IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i5p240-d1384116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Defense of a Peripheral Epistemology: Exploring “Decolonial Cognitive Triggers” for Epistemic Disobedience in Urban Peripheries

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Lannes Fernandes

    (School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
    UNIPeriferias, Rio de Janeiro 21044-262, Brazil)

  • Heloisa Melino

    (Independent Consultant in Human Rights Law, Gender, Race and Decolonial Studies, Rio de Janeiro 22040-002, Brazil)

  • Jailson De Souza e Silva

    (UNIPeriferias, Rio de Janeiro 21044-262, Brazil)

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to decolonial thinking and epistemological disobedience through what we call “decolonial cognitive triggers”. It is based on the struggles of urban peripheral communities in Brazil and explores eight triggers in the making of a Peripheral Epistemology. The unique points of our reflection are the sociocultural practices emerging from urban peripheral communities in Brazil and their responses to structural racism. As a part of this, we will explore the concepts of potência and convivência as core components of the decolonial debate, as well as their role in enabling epistemic disobedience in urban peripheries. We conclude by suggesting shifts in policy-making directed towards urban peripheries through the recognition and incorporation of such concepts and triggers.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Lannes Fernandes & Heloisa Melino & Jailson De Souza e Silva, 2024. "In Defense of a Peripheral Epistemology: Exploring “Decolonial Cognitive Triggers” for Epistemic Disobedience in Urban Peripheries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:240-:d:1384116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/5/240/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/5/240/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Robinson & Ananya Roy, 2016. "Debate on Global Urbanisms and the Nature of Urban Theory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 181-186, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Castañeda, Paola, 2021. "Cycling case closed? A situated response to Samuel Nello-Deakin's “Environmental determinants of cycling: Not seeing the forest for the trees?”," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Ramesh, Niranjana, 2022. "An experiment with the minor geographies of major cities: infrastructural relations among the fragments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114952, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Robert A Beauregard, 0. "Do individual cities matter? Negotiating the particular," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(3), pages 593-603.
    4. Partha Mukhopadhyay & Marie‐Hélène Zérah & Eric Denis, 2020. "Subaltern Urbanization: Indian Insights for Urban Theory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 582-598, July.
    5. Kevin Ward & Timothy Bunnell, 2021. "Reflections on five years of the Summer Institute in Urban Studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(4), pages 863-878, March.
    6. Fulong Wu, 2018. "Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1383-1399, May.
    7. Das, Ashok & Susantono, Bambang (ed.), 2022. "Informal Services in Asian Cities: Lessons for Urban Planning and Management from the COVID-19 Pandemic," ADBI Books, Asian Development Bank Institute, number 30, Décembre.
    8. Prasad Khanolkar, 2020. "Book review: Plays of Urban Flux Elisa T. Bertuzzo, Archipelagos: From Urbanisation to Translocalisation," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 14(1), pages 136-139, April.
    9. Chaitawat Boonjubun, 2019. "Also the Urban Poor Live in Gated Communities: A Bangkok Case Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Gunvor Jónsson & Maria Lindmäe & Joanna Menet & Emil Van Eck, 2023. "‘ALL EYES ON ME’: The (In)Formal Barriers to Market Trade in Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 221-236, March.
    11. Bharathi, Naveen & Malghan, Deepak & Mishra, Sumit & Rahman, Andaleeb, 2021. "Fractal urbanism: City size and residential segregation in India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    12. Christof Parnreiter, 2022. "The Janus-faced genius of cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1315-1333, May.
    13. Mary Lawhon & Yaffa Truelove, 2020. "Disambiguating the southern urban critique: Propositions, pathways and possibilities for a more global urban studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 3-20, January.
    14. Huan Zhang & Adam Grydehøj, 2021. "Locating the interstitial island: Integration of Zhoushan Archipelago into the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 2157-2173, August.
    15. Frances Brill & Veronica Conte, 2020. "Understanding project mobility: The movement of King’s Cross to Brussels and Johannesburg," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(1), pages 79-96, February.
    16. Allen J. Scott, 2019. "City-regions reconsidered," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 554-580, May.
    17. Morgan Mouton & Gavin Shatkin, 2020. "Strategizing the for-profit city: The state, developers, and urban production in Mega Manila," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 403-422, March.
    18. Tooran Alizadeh & Deepti Prasad, 2024. "The right to the smart city in the Global South: A research agenda," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(3), pages 426-444, February.
    19. Lily Kong & Junxi Qian, 2019. "Knowledge circulation in urban geography/urban studies, 1990–2010: Testing the discourse of Anglo-American hegemony through publication and citation patterns," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(1), pages 44-80, January.
    20. Allan Cochrane, 2020. "Riffing Off Kevin Cox: Thinking through Comparison," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 537-539, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:5:p:240-:d:1384116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.