IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/eurint/y2020v7p189-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Contribution Of Cohesion Policy In The „Lower Danube” Euroregion: The Mapping Of The Implemented Projects’ Outputs And Their Implication To Transition For Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina CORNEA

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati)

Abstract

Through its programmes, the European Union supports Euroregions so as to help develop joint projects, meant to enforce the economic and social cohesion. Do these programmes of the Cohesion Policy also support the transition processes towards sustainability? This study examines this aspect, by achieving an overall image of the results of the projects implemented in the "Lower Danube" Euro-region. This work uses the method of mapping the results in order to understand the way in which the cohesion policy supports the Euroregions in terms of territorial cohesion and durable development. Therefore, there are roughly analysed the types of results which prevail and their implications in ensuring the sustainability. This method can be adapted for other territorial structures (towns, regions etc) so as to appreciate the transition towards sustainability of the studied territory. The financial support for ensuring the territorial and social cohesion needs to be rethought depending on the potential and social-economical characteristics of the region

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina CORNEA, 2020. "The Contribution Of Cohesion Policy In The „Lower Danube” Euroregion: The Mapping Of The Implemented Projects’ Outputs And Their Implication To Transition For Sustainability," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7, pages 189-208.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2020:v:7:p:189-208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurint.uaic.ro/proceedings/articles/EURINT2020_COR.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pablo PODADERA RIVERA & Francisco J. CALDERÓN VÁZQUEZ, 2019. "Rethinking the territorial cohesion in the EU: institutional and functional elements of the concept," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10, pages 41-62, December.
    2. James Wesley Scott, 1999. "European and North American Contexts for Cross-border Regionalism," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 605-617.
    3. Joanna Kurowska-Pysz & Rui Alexandre Castanho & Luís Loures, 2018. "Sustainable Planning of Cross-Border Cooperation: A Strategy for Alliances in Border Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Markus Perkmann, 1999. "Building Governance Institutions Across European Borders," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 657-667.
    5. Łukasz Wróblewski & Andrzej Kasperek, 2019. "Euroregion as an Entity Stimulating the Sustainable Development of the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services in a City Divided by a Border," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Romeo Victor Ionescu & Monica Laura Zlati & Valentin Marian Antohi & Silvius Stanciu, 2018. "Reduced Inequalities as Factor of Sustainable Development: The Analysis Under Econometric Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Todd Hataley & Christian Leuprecht, 2018. "Determinants of Cross-Border Cooperation," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 317-328, July.
    8. Zsolt Darvas & Jan Mazza & Catarina Midões, 2019. "How to improve European Union cohesion policy for the next decade," Policy Contributions 30670, Bruegel.
    9. Thierstein, Alain & Walser, Manfred, 1999. "Sustainable regional development: interplay of topdown and bottom-up approaches," ERSA conference papers ersa99pa139, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Annekatrin Niebuhr, 2008. "The impact of EU enlargement on European border regions," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 163-186.
    11. Christiane Krieger-Boden, 2018. "What Direction Should EU Cohesion Policy Take?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 19(01), pages 10-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. lain Deas & Alex Lord, 2006. "From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(10), pages 1847-1877, September.
    2. Arno van der Zwet & Irene McMaster & John Bachtler, 2012. "Governance approaches in European territorial cooperation programmes and the implications of macro-regional strategies," ERSA conference papers ersa12p337, European Regional Science Association.
    3. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 593-604.
    4. Lundquist, Karl-Johan & Trippl, Michaela, 2009. "Towards Cross-Border Innovation Spaces. A theoretical analysis and empirical comparison of the Öresund region and the Centrope area," SRE-Discussion Papers 2009/05, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    5. Bufon Milan, 2011. "Cross-Border Policies and Spatial and Social Integration: Between Challenges and Problems," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 18(2), pages 29-45, November.
    6. Michaela Trippl, 2006. "Cross-Border Regional Innovation Systems," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2006_05, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    7. Dołzbłasz Sylwia, 2013. "Cross-Border Co-Operation in the Euroregions at the Polish-Czech and Polish-Slovak Borders," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 102-114, June.
    8. Michaela Trippl, 2010. "Developing Cross‐Border Regional Innovation Systems: Key Factors And Challenges," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 101(2), pages 150-160, April.
    9. Junxi Qian & Xueqiong Tang, 2019. "Theorising small city as ordinary city: Rethinking development and urbanism from China’s south-west frontier," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(6), pages 1215-1233, May.
    10. Halyna LYTVYN & Andriy TYUSHKA, 2020. "Rethinking the Governance-Governmentality-Governability nexus at the EU's Eastern Frontiers: the Carpathian Euroregion 2.0 and the future of EU-Ukrainian Cross-Border cooperation," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 146-183, November.
    11. Peter Mayerhofer, 2006. "A Change in Location Advantages in Austria since the Opening of Eastern Europe. On Developments of the Austrian Location Pattern since 1990," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 11(3), pages 125-137, September.
    12. Arie Stoffelen & Dominique Vanneste, 2017. "Tourism and cross-border regional development: insights in European contexts," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 1013-1033, June.
    13. Pallagst, Karina & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2022. "Theories of cross-border cooperation: Explanatory approaches from European integration, regionalism and governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: The future viability of cross-border cooperation, volume 33, pages 33-45, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    14. Grzegorz Drozdowski, 2021. "Economic Calculus Qua an Instrument to Support Sustainable Development under Increasing Risk," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    15. Szabolcs Szanyi, 2012. ""A Szatmár-Beregi sík természeti értékei" - Tervezet egy nemzetközi bioszféra rezervátum kialakítására," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 9(1), pages 56-64.
    16. Odile Heddebaut, 2015. "Has the construction of the Channel tunnel been a factor of rapprochement of the cities of Calais and Dover and of their respective regions?," Post-Print hal-01355614, HAL.
    17. Irena Medar-Tanjga & Neda Živak & Anđelija Ivkov-Džigurski & Vesna Rajčević & Tanja Mišlicki Tomić & Vukosava Čolić, 2022. "Drina Transboundary Biosphere Reserve—Opportunities and Challenges of Sustainable Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    18. NELLES Jennifer, 2011. "Cooperation in Crisis? An Analysis of Cross-Border Intermunicipal Relations in the Detroit-Windsor Region," LISER Working Paper Series 2011-30, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    19. Lóránt Bali, 2012. "A horvát-magyar határ menti együttműködés főbb aspektusai és leképeződései Barcs és Zala megye példáján," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 9(1), pages 53-55.
    20. János Pénzes & Gergely Tagai, 2012. "The potential Effects of the "melting" of state borders on the border areas of Hungary," Eszak-magyarorszagi Strategiai Fuzetek, Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 9(1), pages 5-18.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2020:v:7:p:189-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.