IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v14y2023i4p611-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Call the Bluff’ or ‘Build Back Better’—Anti‐corruption reforms in post‐war Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Martin Richter

Abstract

The fight against corruption is presented as a leading principle in policy papers and at donor conferences discussing Ukraine's reconstruction. It therefore mirrors the usual narrative surrounding post‐war reconstruction and democracy promotion attempts. However, reconstruction aid has historically been used for illicit means by elites and ended up strengthening an uneven system rather than building a resilient and successful country, despite the window of opportunity for the latter. Rather than just proposing principles, this paper therefore poses the question of how actors involved in the reconstruction process can be bound to stick to their previously propagated and formally existing principles. The analysis combines academic and policy‐oriented studies and highlights the combined importance of the external and internal dimension for a successful outcome. It proposes a ‘double conditionality’ mechanism, where an independent, technocratic institution holds frozen, Russian assets and partially reimburses Western donors only after successful audits on the reconstruction aid are conducted. This conditionality puts domestic pressure on aid givers to follow through with the anti‐corruption conditions formulated beforehand and to call out any reform bluff on Kyiv's side. Paired with a credible EU accession perspective, this can bring about the much‐needed stimulus for a build back better scenario.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Martin Richter, 2023. "‘Call the Bluff’ or ‘Build Back Better’—Anti‐corruption reforms in post‐war Ukraine," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(4), pages 611-622, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:4:p:611-622
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13251
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13251?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Martin Richter, 2023. "The Diversity of Actors in Reform Backsliding and Its Containment in the Ukrainian Hybrid Regime," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 5-15.
    2. Roberto Belloni & Francesco Strazzari, 2014. "Corruption in post-conflict Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo: a deal among friends," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 855-871, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haass, Felix & Ottmann, Martin, 2017. "Profits from Peace: The Political Economy of Power-Sharing and Corruption," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 60-74.
    2. Dogmus, Özge Can & Nielsen, Jonas Østergaard, 2020. "The on-paper hydropower boom: A case study of corruption in the hydropower sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Sofie Buch Mejsner & Leena Eklund Karlsson, 2017. "Informal Payments and Health System Governance in Serbia: A Pilot Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
    4. Adam Fagan & Indraneel Sircar, 2020. "Transformation All the Way Down? European Union Integration and the Professional Socialization of Municipal Health Officials in Serbia," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 688-705, May.
    5. Martin MENDELSKI, 2016. "The EU’s rule of law promotion in post-Soviet Europe: what explains the divergence between Baltic States and EaP countries?," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7, pages 111-144, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:4:p:611-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.