IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v13y2022is2p47-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legislating for Brexit: ‘The People’ versus Parliament?

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Cygan

Abstract

This article analyses the constitutional issues surrounding Parliament's implementation of the 2016 EU referendum result, in particular, the political and legal obligation of Parliament to give effect to the ‘will of the people’. Respecting the ‘will of the people’ lies at the core of any democratic process of government. But the predicament that faced MPs, who overwhelmingly voted ‘remain’ in the referendum, was to choose between their responsibilities as elected representatives and to implement the political mandate expressed through the exercise of direct democracy. Brexit, as the Miller I judgment confirms, alters the UK constitution by removing rights which UK and EU citizens enjoyed under the EU Treaties. In giving effect to Brexit, Parliament's constitutional relationship with the Executive, which had positioned itself politically as upholding the ‘will of the people’, was severely tested as the Cherry/Miller II prorogation judgment illustrates. Within a context of political turmoil and minority government, the Brexit process brought into sharp focus the conflict between what has been described as a ‘Whitehall versus Westminster’ interpretation of the relationship between Parliament and the Executive within the UK Constitution.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Cygan, 2022. "Legislating for Brexit: ‘The People’ versus Parliament?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(S2), pages 47-57, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:s2:p:47-57
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13066
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Cygan & Philip Lynch & Richard Whitaker, 2020. "UK Parliamentary Scrutiny of the EU Political and Legal Space after Brexit," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1605-1620, November.
    2. Dicey, Albert Venn, 1915. "Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, edition 8, number dicey1915.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Licht Amir N., 2008. "Social Norms and the Law: Why Peoples Obey the Law," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 715-750, December.
    2. Åsbjørn Melkevik, 2016. "No progressive taxation without discrimination? On the generality of the law in the classical liberal tradition," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 418-434, December.
    3. James A. Dorn, 2014. "Equality, Justice, and Freedom: A Constitutional Perspective," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 34(3), pages 491-517, Fall.
    4. Harris, Jose, 2010. "Citizenship in Britain and Europe: some missing links in T.H. Marshall's theory of rights," Working papers of the ZeS 02/2010, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    5. Licht, Amir N. & Goldschmidt, Chanan & Schwartz, Shalom H., 2007. "Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 659-688, December.
    6. Menkes Jerzy, 2018. "Custom in International Economic Law," Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 188-203, December.
    7. Bruce Yandle, 1993. "Sir Edward Coke and the struggle for a new constitutional order," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 263-285, March.
    8. James Dorn, 1991. "Madison's constitutional political economy: Principles for a liberal order," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 163-186, March.
    9. Shruti Rajagopalan, 2015. "Incompatible institutions: socialism versus constitutionalism in India," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 328-355, September.
    10. Catalin-Silviu Sararu, 2017. "Administrative litigation systems in Europe," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 7(1), pages 227-235, June.
    11. Shruti Rajagopalan & Richard Wagner, 2013. "Constitutional craftsmanship and the rule of law," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 295-309, December.
    12. Jennifer Huddleston, 2021. "Judicial engagement in classical Liberal public governance: a response and extension to Aligica, Boettke, and Tarko," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 34(3), pages 361-371, September.
    13. Matt Qvortrup, 2015. "New development: The courts and multi-level governance-some comparative perspectives on the emerging jurisprudence of the UK Supreme Court," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 57-61, January.
    14. James A. Dorn, 1990. "Introduction: Federalism and the Economic Order," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, Spring/Su.
    15. Lall B. Ramrattan & Michael Szenberg, 2017. "American Exceptionalism: An Appraisal—Political, Economic, Qualitative, and Quantitative," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 62(2), pages 222-246, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:13:y:2022:i:s2:p:47-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.