IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v11y2024i4p680-686.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictors of Timing of First Antenatal Clinic: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Kiragu Ngigi

    (Department of Public Health, South Eastern Kenya University)

Abstract

World Health Organization recommends that pregnant mothers do the first antenatal visit within the 12 weeks after conception. The goal of the review was to determine the predictors of first antenatal visit. A systematic review was conducted by retrieving and reviewing several papers that had been published in various journals. Boolean internet search method was used. Comprehensive search was conducted through various data bases such as Cochrane library, Google scholar, AMED, EMBASE Scopus and PubMed. Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate studies on the risk of bias. Articles reviewed included those papers that were published from January 2010 to July 2023. The reviews of the publication were done between October and November 2023. Articles that report the timing of first antenatal care were included. Only papers published in English were included. All abstracts with information of first antenatal care were included and then the full articles were retrieved for review. Data extracted included ANC attendance level, antenatal utilization, factors contributing to first antenatal visit timing, reasons for late antenatal visit after 16 weeks. Extraction also included year of publication, study design and the area where the study was done. After thorough searching, 9132 published papers were accessed through a method known as Boolean internet search. The initial screening established 56 papers without abstracts and ended up with 9076 papers. In step two, 8712 publications were removed because of quality, lack of relevance to timing of first antenatal care, not in English language while other were overview articles. In step three, 330 papers were excluded for being not related to predictors of first timing of antenatal care. Only 34 articles were considered eligible for the systematic review after inclusion and exclusion criteria was added. Narrative data synthesis was used to analyze data extracted from articles retrieved as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results. Education appeared in 22 articles. Place of residence and distance were noted in 19 articles and 17 articles respectively. Several predictors of first antenatal visit were as follows: maternal age was observed in 21 articles, unplanned pregnancies (16), The level of attendance during first antenatal visit ranged from 47% to 57%. Conclusion Variables such as education, distance, quality of service complications of pregnancy and unplanned pregnancy were reported by many articles as predictors of early initiation of first antenatal visit. A big proportion of mothers do not utilize the first antenatal services. Recommendations it is recommended that awareness be created among communities on the importance of early antenatal visit.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Kiragu Ngigi, 2024. "Predictors of Timing of First Antenatal Clinic: A Systematic Review," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(4), pages 680-686, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:4:p:680-686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-11-issue-4/680-686.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/predictors-of-timing-of-first-antenatal-clinic-a-systematic-review/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:4:p:680-686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.