IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v178y2023ics0965856423002999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of a price incentive policy on urban rail transit passengers: A case study in Nanjing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Qing
  • Zhao, Wenjing
  • Ma, Shoufeng
  • Schonfeld, Paul M.
  • Zheng, Yue
  • Xue, Dabin

Abstract

To alleviate travel congestion at peak periods or on congested routes, some measures for urban rail transit (URT) systems including fare incentive schemes and subsidy policies have been widely adopted. Existing measures can alleviate demand during peak periods or on congested routes to a certain extent, but they do not consider the passengers’ satisfaction with their travel experience. Consequently, this study aims to investigate passengers’ acceptance of a fare incentive policy offering a discounted fare during off-peak periods or on uncongested routes before it is implemented in Nanjing, China. To understand passengers’ acceptance of the policy, this study explores the effects of the policy on passengers’ route choices. Furthermore, the differences among passengers with respect to different travel purposes and travel times in route choices have been analyzed. A revealed preference (RP) survey and a stated preference (SP) survey consisting of 463 samples from URT passengers in Nanjing, China, were conducted and analyzed using a random-parameter multinomial logit (RPMNL) model. Results show that socio-economic variables, travel characteristics, travel cost, departure time, and travel distance significantly affect passengers’ route choices. Furthermore, the route choices of passengers with different travelling times and purposes vary. Commuters are most sensitive to travel cost during off-peak periods, followed by non-commuters who travel during peak periods. Departure time and travel distance most significantly affect the route choices of non-commuters during peak periods and off-peak periods, respectively. The findings of this study could assist transit agencies in designing attractive fare incentive policies for public transit passengers and offer valuable insights into effective demand management strategies. Moreover, the lessons derived from this study may guide the implementation of fare incentive policies in Nanjing, China, and elsewhere.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Qing & Zhao, Wenjing & Ma, Shoufeng & Schonfeld, Paul M. & Zheng, Yue & Xue, Dabin, 2023. "Effects of a price incentive policy on urban rail transit passengers: A case study in Nanjing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:178:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423002999
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856423002999
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103879?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andersson, David & Nässén, Jonas, 2016. "The Gothenburg congestion charge scheme: A pre–post analysis of commuting behavior and travel satisfaction," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 82-89.
    2. Coulombel, Nicolas & Munch, Emmanuel & Pivano, Cyril, 2023. "Travel demand management: The solution to public transit congestion? An ex-ante evaluation of staggered work hours schemes for the Paris region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 48-66.
    3. Nan Yang & Yong Long Lim, 2018. "Temporary Incentives Change Daily Routines: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Singapore’s Subways," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3365-3379, July.
    4. Azari, Kian Ahmadi & Arintono, Sulistyo & Hamid, Hussain & Davoodi, Seyed Rasoul, 2013. "Evaluation of demand for different trip purposes under various congestion pricing scenarios," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 43-51.
    5. Prasanta K. Sahu & Gajanand Sharma & Anirban Guharoy, 2018. "Commuter travel cost estimation at different levels of crowding in a suburban rail system: a case study of Mumbai," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 379-398, December.
    6. Rouwendal, Jan & Verhoef, Erik T. & Knockaert, Jasper, 2012. "Give or take? Rewards versus charges for a congested bottleneck," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 166-176.
    7. Ben Clark & Kiron Chatterjee & Adam Martin & Adrian Davis, 2020. "How commuting affects subjective wellbeing," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 2777-2805, December.
    8. Karlström, Anders & Franklin, Joel P., 2009. "Behavioral adjustments and equity effects of congestion pricing: Analysis of morning commutes during the Stockholm Trial," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 283-296, March.
    9. Yang, Hai & Huang, Hai-Jun, 1998. "Principle of marginal-cost pricing: how does it work in a general road network?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 45-54, January.
    10. Yang, Hai & Tang, Yili, 2018. "Managing rail transit peak-hour congestion with a fare-reward scheme," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 122-136.
    11. Coulombel, Nicolas & Monchambert, Guillaume, 2023. "Diseconomies of scale and subsidies in urban public transportation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    12. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387, November.
    13. Haywood, Luke & Koning, Martin, 2015. "The distribution of crowding costs in public transport: New evidence from Paris," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 182-201.
    14. Thommen, Christoph & Hintermann, Beat, 2023. "Price versus Commitment: Managing the demand for off-peak train tickets in a field experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Coulombel, Nicolas, 2018. "Why housing and transport costs should always be considered together: A monocentric analysis of prudential measures in housing access," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 89-105.
    16. Ben-Elia, Eran & Ettema, Dick, 2009. "Carrots versus sticks: Rewarding commuters for avoiding the rush-hour--a study of willingness to participate," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 68-76, March.
    17. Luo, Mingjie & Ma, Zhuanglin & Zhao, Wenjing & Enoch, Marcus & I-Jy Chien, Steven, 2022. "An ex-post evaluation of the public acceptance of a license plate-based restriction policy: A case study of Xi’an, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 259-282.
    18. Guo, Qianwen & Sun, Yanshuo & Schonfeld, Paul & Li, Zhongfei, 2021. "Time-dependent transit fare optimization with elastic and spatially distributed demand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 353-378.
    19. Hörcher, Daniel & Graham, Daniel J., 2018. "Demand imbalances and multi-period public transport supply," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 106-126.
    20. Mikkel Thorhauge & Akshay Vij & Elisabetta Cherchi, 2021. "Heterogeneity in departure time preferences, flexibility and schedule constraints," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1865-1893, August.
    21. Saleh, Wafaa & Farrell, Séona, 2005. "Implications of congestion charging for departure time choice: Work and non-work schedule flexibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(7-9), pages 773-791.
    22. Mauricio Sillano & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2005. "Willingness-to-Pay Estimation with Mixed Logit Models: Some New Evidence," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(3), pages 525-550, March.
    23. Ding, Hongliang & Sze, N.N. & Li, Haojie & Guo, Yanyong, 2021. "Affected area and residual period of London Congestion Charging scheme on road safety," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 120-128.
    24. Anupriya, & Graham, Daniel J. & Hörcher, Daniel & Anderson, Richard J. & Bansal, Prateek, 2020. "Quantifying the ex-post causal impact of differential pricing on commuter trip scheduling in Hong Kong," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 16-34.
    25. Börjesson, Maria & Kristoffersson, Ida, 2015. "The Gothenburg congestion charge. Effects, design and politics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 134-146.
    26. Börjesson, Maria & Rubensson, Isak, 2019. "Satisfaction with crowding and other attributes in public transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 213-222.
    27. Zhao, Wenjing & Ma, Zhuanglin & Yang, Kui & Huang, Helai & Monsuur, Fredrik & Lee, Jaeyoung, 2020. "Impacts of variable message signs on en-route route choice behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 335-349.
    28. Geng, Kexin & Wang, Yacan & Cherchi, Elisabetta & Guarda, Pablo, 2023. "Commuter departure time choice behavior under congestion charge: Analysis based on cumulative prospect theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    29. Thorhauge, Mikkel & Kassahun, Habtamu Tilahun & Cherchi, Elisabetta & Haustein, Sonja, 2020. "Mobility needs, activity patterns and activity flexibility: How subjective and objective constraints influence mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 255-272.
    30. Majumdar, Bandhan Bandhu & Jayakumar, Malavika & Sahu, Prasanta K. & Potoglou, Dimitris, 2021. "Identification of key determinants of travel satisfaction for developing policy instrument to improve quality of life: An analysis of commuting in Delhi," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 281-292.
    31. Link, Heike, 2015. "Is car drivers’ response to congestion charging schemes based on the correct perception of price signals?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 96-109.
    32. Li, Haiying & Li, Xian & Xu, Xinyue & Liu, Jun & Ran, Bin, 2018. "Modeling departure time choice of metro passengers with a smart corrected mixed logit model - A case study in Beijing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 106-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    2. Lin, Joanne Yuh-Jye & Jenelius, Erik & Cebecauer, Matej & Rubensson, Isak & Chen, Cynthia, 2023. "The equity of public transport crowding exposure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Tian, Ye & Chiu, Yi-Chang & Sun, Jian, 2019. "Understanding behavioral effects of tradable mobility credit scheme: An experimental economics approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Tang, Yili & Jiang, Yu & Yang, Hai & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2020. "Modeling and optimizing a fare incentive strategy to manage queuing and crowding in mass transit systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 247-267.
    5. Lingjuan Chen & Yijing Zhao & Zupeng Liu & Xinran Yang, 2022. "Construction of Commuters’ Multi-Mode Choice Model Based on Public Transport Operation Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Wang, Yu & Wang, Yacan & Ettema, Dick & Mao, Zidan & Charlton, Samuel G. & Zhou, Huiyu, 2020. "Commuter value perceptions in peak avoidance behavior: An empirical study in the Beijing subway system," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 70-84.
    7. Bouscasse, Hélène & de Lapparent, Matthieu, 2019. "Perceived comfort and values of travel time savings in the Rhône-Alpes Region," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 370-387.
    8. Andrea Baranzini & Stefano Carattini & Linda Tesauro, 2021. "Designing Effective and Acceptable Road Pricing Schemes: Evidence from the Geneva Congestion Charge," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(3), pages 417-482, July.
    9. Scaccia, Luisa & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2023. "Prediction and confidence intervals of willingness-to-pay for mixed logit models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 54-78.
    10. Eliasson, Jonas, 2016. "Is congestion pricing fair? Consumer and citizen perspectives on equity effects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-15.
    11. Wang, Bin & Zacharias, John, 2020. "Noise, odor and passenger density in perceived crowding in public transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 215-223.
    12. Batarce, Marco & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2016. "Valuing crowding in public transport: Implications for cost-benefit analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 358-378.
    13. Bounie, Nathan & Adoue, François & Koning, Martin & L'Hostis, Alain, 2019. "What value do travelers put on connectivity to mobile phone and Internet networks in public transport? Empirical evidence from the Paris region," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 158-177.
    14. Rezaei, Nazanin & Todd-Blick, Annika & Fujita, K. Sydny & Popovich, Natalie & Needell, Zachary & Poliziani, Cristian & Caicedo, Juan David & Guirado, Carlos & Spurlock, C. Anna, 2024. "At the nexus of equity and transportation modeling: Assessing accessibility through the Individual Experienced Utility-Based Synthesis (INEXUS) metric," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Majumdar, Bandhan Bandhu & Jayakumar, Malavika & Sahu, Prasanta K. & Potoglou, Dimitris, 2021. "Identification of key determinants of travel satisfaction for developing policy instrument to improve quality of life: An analysis of commuting in Delhi," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 281-292.
    16. Anastassiadis, Friederike & Liebe, Ulf & Musshoff, Oliver, 2012. "Finanzielle Flexibilität In Landwirtschaftlichen Investitionsentscheidungen: Ein Discrete Choice Experiment," 52nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 26-28, 2012 137142, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    17. Daina, Nicolò & Sivakumar, Aruna & Polak, John W., 2017. "Modelling electric vehicles use: a survey on the methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 447-460.
    18. Schmid, Basil & Becker, Felix & Axhausen, Kay W. & Widmer, Paul & Stein, Petra, 2023. "A simultaneous model of residential location, mobility tool ownership and mode choice using latent variables," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    19. Beck, Matthew J. & Hensher, David A., 2022. "Working from home in Australia in 2020: Positives, negatives and the potential for future benefits to transport and society," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 271-284.
    20. Gao, Kun & Sun, Lijun & Yang, Ying & Meng, Fanyu & Qu, Xiaobo, 2021. "Cumulative prospect theory coupled with multi-attribute decision making for modeling travel behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-21.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:178:y:2023:i:c:s0965856423002999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.