IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v218y2024ics0921800923003592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convenient solutions, inconvenient truths – Why supermarkets will not drive food system transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Helander, Hanna
  • Schnepf, Simone
  • Stetter, Theresa
  • Ferrara, Francesca
  • Leipold, Sina

Abstract

Supermarkets play an important role in industrialized food systems, which is why many in academia, politics, industry, and civil society view them as key players in transforming the food system toward greater sustainability. We analyse narratives and proposed solutions in this context, as well as the role of supermarkets in Germany, home to some of the largest retailers worldwide. We show that many actors in the German food system, including supermarkets themselves, perceive the structural problems of overproduction and dysfunctional markets as major obstacles to achieving food system transformation. Despite this, they tend to propose solutions focused on optimization and efficiency in supermarket logistics and retail management or greater consumer awareness. These solutions show little transformative potential. Regarding the structural problem of dysfunctional markets, supermarkets are perceived to be in a quandary due to the drive for profits, competitive markets, and consumer demand. Thus, supermarkets are not likely to drive a transformation of the food system. However, a broadly shared understanding of the core problems of overproduction and dysfunctional markets presents an opportunity for ‘discourse coalitions’ to push for more systemic solutions. The findings may enhance food system stakeholders' understanding of the need for more holistic approaches to addressing sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Helander, Hanna & Schnepf, Simone & Stetter, Theresa & Ferrara, Francesca & Leipold, Sina, 2024. "Convenient solutions, inconvenient truths – Why supermarkets will not drive food system transformation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:218:y:2024:i:c:s0921800923003592
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800923003592
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patricia Allen, 2010. "Realizing justice in local food systems," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 3(2), pages 295-308.
    2. Julia Behringer & Peter H. Feindt, 2019. "How Shall We Judge Agri-Food Governance? Legitimacy Constructions in Food Democracy and Co-Regulation Discourses," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 119-130.
    3. George Tsalis & Birger Boutrup Jensen & S. Wiley Wakeman & Jessica Aschemann-Witzel, 2021. "Promoting Food for the Trash Bin? A Review of the Literature on Retail Price Promotions and Household-Level Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Bree Devin & Carol Richards, 2018. "Food Waste, Power, and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Australian Food Supply Chain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 199-210, June.
    5. Dorninger, Christian & Abson, David J. & Apetrei, Cristina I. & Derwort, Pim & Ives, Christopher D. & Klaniecki, Kathleen & Lam, David P.M. & Langsenlehner, Maria & Riechers, Maraja & Spittler, Nathal, 2020. "Leverage points for sustainability transformation: a review on interventions in food and energy systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Corinna Hawkes, 2008. "Dietary Implications of Supermarket Development: A Global Perspective," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 26(6), pages 657-692, November.
    7. Sabrina Arcuri, 2019. "Food poverty, food waste and the consensus frame on charitable food redistribution in Italy," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 263-275, June.
    8. Olga Chkanikova & Oksana Mont, 2015. "Corporate Supply Chain Responsibility: Drivers and Barriers for Sustainable Food Retailing," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 65-82, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara A. L. Smaal & Joost Dessein & Barend J. Wind & Elke Rogge, 2021. "Social justice-oriented narratives in European urban food strategies: Bringing forward redistribution, recognition and representation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(3), pages 709-727, September.
    2. Annelie Sieveking, 2019. "Food Policy Councils as Loci for Practising Food Democracy? Insights from the Case of Oldenburg, Germany," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 48-58.
    3. Alexandrine Lapoutte & Clara Lohier-Fanchini & Séverine Saleilles, 2017. "De l’aide à la justice alimentaire : Étude d’un partenariat entre Biocoop et des épiceries sociales et solidaires," Post-Print halshs-01660289, HAL.
    4. Verônica Cortez Ginani & Wilma Maria Coelho Araújo & Renata Puppin Zandonadi & Raquel B. Assunção Botelho, 2020. "Identifier of Regional Food Presence (IRFP): A New Perspective to Evaluate Sustainable Menus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Nina Stępnicka & Grzegorz Zimon & Dariusz Brzozowiec, 2021. "The Complementary Currency Zielony in Poland and Its Importance for the Development of Local Economy Entities during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Vincent Caby & Lise Frehen, 2021. "How to Produce and Measure Throughput Legitimacy? Lessons from a Systematic Literature Review," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 226-236.
    7. Debela, B.L. & Demmler, K.M. & Klasen, S. & Qaim, M., 2018. "Supermarket purchase and child nutritional outcomes in urban Kenya," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277078, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Demmler, Kathrin M. & Ecker, Olivier & Qaim, Matin, 2018. "Supermarket Shopping and Nutritional Outcomes: A Panel Data Analysis for Urban Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 292-303.
    9. Saeid Alaei & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2023. "Unveiling the role of sustainable supply chain drivers toward knowledge-based economy via a novel permutation approach: implications from an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1231-1250, September.
    10. Maria Petrescu & Anjala S. Krishen, 2020. "The importance of high-quality data and analytics during the pandemic," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 43-44, June.
    11. Minten, Bart & Reardon, Thomas & Sutradhar, Rajib, 2010. "Food Prices and Modern Retail: The Case of Delhi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1775-1787, December.
    12. Chakori, Sabrina & Aziz, Ammar Abdul & Smith, Carl & Dargusch, Paul, 2021. "Untangling the underlying drivers of the use of single-use food packaging," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    13. Costa-Font, Montserrat & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar, 2017. "Rate of success of new dairy products in the UK: how important are health and sustainable claims?," 91st Annual Conference, April 24-26, 2017, Royal Dublin Society, Dublin, Ireland 258615, Agricultural Economics Society.
    14. Patricia Janosova, 2021. "Sustainable activities in manufacturing enterprises: Consumers’ expectations," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 91-101, March.
    15. Kelsey D. Meagher & Anne Gillman & David C. Campbell & Edward S. Spang, 2020. "Relational and Logistical Dimensions of Agricultural Food Recovery: Evidence from California Growers and Recovery Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    17. Marina Armendariz & Carolina Pérez-Ferrer & Ana Basto-Abreu & Gina S. Lovasi & Usama Bilal & Tonatiuh Barrientos-Gutiérrez, 2022. "Changes in the Retail Food Environment in Mexican Cities and Their Association with Blood Pressure Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Jeannette M. Blackmar, 2014. "Deliberative Democracy, Civic Engagement and Food Policy Councils," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 43-57.
    19. Etxano, Iker & Villalba-Eguiluz, Unai, 2021. "Twenty-five years of social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) in the search for sustainability: Analysis of case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    20. Muhammad Waqas & Qian-li Dong & Naveed Ahmad & Yuming Zhu & Muhammad Nadeem, 2018. "Critical Barriers to Implementation of Reverse Logistics in the Manufacturing Industry: A Case Study of a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:218:y:2024:i:c:s0921800923003592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.