IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/interc/y2016i35p35-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'Utilisation De La Pensée Lean Dans Le Contexte De La Responsabilité Sociale De L'Entreprise

Author

Listed:
  • Sorin BRICIU

    (Université “1 Decembrie 1918” Alba Iulia)

  • Dimi OFILEANU

    (Université “1 Decembrie 1918” Alba Iulia)

Abstract

La responsabilité sociale est un concept toujours plus présent dans l'économie actuelle. Les préoccupations des entreprises dans ce domaine sont dues aux avantages apportés par la mise en pratique de ce concept à moyen et à long terme. Étant donné l'intérêt progressif manifesté envers la responsabilité sociale d'une part, vue comme facteur compétitif pour le succès d'une affaire, et de la pensée lean d'autre part, comme étant la plus importante philosophie de management de notre époque, le but de cet article est de présenter les deux concepts et d'analyser la relation d'entre eux. Les résultats de la recherche ont mis en évidence le fait que la littérature spécialisée offre des arguments forts concernant la relation d'entre la pensée lean et la responsabilité sociale, mais les entreprises qui ont mis en pratique la pensée lean dans leurs activités peuvent être considérées comme des entreprises socialement responsables.

Suggested Citation

  • Sorin BRICIU & Dimi OFILEANU, 2016. "L'Utilisation De La Pensée Lean Dans Le Contexte De La Responsabilité Sociale De L'Entreprise," Management Intercultural, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 35, pages 35-40, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:interc:y:2016:i:35:p:35-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/MI_35_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orsolya Pető, 2012. "Lean in the Aspect of Sustainability," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 8(01), pages 54-58.
    2. Raluca Miruna Zapciu & Gheorghe Hurduzeu, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility And Its Financial Performance," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 18(56), pages 201-213, June,.
    3. Wallace J. Hopp & Mark L. Spearman, 2004. "To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 133-148, August.
    4. Ion Botescu & Liliana Nicodim & Elena Condrea, 2008. "Business Ethics And The Social Responsability Of The Company," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(23), pages 131-135, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scherrer-Rathje, Maike & Boyle, Todd A. & Deflorin, Patricia, 2009. "Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 79-88.
    2. Miriam Pekarcikova & Peter Trebuna & Marek Kliment & Michal Dic, 2021. "Solution of Bottlenecks in the Logistics Flow by Applying the Kanban Module in the Tecnomatix Plant Simulation Software," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Kroes, James R. & Manikas, Andrew S. & Gattiker, Thomas F., 2018. "Operational leanness and retail firm performance since 1980," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 262-274.
    4. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    5. ARTENE, Alin, 2018. "Dobrogea School of Economics," SocArXiv hwn8a, Center for Open Science.
    6. Daniela D. Viana & Iris D. Tommelein & Carlos T. Formoso, 2017. "Using Modularity to Reduce Complexity of Industrialized Building Systems for Mass Customization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson & Ting Qu, 2017. "On the backlog-sequencing decision for extending the applicability of ConWIP to high-variety contexts: an assessment by simulation," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4695-4711, August.
    8. Wayne Fu & Basak Kalkanci & Ravi Subramanian, 2019. "Are Hazardous Substance Rankings Effective? An Empirical Investigation of Information Dissemination About the Relative Hazards of Chemicals and Emissions Reductions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 602-619, July.
    9. Nacu Teodora, 2022. "Brands that put the planet first: an analysis on how to be considered the most environmentally sustainable business in Europe," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 1188-1197, August.
    10. Roh, James & Hong, Paul & Min, Hokey, 2014. "Implementation of a responsive supply chain strategy in global complexity: The case of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 198-210.
    11. Wolfgang Seiringer & Balwin Bokor & Klaus Altendorfer, 2024. "Evaluating Production Planning and Control Systems in Different Environments: A Comparative Simulation Study," Papers 2405.02015, arXiv.org.
    12. Arnaldo Camuffo & Fabrizio Gerli, 2012. "What do lean managers do? Modeling management behaviors in lean production environments," Working Papers 13, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    13. Jos A. C. Bokhorst & Jannes Slomp, 2010. "Lean Production Control at a High-Variety, Low-Volume Parts Manufacturer," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 303-312, August.
    14. Ngai-Hang Z Leung & Ana Chen & Prashant Yadav & Jérémie Gallien, 2016. "The Impact of Inventory Management on Stock-Outs of Essential Drugs in Sub-Saharan Africa: Secondary Analysis of a Field Experiment in Zambia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Roberto Vona & Nadia Di Paola, 2014. "Lean thinking in sanit?: il caso della logistica degli approvvigionamenti e della distribuzione ospedaliera dei farmaci," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(91), pages 105-122.
    16. Muhammad Shafiq & Adeel Akhtar & Muhammad Ismail & Muhammad Awais, 2021. "Lean Management Readiness Assessment Framework For Humanitarian Organizations Supply Chain Management," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 10(3), pages 151-171, September.
    17. Huay Ling Tay & Prakash J. Singh & Vikram Bhakoo & Shahid Al-Balushi, 2017. "Contextual factors: assessing their influence on flow or resource efficiency orientations in healthcare lean projects," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 118-136, December.
    18. Ward Whitt, 2013. "OM Forum —Offered Load Analysis for Staffing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 166-169, May.
    19. Cadden, Trevor & Millar, Keith & Treacy, Raymond & Humphreys, Paul, 2020. "The mediating influence of organisational cultural practices in successful lean management implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    20. Robert D. Austin & Lee Devin, 2009. "Research Commentary ---Weighing the Benefits and Costs of Flexibility in Making Software: Toward a Contingency Theory of the Determinants of Development Process Design," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 462-477, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pensée Lean; Responsabilité sociale; Compétitivité;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:interc:y:2016:i:35:p:35-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.