmen Stanciu & Maria Cristina Bularca, 2020. "Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Justyna Berniak-Wozny & Malgorzata Rataj & Marlena Plebanska, 2021. "The Impact of Learning Mode on Student Satisfaction with Teaching Quality: Evaluation of Academic Staff Teaching before and during Covid-19," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 722-738.
    3. Vasile Gherheș & Claudia E. Stoian & Marcela Alina Fărcașiu & Miroslav Stanici, 2021. "E-Learning vs. Face-To-Face Learning: Analyzing Students’ Preferences and Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Fu-Hsuan Chen, 2021. "Sustainable Education through E-Learning: The Case Study of iLearn2.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darolia, Rajeev, 2013. "Integrity versus access? The effect of federal financial aid availability on postsecondary enrollment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 101-114.
    2. Manna, Ester, 2013. "Mixed Duopoly with Motivated Teachers," MPRA Paper 52041, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Jordan Klimek & Julia Anna Klimek, 2021. "Management of the Teaching Process in Higher Education in COVID-19 Pandemic: Socio-Cultural and Economic Aspects," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 737-752.
    4. Jenny Saxton & Simone N Rodda & Natalia Booth & Stephanie S Merkouris & Nicki A Dowling, 2021. "The efficacy of Personalized Normative Feedback interventions across addictions: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Shikuo Chen & Chenhui Wei & Tianhong Yang & Wancheng Zhu & Honglei Liu & Pathegama Gamage Ranjith, 2018. "Three-Dimensional Numerical Investigation of Coupled Flow-Stress-Damage Failure Process in Heterogeneous Poroelastic Rocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Jeffrey T. Denning & Eric R. Eide & Kevin J. Mumford & Richard W. Patterson & Merrill Warnick, 2022. "Why Have College Completion Rates Increased?," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 1-29, July.
    7. Melor Md Yunus & Ashairi Suliman & Law Szee Huei & Ting Fang Kai & Stephanie Kiew, 2020. "The Use of Voca-Lens to Enhance the Students Vocabulary Repertoire," International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(3), pages 172-184, September.
    8. Gugu Ndawo, 2019. "Nurse Educators’ Experiences Regarding Subject Competence at a Nursing College," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 138-138, April.
    9. Rajeev Darolia, 2013. "Student Loan Repayment and College Accountability," Consumer Finance Institute discussion papers 13-5, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    10. Helmuth Cremer & Dario Maldonado, 2013. "Mixed oligopoly in education," Documentos de Trabajo 10500, Universidad del Rosario.
    11. Nadia Zrelli & Imene Berguiga & Ali Abdallah & Philippe Adair, 2017. "Risques spécifiques et profitabilité des banques islamiques en région MENA," Post-Print hal-01667423, HAL.
    12. Ogden, Joan & Jaffe, Amy Myers & Scheitrum, Daniel & McDonald, Zane & Miller, Marshall, 2018. "Natural gas as a bridge to hydrogen transportation fuel: Insights from the literature," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 317-329.
    13. Ziad R. Ghandour, 2019. "Public-Private Competition in Regulated Markets," NIPE Working Papers 02/2019, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    14. Joselynn Hawkins Fountain, 2019. "The Effect of the Gainful Employment Regulatory Uncertainty on Student Enrollment at For-Profit Institutions of Higher Education," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(8), pages 1065-1089, December.
    15. Alina Evstigneeva & Mark Sidorovskiy, 2021. "Assessment of Clarity of Bank of Russia Monetary Policy Communication by Neural Network Approach," Russian Journal of Money and Finance, Bank of Russia, vol. 80(3), pages 3-33, September.
    16. Kirkebøen, Lars & Leuven, Edwin & Mogstad, Magne, 2014. "Field of Study, Earnings, and Self-Selection," Memorandum 29/2014, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    17. Yehui Tong & Zelia Serrasqueiro, 2020. "The Influential Factors on Capital Structure: A Study on Portuguese High Technology and Medium-High Technology Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(4), pages 23-35, July.
    18. Pelly, Diane & Daly, Michael & Delaney, Liam & Doyle, Orla, 2022. "Worker stress, burnout, and wellbeing before and during the COVID-19 restrictions in the United Kingdom," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115098, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Mueller, Holger M. & Yannelis, Constantine, 2019. "The rise in student loan defaults," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 1-19.
    20. Francine D. Blau & Anne E. Winkler, 2017. "Women, Work, and Family," NBER Working Papers 23644, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:31-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Lee (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://bmr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.