IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/eurint/y2015v2p92-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Convergence In European Emerging Polities: A Content Analysis On Selected Cross-Border Cooperation Structure

Author

Listed:
  • Valentin COJANU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Alexandru GAVRIS

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Raluca POPESCU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

The paper starts from the hypothesis that the viability of emerging territorial units depends on the way their members reach a converging approach towards issues of common concern. Based on previous results, we rank ten selected cross-border cooperation structures (CBCS) according to their institutional strength as a measure of assessment of their viability as polity. Data are then collected for each CBCS for three areas of cooperation, i.e. economy, society, and environment, in the form of policy documents. The analysis uses text mining techniques to explore the content of documents on each selected region and on each areas of cooperation. The results are further explored inside a thematic mapping of clusters, which is analysed through content analysis. The goal is to investigate and assess what is the cross-border cooperation level of policy convergence inside EU selected case studies, based on the emerging themes.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentin COJANU & Alexandru GAVRIS & Raluca POPESCU, 2015. "Policy Convergence In European Emerging Polities: A Content Analysis On Selected Cross-Border Cooperation Structure," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 2, pages 92-111.
  • Handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2015:v:2:p:92-111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cse.uaic.ro/eurint/proceedings/index_htm_files/EURINT2015_COJ.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sven Arndt, 2006. "Regional currency arrangements in North America," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 265-280, December.
    2. Valentin COJANU & Raluca ROBU, 2014. "An Evaluation Of Institutional Strength Of Cross-Border Cooperation Structures," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 1, pages 60-72.
    3. J. Vernon Henderson, Zmarak Shalizi, and Anthony J. Venables, 2001. "Geography and development," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 81-105, January.
    4. Valentin Cojanu, 2012. "Beyond the ‘Nation State’: the Quest for New Territorial Paradigms in an Interconnected World Economy," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 18(3), pages 498-511, March.
    5. Markus Perkmann, 2007. "Construction of New Territorial Scales: A Framework and Case Study of the EUREGIO Cross-border Region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 253-266.
    6. Ulimwengu, John M. & Sanyal, Prabuddha, 2010. "Is Agricultural Production Spillover the Rationale Behind NEPAD CAADP Framework? Spatial Econometric Approach," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 60945, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Arthur Silvers, 2000. "Limited Linkage, Demand Shifts and the Transboundary Transmission of Regional Growth," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 239-251.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Ayuda & Fernando Collantes & Vicente Pinilla, 2010. "From locational fundamentals to increasing returns: the spatial concentration of population in Spain, 1787–2000," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 25-50, March.
    2. Dilip Saikia, 2016. "Location Pattern of Unorganised Manufacturing Industries in India: A District-level View," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 10(2), pages 225-263, May.
    3. Chloé Duvivier Duvivier & Mary-Françoise Renard & Shi Li, 2012. "Are workers close to cities paid higher non-agricultural wages in rural China?," CERDI Working papers halshs-00673698, HAL.
    4. Szalavetz, Andrea, 2002. "Az informatikai szektor és a felzárkózó gazdaságok [The informatics sector and the advancing economies]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 794-804.
    5. Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso & Laura Márquez-Ramos, 2005. "Does Technology Foster Trade? Empirical Evidence for Developed and Developing Countries," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 33(1), pages 55-69, March.
    6. Larue, Solène & Latruffe, Laure, 2009. "Agglomeration externalities and technical efficiency in French pig production," Working Papers 210403, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    7. Burgoa, Rodrigo, 2011. "Consecuencias económicas del enclaustramiento marítimo sobre las exportaciones bolivianas [Landlockedness Economic Impact upon Bolivian Exports]," MPRA Paper 59904, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Fricke, Carola, 2014. "Grenzüberschreitende Governance in der Raumplanung: Organisations- und Kooperationsformen in Basel und Lille," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 62-78, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    9. Maria Tsiapa, 2014. "Industrial Concentration Patterns of the European Union," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 5-33.
    10. Luca S. D’Acci & David Banister & Roger W. White, 2024. "Liveable urban forms: planning, self-organisation, and a third way (Isobenefit urbanism)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Peter Wostner, 2003. "Regional Disparities in Transition Economies: the case of Slovenia," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2003(1).
    12. Chakra P. Acharya & Roberto Leon-Gonzalez, 2016. "International Remittances, Rural-Urban Migration, and the Quest for Quality Education: The Case of Nepal," GRIPS Discussion Papers 15-25, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
    13. Uwe Deichmann & Marianne Fay & Jun Koo & Somik V. Lall, 2004. "Economic structure, productivity, and infrastructure quality in Southern Mexico," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 38(3), pages 361-385, September.
    14. Beugelsdijk, S. & Cornet, M., 2001. "How far do They Reach? The Localization of Industrial and Academic Knowledge Spillovers in the Netherlands," Other publications TiSEM 303b1186-e227-43ce-a118-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. C. Duvivier & S. Li & M.-F. Renard, 2013. "Are workers close to cities paid higher nonagricultural wages in rural China?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(30), pages 4308-4322, October.
    16. Paul Friesen & Stephen Kosempel, 2010. "A Calibrated Trade Model of Agglomeration," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 714-729, September.
    17. ., 2012. "Socio-economic impact of regional transport infrastructure in the Greater Mekong Subregion," Chapters, in: Biswa Nath Bhattacharyay & Masahiro Kawai & Rajat M. Nag (ed.), Infrastructure for Asian Connectivity, chapter 4, pages 95-138, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Steven Poelhekke & Frederick Van der Ploeg, 2008. "Growth, Foreign Direct Investment and Urban Concentrations: Unbundling Spatial Lags," CESifo Working Paper Series 2474, CESifo.
    19. Anthony J. Venables, 2005. "Spatial disparities in developing countries: cities, regions, and international trade," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 3-21, January.
    20. Cerina, Fabio & Mureddu, Francesco, 2014. "Is agglomeration really good for growth? Global efficiency, interregional equity and uneven growth," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 9-22.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2015:v:2:p:92-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.