IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ipf/psejou/v46y2022i3p355-383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of combining budgetary innovations at the local level: experience from Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Martina Balazova

    (Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Arts, Bratislava, Slovakia)

  • Daniel Klimovsky

    (Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Arts, Bratislava, Slovakia; University of Pardubice, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Science and Research Centre, Pardubice, Czech Republic)

  • Maria Murray Svidronova

    (Matej Bel University in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia)

Abstract

Slovakia belongs to a highly decentralised group of European countries, especially in terms of autonomy of local governments. The structure of local governments is extremely fragmented and therefore the individual capacities of many of them can be quite limited. Programme performance-based budgeting was introduced as a compulsory budgetary innovation for all larger local governments several years ago. Moreover, dozens of them have already experienced participatory budgeting. The aim of this article is to analyse the links between programme performance-based budgeting and participatory budgeting as local budgetary innovations and to identify the key political factors influencing the spread and durability of participatory budgeting in Slovakia. The findings show that in most municipalities there is a link between PB and PPBB, which is rather positive and could help to sustain PB in the municipality. The second part of the research reveals two political determinants influencing the success of participatory budgeting in Slovakia.

Suggested Citation

  • Martina Balazova & Daniel Klimovsky & Maria Murray Svidronova, 2022. "Determinants of combining budgetary innovations at the local level: experience from Slovakia," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 46(3), pages 355-383.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipf:psejou:v:46:y:2022:i:3:p:355-383
    DOI: 10.3326/pse.46.3.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pse-journal.hr/upload/files/pse/2022/3/balazova.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3326/pse.46.3.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gianpaolo Baiocchi, 2001. "Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory," Politics & Society, , vol. 29(1), pages 43-72, March.
    2. Gianpaolo Baiocchi & Ernesto Ganuza, 2014. "Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered," Politics & Society, , vol. 42(1), pages 29-50, March.
    3. Rebecca Abers, 1998. "From Clientelism to Cooperation: Local Government, Participatory Policy, and Civic Organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil," Politics & Society, , vol. 26(4), pages 511-537, December.
    4. Džinić Jasmina & Svidroňová Mária Murray & Markowska-Bzducha Ewa, 2016. "Participatory Budgeting: A Comparative Study of Croatia, Poland and Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 31-56, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    2. Katarzyna Kołat & Marek Furmankiewicz & Magdalena Kalisiak-Mędelska, 2022. "What Are the Needs of City Dwellers in Terms of the Development of Public Spaces? A Case Study of Participatory Budgeting in Częstochowa, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Schaeffer, Michael & Yilmaz, Serdar, 2008. "Strengthening local government budgeting and accountability," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4767, The World Bank.
    4. Lavalle, Adrian Gurza & Acharya, Arnab & Houtzager, Peter P., 2005. "Beyond comparative anecdotalism: lessons on civil society and participation from Sao Paulo, Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 951-964, June.
    5. Jaramillo, Miguel & Wright, Glenn Daniel, 2015. "Participatory Democracy and Effective Policy: Is There a Link? Evidence from Rural Peru," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 280-292.
    6. Ackerman, John, 2004. "Co-Governance for Accountability: Beyond "Exit" and "Voice"," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 447-463, March.
    7. Gonçalves, Sónia, 2014. "The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 94-110.
    8. Ernesto Ganuza & Héloïse Nez & Ernesto Morales, 2014. "The Struggle for a Voice: Tensions between Associations and Citizens in Participatory Budgeting," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2274-2291, November.
    9. Grindle, Merilee, 2010. "Sanctions, Benefits, and Rights: Three Faces of Accountability," Working Paper Series rwp10-026, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    10. Novy, Andreas & Leubolt, Bernhard, 2004. "Das Partizipative Budget in Porto Alegre. Die Dialektik von staatlichen und nicht-staatlichen Formen sozialer Innovation," SRE-Discussion Papers 2004/03, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    11. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    12. Capaccioli, Andrea & Poderi, Giacomo & Bettega, Mela & D'Andrea, Vincenzo, 2017. "Exploring participatory energy budgeting as a policy instrument to foster energy justice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 621-630.
    13. repec:prg:jnlcfu:v:2022:y:2022:i:2:id:576 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. repec:foi:wpaper:2010_14 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Terence Wood, 2018. "The clientelism trap in Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea, and its impact on aid policy," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 481-494, September.
    16. Eric Sabourin, 2022. "Public Policies for Sustainable Territorial Development in Brazil: Between Clientelism and Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Salvatore Russo, 2013. "Governance challenges by participatory budget in the Italian municipalities," Working Papers 23, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    18. Harriet Bulkeley & Andrés Luque-Ayala & Colin McFarlane & Gordon MacLeod, 2018. "Enhancing urban autonomy: Towards a new political project for cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(4), pages 702-719, March.
    19. Julien Vrydagh, 2022. "Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 65-88, March.
    20. Vreeland, James & Spada, Paolo, 2010. "Participatory Decision Making: A Field Experiment on Manipulating the Votes," MPRA Paper 24048, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Berliner, Daniel, 2023. "Information Processing in Participatory Governance," SocArXiv snerh, Center for Open Science.
    22. Marek Furmankiewicz & Adrian Campbell, 2019. "From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    programme performance-based budgeting; participatory budgeting; transparency; accountability; local government; Slovakia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • H76 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Other Expenditure Categories
    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipf:psejou:v:46:y:2022:i:3:p:355-383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martina Fabris (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ijfffhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.