IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v185y2024ics0301421523005062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electrolysis as a flexibility resource on energy islands: The case of the North Sea

Author

Listed:
  • Lüth, Alexandra
  • Werner, Yannick
  • Egging-Bratseth, Ruud
  • Kazempour, Jalal

Abstract

Energy islands are meant to facilitate offshore sector integration by combining offshore wind energy with power-to-x technologies and storage. In this study, we investigate the operation of electrolysers on energy islands, assess their potential contribution to flexibility provision, and analyse different market integration strategies of the islands. For this purpose, a two-stage stochastic optimisation model is developed to determine the cost-efficient dispatch for an integrated day-ahead and balancing electricity market. For the market integration of the energy island, we align our approach to the current debate and compare the case of a single offshore bidding zone to a case where the energy island is integrated into a home market zone. We find that electrolysers on energy islands will run at low capacity factors and provide flexibility in 29–36% of their run time. In addition, offshore electrolysers produce more hydrogen when they are allocated to an offshore bidding zone, and thus earn higher profits. We conclude that combining offshore wind with electrolysers on an energy island relies on additional economic incentives if their main role is envisioned to be the delivery of balancing flexibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Lüth, Alexandra & Werner, Yannick & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Kazempour, Jalal, 2024. "Electrolysis as a flexibility resource on energy islands: The case of the North Sea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523005062
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421523005062
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113921?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:aen:journl:eeep4_1_meeus is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Juan Gea-Bermúdez & Lena Kitzing & Matti Koivisto & Kaushik Das & Juan Pablo Murcia León & Poul Sørensen, 2022. "The Value of Sector Coupling for the Development of Offshore Power Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Kaldellis, J.K. & Apostolou, D. & Kapsali, M. & Kondili, E., 2016. "Environmental and social footprint of offshore wind energy. Comparison with onshore counterpart," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 543-556.
    4. Sunila, Kanerva & Bergaentzlé, Claire & Martin, Bénédicte & Ekroos, Ari, 2019. "A supra-national TSO to enhance offshore wind power development in the Baltic Sea? A legal and regulatory analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 775-782.
    5. Li, Xinyu & Mulder, Machiel, 2021. "Value of power-to-gas as a flexibility option in integrated electricity and hydrogen markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    6. Flamm, Benjamin & Peter, Christian & Büchi, Felix N. & Lygeros, John, 2021. "Electrolyzer modeling and real-time control for optimized production of hydrogen gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    7. Houghton, T. & Bell, K.R.W. & Doquet, M., 2016. "Offshore transmission for wind: Comparing the economic benefits of different offshore network configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 268-279.
    8. Gunther Glenk & Stefan Reichelstein, 2019. "Publisher Correction: Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(4), pages 347-347, April.
    9. Zheng, Yi & You, Shi & Bindner, Henrik W. & Münster, Marie, 2022. "Optimal day-ahead dispatch of an alkaline electrolyser system concerning thermal–electric properties and state-transitional dynamics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    10. Xiong, Bobby & Predel, Johannes & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud, 2021. "Spatial flexibility in redispatch: Supporting low carbon energy systems with Power-to-Gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    11. Schlachtberger, D.P. & Brown, T. & Schramm, S. & Greiner, M., 2017. "The benefits of cooperation in a highly renewable European electricity network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 469-481.
    12. Durakovic, Goran & del Granado, Pedro Crespo & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2023. "Powering Europe with North Sea offshore wind: The impact of hydrogen investments on grid infrastructure and power prices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    13. Gunther Glenk & Stefan Reichelstein, 2019. "Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 216-222, March.
    14. Lüth, Alexandra & Seifert, Paul E. & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Weibezahn, Jens, 2023. "How to connect energy islands: Trade-offs between hydrogen and electricity infrastructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    15. Egerer, Jonas & Kunz, Friedrich & Hirschhausen, Christian von, 2013. "Development scenarios for the North and Baltic Seas Grid – A welfare economic analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 123-134.
    16. Leonardo Meeus, 2015. "Offshore grids for renewables: do we need a particular regulatory framework?," Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    17. Tosatto, Andrea & Beseler, Xavier Martínez & Østergaard, Jacob & Pinson, Pierre & Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros, 2022. "North Sea Energy Islands: Impact on national markets and grids," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. Grueger, Fabian & Möhrke, Fabian & Robinius, Martin & Stolten, Detlef, 2017. "Early power to gas applications: Reducing wind farm forecast errors and providing secondary control reserve," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 551-562.
    19. Zhu, Wei Jun & Shen, Wen Zhong & Barlas, Emre & Bertagnolio, Franck & Sørensen, Jens Nørkær, 2018. "Wind turbine noise generation and propagation modeling at DTU Wind Energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 133-150.
    20. Pfenninger, Stefan & Staffell, Iain, 2016. "Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1251-1265.
    21. Zhang, Hongyu & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Svendsen, Harald G. & Bakker, Steffen J. & Grossmann, Ignacio E., 2022. "Modelling and analysis of offshore energy hubs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    22. Juan M. Morales & Antonio J. Conejo & Henrik Madsen & Pierre Pinson & Marco Zugno, 2014. "Integrating Renewables in Electricity Markets," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-9411-9, December.
    23. Martin Kristiansen & Magnus Korpås & Hossein Farahmand, 2018. "Towards a fully integrated North Sea offshore grid: An engineering‐economic assessment of a power link island," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(4), July.
    24. Staffell, Iain & Pfenninger, Stefan, 2016. "Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1224-1239.
    25. Gea-Bermúdez, Juan & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Koivisto, Matti & Kitzing, Lena & Ramos, Andrés, 2023. "Going offshore or not: Where to generate hydrogen in future integrated energy systems?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    26. Ibrahim, Omar S. & Singlitico, Alessandro & Proskovics, Roberts & McDonagh, Shane & Desmond, Cian & Murphy, Jerry D., 2022. "Dedicated large-scale floating offshore wind to hydrogen: Assessing design variables in proposed typologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lüth, Alexandra & Werner, Yannick & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Kazempour, Jalal, 2022. "Electrolysis as a Flexibility Resource on Energy Islands: The Case of the North Sea," Working Papers 13-2022, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    2. Lüth, Alexandra & Seifert, Paul E. & Egging-Bratseth, Ruud & Weibezahn, Jens, 2023. "How to connect energy islands: Trade-offs between hydrogen and electricity infrastructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    3. Wiegner, J.F. & Andreasson, L.M. & Kusters, J.E.H. & Nienhuis, R.M., 2024. "Interdisciplinary perspectives on offshore energy system integration in the North Sea: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    4. Bødal, Espen Flo & Holm, Sigmund Eggen & Subramanian, Avinash & Durakovic, Goran & Pinel, Dimitri & Hellemo, Lars & Ortiz, Miguel Muñoz & Knudsen, Brage Rugstad & Straus, Julian, 2024. "Hydrogen for harvesting the potential of offshore wind: A North Sea case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    5. Ringkjøb, Hans-Kristian & Haugan, Peter M. & Nybø, Astrid, 2020. "Transitioning remote Arctic settlements to renewable energy systems – A modelling study of Longyearbyen, Svalbard," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Kirchem, Dana & Schill, Wolf-Peter, 2023. "Power sector effects of green hydrogen production in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Brändle, Gregor & Schönfisch, Max & Schulte, Simon, 2021. "Estimating long-term global supply costs for low-carbon hydrogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    8. Petkov, Ivalin & Gabrielli, Paolo, 2020. "Power-to-hydrogen as seasonal energy storage: an uncertainty analysis for optimal design of low-carbon multi-energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    9. Moradpoor, Iraj & Syri, Sanna & Santasalo-Aarnio, Annukka, 2023. "Green hydrogen production for oil refining – Finnish case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Kountouris, Ioannis & Langer, Lissy & Bramstoft, Rasmus & Münster, Marie & Keles, Dogan, 2023. "Power-to-X in energy hubs: A Danish case study of renewable fuel production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Liu, Hailiang & Andresen, Gorm Bruun & Greiner, Martin, 2018. "Cost-optimal design of a simplified highly renewable Chinese electricity network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 534-546.
    12. Vassilis M. Charitopoulos & Mathilde Fajardy & Chi Kong Chyong & David M. Reiner, 2022. "The case of 100% electrification of domestic heat in Great Britain," Working Papers EPRG2206, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    13. Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2022. "The importance of renewable gas in achieving carbon-neutrality: Insights from an energy system optimization model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    14. Abadie, Luis Mª & Chamorro, José M., 2023. "Investment in wind-based hydrogen production under economic and physical uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 337(C).
    15. Liu, Hailiang & Brown, Tom & Andresen, Gorm Bruun & Schlachtberger, David P. & Greiner, Martin, 2019. "The role of hydro power, storage and transmission in the decarbonization of the Chinese power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1308-1321.
    16. Jerez Monsalves, Juan & Bergaentzlé, Claire & Keles, Dogan, 2023. "Impacts of flexible-cooling and waste-heat recovery from data centres on energy systems: A Danish case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    17. Fabian Stöckl & Alexander Zerrahn, 2023. "Substituting Clean for Dirty Energy: A Bottom-Up Analysis," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(3), pages 819-863.
    18. Mads Raunbak & Timo Zeyer & Kun Zhu & Martin Greiner, 2017. "Principal Mismatch Patterns Across a Simplified Highly Renewable European Electricity Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, November.
    19. McDonagh, Shane & Ahmed, Shorif & Desmond, Cian & Murphy, Jerry D, 2020. "Hydrogen from offshore wind: Investor perspective on the profitability of a hybrid system including for curtailment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    20. Behrang Shirizadeh, 2020. "Carbon-neutral future with sector-coupling; relative role of different mitigation options in energy sector," Working Papers 2020.19, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:185:y:2024:i:c:s0301421523005062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.