IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i10p211-d1245708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Strategic Planning: The Crucial Role of Enhancing Relationships between Management Levels

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Mandel Gandrita

    (Department of Strategy, Universidade Europeia, 1500-210 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

Having a fruitful relationship with all levels of management can increase the likelihood of better opportunities within and outside the organization. In some environments, it is known that participation in strategic planning creates better overall conditions for all partners, better conditions for retention, and above all, loyalty to talent. The very acceptance of contributions to this desideratum entails knowledge sharing and knowledge management. Our study examines how the relationship between management levels can disrupt strategic planning, particularly in contexts of resistance to change, situations that can affect talent retention and loyalty. Gathering the essential data to enhance the recommendations and contributions, the organization’s overall robustness takes shape through a combination of participant and nonparticipant observation, alongside interviews and questionnaires administered within the company. Initially, a qualitative approach was employed, involving interviews with a cohort of n = 14 top management executives. Subsequently, a qualitative method was employed, involving questionnaires distributed to a group of n = 204 individuals encompassing middle and lower management levels. Our conclusions, therefore, reflect the continuation of a research study. This paper contributes to the literature of work pursued by exploring how social actors and different stakeholders can make a difference in participating in strategic planning and how they can overcome, in counterpoint, the limitations of possibly not being able to participate in such strategic planning. Our contribution will also result in a critical understanding of the need for talent retention and loyalty, highlighting how retention efforts, especially the small nudges that are absolutely significant in terms of employee participation and even emotional pay purposes, are differentiators and can overcome, very concretely, resistance to change.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Mandel Gandrita, 2023. "Improving Strategic Planning: The Crucial Role of Enhancing Relationships between Management Levels," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:211-:d:1245708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/10/211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/10/211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bert George, 2017. "Does strategic planning ‘work’ in public organizations? Insights from Flemish municipalities," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 527-530, November.
    2. Jing Li & Richard Pike & Roszaini Haniffa, 2008. "Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 137-159.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia Crifo & Elena Escrig-Olmedo & Nicolas Mottis, 2019. "Corporate Governance as a Key Driver of Corporate Sustainability in France: The Role of Board Members and Investor Relations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1127-1146, November.
    2. Khurram Ashfaq & Rui Zhang & Abdul Munaim & Naveed Razzaq, 2016. "An Investigation into the Determinants of Risk Disclosure in Banks: Evidence from Financial Sector of Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(3), pages 1049-1058.
    3. Simone Pizzi & Fabio Caputo & Andrea Venturelli, 2020. "Does it pay to be an honest entrepreneur? Addressing the relationship between sustainable development and bankruptcy risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1478-1486, May.
    4. Chidiebele Innocent Onyali & Chinedu Uchenna Okerekeoti, 2018. "Board Heterogeneity and Corporate Performance of Firms in Nigeria," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 103-117, July.
    5. María Consuelo Pucheta‐Martínez & Isabel Gallego‐Álvarez, 2018. "Environmental reporting policy and corporate structures: An international analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 788-798, September.
    6. Elena Platonova & Mehmet Asutay & Rob Dixon & Sabri Mohammad, 2018. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Financial Performance: Evidence from the GCC Islamic Banking Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 451-471, August.
    7. Hidaya Lawati & Khaled Hussainey & Roza Sagitova, 2021. "Disclosure quality vis-à-vis disclosure quantity: Does audit committee matter in Omani financial institutions?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 557-594, August.
    8. Nicolò, Giuseppe & Raimo, Nicola & Polcini, Paolo Tartaglia & Vitolla, Filippo, 2021. "Unveiling the link between performance and Intellectual Capital disclosure in the context of Italian Public universities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    9. Braune, Eric & Sahut, Jean-Michel & Teulon, Fréderic, 2020. "Intangible capital, governance and financial performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Nicoleta Maria Ienciu, 2012. "Theoretical Fundamentals of Human Factor," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 15(45), pages 247-264, September.
    11. Vandana Mehrotra & Amarjeet Kaur Malhotra & Rashmi Pant, 2018. "Intellectual Capital Disclosure by the Indian Corporate Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(2), pages 376-392, April.
    12. Ge Wang & Huijin Zhang & Saixing Zeng & Xiaohua Meng & Han Lin, 2023. "Reporting on sustainable development: Configurational effects of top management team and corporate characteristics on environmental information disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 28-52, January.
    13. Ruth Hidalgo & Emma García-Meca & Isabel Martínez, 2011. "Corporate Governance and Intellectual Capital Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 483-495, May.
    14. Ali Altug Bicer & Imad Mohamed Feneir, 2019. "The Impact of Audit Committee Characteristics on Environmental and Social Disclosures:Evidence from Turkey," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 8(3), pages 111-121, May.
    15. Mar Arenas-Parra & Susana Álvarez-Otero, 2020. "CSR Disclosure: The IPO Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Duho, King Carl Tornam & Onumah, Joseph Mensah, 2018. "The Determinants of Intellectual Capital Performance of Banks in Ghana: an Empirical Approach," OSF Preprints d8cwz, Center for Open Science.
    17. Lúcia Lima Rodrigues & Francisca Tejedo-Romero & Russell Craig, 2017. "Corporate governance and intellectual capital reporting in a period of financial crisis: Evidence from Portugal," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, February.
    18. Chiara Mio & Marco Fasan & Carlo Marcon & Silvia Panfilo, 2020. "The predictive ability of legitimacy and agency theory after the implementation of the EU directive on non‐financial information," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2465-2476, November.
    19. Jaeschke, Reemda & Lopatta, Kerstin & Yi, Cheong, 2018. "Managers’ use of language in corrupt firms’ financial disclosures: Evidence from FCPA violators," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 170-192.
    20. Corinne Ollier Bessieux & Emmanuelle Negre & Marie-Anne Verdier, 2022. "Moving from Accounting for People to Accounting with People: A Critical Analysis of the Literature and Avenues for Research," Post-Print hal-03889478, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:211-:d:1245708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.