IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v92y2024icp50-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring spatial impacts and tracking cross-border risk

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Bo
  • Xiao, Yang

Abstract

Using a dynamic spatial model, this paper studies the cross-countries risk contagion of stock markets during the pandemic outbreak and Ukraine-Russia conflict. We adopt five channels for modeling spatial interdependency between markets and measure short- and long-term impacts. The estimated results show that a change of COVID-19 or the conflict in one market has a negative impact on other markets. In addition, we construct a risk network based on these indirect effects, which visualizes risk transmissions between markets from five channels. We document that geographic proximity and diversification affect risk transmissions between markets via its impact on distinctive interdependencies. The pandemic and the conflict have serious repercussions for the stock markets located in the regions correlated more with the zones suffering from the two events, respectively. As a robust test, we explore heterogeneous effects in regions and periods. The impact of COVID-19 is negative in all regions, but the war is significant in the regions with Europe. The impact of COVID-19 on stock markets is significant during 2020–2021, and the impact of the conflict on stock markets is significant during 2022. Our study complements the risk contagion studies on cross-border stock markets from a spatiotemporal perspective and provides implications for policy-makers and investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Bo & Xiao, Yang, 2024. "Measuring spatial impacts and tracking cross-border risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 50-84.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:92:y:2024:i:c:p:50-84
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.01.069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024000698
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.01.069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:92:y:2024:i:c:p:50-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.