IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v30y2023i3p937-956.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women in public cultural organizations and their professional paths strategies: A rhizomatic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Góral

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explore the rhizomatic nature of the professional development strategies used by the female workforce of public cultural organizations. The research problem of this study are (1) the challenges of women who work in public cultural organizations and (2) ways of dealing with them by women. The empirical material was collected between January 2021 and January 2022 through 20 in‐depth interviews with female managers of public cultural organizations in Poland. The findings are presented in three sections: (1) specificity of work in culture, (2) twists and configurations on the way to grow, and (3) communities. In this way, it was possible to capture the specific strategies used by the female workforce for the development of their professional paths. To illustrate the complexity of these strategies, the concept of Rhizome—a root structure that grows in unpredictable and manifold directions—developed by Deleuze and Guattari was used. It also highlighted the fact that the professional development strategies used by women develop in a strong relationship with their environment and constantly evolve according to the needs of the women who decide to undertake them. The results of the research illustrate the impact of the far‐reaching gendered nature of work in cultural organizations on the professional development of women in this sector. Moreover, this reveals that to achieve their professional ambitions, women in cultural organizations co‐create complex informal organizational constructs, rhizome‐like in structure, which help women cope with the challenges that arise along their professional paths. These findings contribute to the theory of gendered organizations and the knowledge of gender inequality in cultural organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Góral, 2023. "Women in public cultural organizations and their professional paths strategies: A rhizomatic approach," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 937-956, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:30:y:2023:i:3:p:937-956
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12950
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12950?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Daskalaki & Oli Mould, 2013. "Beyond Urban Subcultures: Urban Subversions as Rhizomatic Social Formations," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Matthew Gandy, 2005. "Cyborg Urbanization: Complexity and Monstrosity in the Contemporary City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 26-49, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eduardo Ascensão, 2015. "The Slum Multiple: A Cyborg Micro-history of an Informal Settlement in Lisbon," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 948-964, September.
    2. Anke Schwarz & Monika Streule, 2016. "A Transposition of Territory: Decolonized Perspectives in Current Urban Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(5), pages 1000-1016, September.
    3. Edgar Pieterse, 2010. "Cityness and African Urban Development," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2010-042, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Rachel M. Shellabarger & Rachel C. Voss & Monika Egerer & Shun-Nan Chiang, 2019. "Challenging the urban–rural dichotomy in agri-food systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(1), pages 91-103, March.
    5. Robert A Beauregard, 0. "Do individual cities matter? Negotiating the particular," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(3), pages 593-603.
    6. Canoy, Nico A. & Robles, Augil Marie Q. & Roxas, Gilana Kim T., 2022. "Bodies-in-waiting as infrastructure: Assembling the Philippine Government's disciplinary quarantine response to COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    7. Simon Huston, 2012. "Smart Strategy: Intelligence, Gaming and Agility," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 4(3), pages 190-196, September.
    8. Stefano Bloch, 2016. "Why do Graffiti Writers Write on Murals? The Birth, Life, and Slow Death of Freeway Murals in Los Angeles," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 451-471, March.
    9. Ilaria Giglioli & Erik Swyngedouw, 2008. "Let's Drink to the Great Thirst! Water and the Politics of Fractured Techno‐natures in Sicily," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 392-414, June.
    10. Mattias De Backer, 2019. "Class, Style and Territory in the Drari Microcultures of Brussels," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Lugo, Adonia E., 2013. "CicLAvia and human infrastructure in Los Angeles: ethnographic experiments in equitable bike planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 202-207.
    12. Franciszek Chwałczyk, 2020. "Around the Anthropocene in Eighty Names—Considering the Urbanocene Proposition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-33, May.
    13. Chihsin Chiu, 2020. "Theorizing Public Participation and Local Governance in Urban Resilience: Reflections on the “Provincializing Urban Political Ecology” Thesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    14. COLIN McFARLANE, 2008. "Governing the Contaminated City: Infrastructure and Sanitation in Colonial and Post‐Colonial Bombay," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 415-435, June.
    15. Aidan H While & Simon Marvin & Mateja Kovacic, 2021. "Urban robotic experimentation: San Francisco, Tokyo and Dubai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(4), pages 769-786, March.
    16. Julie Gamble, 2017. "Experimental Infrastructure: Experiences in Bicycling in Quito, Ecuador," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 162-180, January.
    17. Pieterse, Edgar, 2010. "Cityness and African Urban Development," WIDER Working Paper Series 042, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Hanna Hilbrandt, 2019. "Everyday urbanism and the everyday state: Negotiating habitat in allotment gardens in Berlin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(2), pages 352-367, February.
    19. Andrés Luque-Ayala & Simon Marvin, 2015. "Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2105-2116, September.
    20. Morgan Mouton, 2021. "Worlding infrastructure in the global South: Philippine experiments and the art of being ‘smart’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 621-638, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:30:y:2023:i:3:p:937-956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.