IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctl/louvde/v90y2024i2p285-312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fertility, electricity and television: is there a link? Evidence from Pakistan, 1990–2018

Author

Listed:
  • Luca TASCIOTTI

    (Department of International Business and Economics, University of Greenwich)

  • Farooq Sulehria

    (Department of Liberal Arts, Beaconhouse National University)

  • Natascha Wagner

    (Institute for Management Research, Radboud University)

Abstract

In 1960s Pakistan, every woman was giving birth to more than 6 children on average. In 2021, Pakistan still has the second-highest fertility rate in South Asia with every woman giving birth to 3.4 children on average. This paper uses four waves of Demographic and Health Survey data to empirically analyze trends in fertility in Pakistan between 1990 and 2018; accounting for wealth, education and locational differences, this paper looks at three additional pathways for reducing fertility: (i) electrification, (ii) access to TV and (iii) family planning commercials broadcast on television. Results show that electricity does not reduce fertility whereas access to television has a significant effect in reducing fertility rates. The content and evolution of Pakistani soap-operas are also discussed, and it is argued that the role models, the types of households and the messages conveyed by these soap-operas may represent strong pathways for the fertility decline.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca TASCIOTTI & Farooq Sulehria & Natascha Wagner, 2024. "Fertility, electricity and television: is there a link? Evidence from Pakistan, 1990–2018," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 90(2), pages 285-312, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ctl:louvde:v:90:y:2024:i:2:p:285-312
    DOI: 10.1017/dem.2022.6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2022.6
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1017/dem.2022.6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctl:louvde:v:90:y:2024:i:2:p:285-312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sebastien SCHILLINGS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iruclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.