IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jconsa/v56y2022i3p1244-1259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vaping and dynamic risk construction: Toward a model of adolescent risk‐related schema development

Author

Listed:
  • Emily C. Tanner
  • John F. Tanner
  • Franklin Velasco Vizcaino
  • Zhiyong Yang

Abstract

Adolescents experience vulnerability because their brains are not fully developed and they have limited knowledge and experience, inhibiting their ability to assess and mitigate risks. Drawing on literature from different disciplines, this paper develops a model that illustrates the dynamic nature of information and experience acquisition and ongoing risk and benefit assessment. New concepts are created to reflect better adolescent risk‐related schema: fungibility, fog of vulnerability, and points of tension, all of which are useful in understanding how intentions and in‐the‐moment decisions are made in the context of vaping.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily C. Tanner & John F. Tanner & Franklin Velasco Vizcaino & Zhiyong Yang, 2022. "Vaping and dynamic risk construction: Toward a model of adolescent risk‐related schema development," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1244-1259, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:56:y:2022:i:3:p:1244-1259
    DOI: 10.1111/joca.12470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12470
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joca.12470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wouter F. Visser & Walther N. Klerx & Hans W. J. M. Cremers & Ramon Ramlal & Paul L. Schwillens & Reinskje Talhout, 2019. "The Health Risks of Electronic Cigarette Use to Bystanders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Yang, Zhiyong & Netemeyer, Richard G., 2015. "Differential effects of parenting strategies on child smoking trajectories: A longitudinal assessment over twelve years," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1273-1282.
    3. Olivia A. Wackowski & Jennah M. Sontag & David Hammond & Richard J. O’Connor & Pamela A. Ohman-Strickland & Andrew A. Strasser & Andrea C. Villanti & Cristine D. Delnevo, 2019. "The Impact of E-Cigarette Warnings, Warning Themes and Inclusion of Relative Harm Statements on Young Adults’ E-Cigarette Perceptions and Use Intentions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Yang, Zhiyong & Floyd, Kristopher & Tanner, John F., 2019. "Effects of antismoking messages from media on adolescent smoking: The roles of family, school, and culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 222-231.
    5. George O. Rogers, 1997. "The Dynamics of Risk Perception: How Does Perceived Risk Respond to Risk Events?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(6), pages 745-757, December.
    6. Mehdi Mourali & Zhiyong Yang, 2013. "The Dual Role of Power in Resisting Social Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 539-554.
    7. Allison L. Groom & Thanh-Huyen T. Vu & Robyn L. Landry & Anshula Kesh & Joy L. Hart & Kandi L. Walker & Lindsey A. Wood & Rose Marie Robertson & Thomas J. Payne, 2021. "The Influence of Friends on Teen Vaping: A Mixed-Methods Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gentina, Elodie & Chen, Rui & Yang, Zhiyong, 2021. "Development of theory of mind on online social networks: Evidence from Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 652-666.
    2. Gwijeong Park & Fangxin Chen & Le Cheng, 2021. "A Study on the Millennials Usage Behavior of Social Network Services: Effects of Motivation, Density, and Centrality on Continuous Intention to Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Małgorzata Znyk & Joanna Jurewicz & Dorota Kaleta, 2021. "Exposure to Heated Tobacco Products and Adverse Health Effects, a Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Mourali, Mehdi & Yang, Zhiyong & Pons, Frank & Hassay, Derek, 2018. "Consumer power and choice deferral: The role of anticipated regret," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 81-99.
    5. Bernhard Swoboda & Carolina Sinning, 2021. "Endorsement of Global Product Brands by Global Corporate Brands – A Consumer Perspective Across Nations," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 563-598, August.
    6. Lasarov, Wassili & Mai, Robert & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2022. "The backfire effect of sustainable social cues. New evidence on social moral licensing," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. S. Elisha LePine & Elias M. Klemperer & Julia C. West & Catherine Peasley-Miklus & Caitlin McCluskey & Amanda Jones & Maria Roemhildt & Megan Trutor & Rhonda Williams & Andrea Villanti, 2022. "Exploring Definitions of “Addiction” in Adolescents and Young Adults and Correlation with Substance Use Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, June.
    8. Iuliana Armaş, 2006. "Earthquake Risk Perception in Bucharest, Romania," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1223-1234, October.
    9. Zhenyao Cai & Yimin Mao & Ting Gong & Ying Xin & Jiayun Lou, 2023. "The Effect of Servant Leadership on Work Resilience: Evidence from the Hospitality Industry during the COVID-19 Period," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Pabitra Chatterjee & Barthelemy Chollet & Olivier Trendel, 2017. "From conformity to reactance: Contingent role of network centrality in consumer-to-consumer influence," Post-Print hal-01589885, HAL.
    11. Danielle J Brick & Gràinne M Fitzsimons & Tanya L Chartrand & Gavan J Fitzsimons & Gita JoharEditor & Sharon ShavittAssociate Editor, 2018. "Coke vs. Pepsi: Brand Compatibility, Relationship Power, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(5), pages 991-1014.
    12. Ma, Jingjing & Mo, Zichuan & Gal, David, 2021. "The route to improve the effectiveness of negative PSAs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 669-682.
    13. Junji Urata & Adam J. Pel, 2018. "People's Risk Recognition Preceding Evacuation and Its Role in Demand Modeling and Planning," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 889-905, May.
    14. Chatterjee, Pabitra & Chollet, Barthélemy & Trendel, Olivier, 2017. "From conformity to reactance: Contingent role of network centrality in consumer-to-consumer influence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 86-94.
    15. Xuemei Fang & Liang Cao & Luyi Zhang & Binbin Peng, 2023. "Risk perception and resistance behavior intention of residents living near chemical industry parks: an empirical analysis in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1655-1675, January.
    16. Thomas Wilson & James Cole, 2007. "Potential impact of ash eruptions on dairy farms from a study of the effects on a farm in eastern Bay of Plenty, New Zealand; implications for hazard mitigation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 43(1), pages 103-128, October.
    17. Monika Pettersen-Sobczyk, 2023. "Social Media Influencer Marketing in the Food Industry: A Spatial Distribution of Research," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 246-260.
    18. Jill J. McCluskey & Gordon C. Rausser, 2001. "Estimation of Perceived Risk and Its Effect on Property Values," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(1), pages 42-55.
    19. Swoboda, Bernhard & Sinning, Carolina, 2020. "How country development and national culture affect the paths of perceived brand globalness to consumer behavior across nations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 58-73.
    20. Sungwoo Choi & Anna S. Mattila, 2018. "The Effect of Experience Congruity on Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Public Commitment," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 124-138, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jconsa:v:56:y:2022:i:3:p:1244-1259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-0078 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.