IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2022i5p33-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Nature of Social Entrepreneurship at the Present Stage

Author

Listed:
  • Halyna V. Kaplenko
  • Inna M. Kulish
  • Andrii V. Stasyshyn
  • Volodymyr Ya. Burak
  • Svitlana M. Synchuk

Abstract

The paper reveals that social entrepreneurship as a type of activity aimed at solving certain problems of society, first emerged in the former Soviet Union in the form of enterprises in the society of the blind; and, accordingly, in Ukraine, which at that time was part of the Soviet Union. These events took place more than fifty years earlier than in the United Kingdom, which is now considered the founding father of social enterprises. The conditions in which the first social enterprises were created and functioned, the influence of public administration and regulations on this process are shown, and it is shown how social enterprises created on the basis of humanism became an instrument of coercion by the state and thus lost their essence. The example of Costa Rica (first place in the world in the Happy Planet Index) and Norway (second place in the world in terms of Prosperity) shows that methods of supporting social entrepreneurship can range from full-fledged institutional support at all levels to almost complete lack of influence and control by the state. The existing classifications, features and concepts of social enterprises were analysed, mistakes made in the past were taken into account, and in particular, the need for non-discrimination was emphasised. And on this basis, the authors proposed to identify four features that are mandatory and relevant to each social enterprise. It is emphasised that none of the components of the “Triple Bottom Line” can be defined as the most important because they are all equally important. It is shown that a social enterprise is not identical to a charitable organisation. It has been established that a classic enterprise may have the characteristics of a social enterprise, but a social enterprise obligatory must have these characteristics in order to fulfil its mission. It has been shown that the same organisations can be sources of funding or social entrepreneurs, depending on what services it provides in specific conditions. The instruments of state support of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine are considered and it is shown that they are insufficient. The labour market and the number of people with disabilities in Ukraine are analysed, the existence of problems with the employment of people with special needs is shown and the need to strengthen state aegis and provision of regulatory and legal support for social entrepreneurship in Ukraine is emphasised. The obtained results are planned to be used in further research, which will relate to the opportunities for social entrepreneurship in the field of environmental services.

Suggested Citation

  • Halyna V. Kaplenko & Inna M. Kulish & Andrii V. Stasyshyn & Volodymyr Ya. Burak & Svitlana M. Synchuk, 2022. "Innovative Nature of Social Entrepreneurship at the Present Stage," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 33-45.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2022:i:5:p:33-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iki.bas.bg/Journals/EconomicStudies/2022/2022-5/03_Inna-Kulish.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. MariaLaura Di Domenico & Helen Haugh & Paul Tracey, 2010. "Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 681-703, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reypens, Lina & Bacq, Sophie & Milanov, Hana, 2021. "Beyond bricolage: Early-stage technology venture resource mobilization in resource-scarce contexts," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    2. Steffen Farny & Ewald Kibler & Solange Hai & Paolo Landoni, 2019. "Volunteer Retention in Prosocial Venturing: The Role of Emotional Connectivity," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(6), pages 1094-1123, November.
    3. Sahi, Gurjeet Kaur & Gupta, Mahesh C. & Cheng, T.C.E. & Mantok, Stanzin, 2021. "Mitigating the tension in pursuit of operational ambidexterity: The roles of knowledge development and bricolage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    4. Reeti Kulshrestha & Arunaditya Sahay & Subhanjan Sengupta, 2022. "Constituents and Drivers of Mission Engagement for Social Enterprise Sustainability: A Systematic Review," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 31(1), pages 90-120, March.
    5. Kay H. Hofmann & Axel Jacob & Massimo Pizzingrilli, 2022. "Overcoming Growth Challenges of Sustainable Ventures in the Fashion Industry: A Multinational Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Jørgensen, Matias Thuen & Hansen, Anne Vorre & Sørensen, Flemming & Fuglsang, Lars & Sundbo, Jon & Jensen, Jens Friis, 2021. "Collective tourism social entrepreneurship: A means for community mobilization and social transformation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    8. Mario Pansera & Fabien Martinez, 2017. "Innovation for development and poverty reduction: an integrative literature review," Post-Print hal-02887777, HAL.
    9. Stefan Gabriel BURCEA, 2020. "Can Social Entrepreneurship And Social Enterprises Stimulate The Sustainable Development Of Local Communities?," APPLIED RESEARCH IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 1(1), pages 17-23, August.
    10. Longinos Marín & Catalina Nicolás & Alicia Rubio, 2019. "How Gender, Age and Education Influence the Entrepreneur’s Social Orientation: The Moderating Effect of Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Baxter, Jamie Scott & Chatzichristos, Georgios & Christmann, Gabriela & Hennebry, Barraí & Kovanen, Sunna & Novikova, Marina & Olmedo, Lucas & Stoustrup, Sune W. & van Twuijver, Mara & Umantseva, Anna, 2020. "Social Enterprises in Structurally Weak Rural Regions: Innovative Troubleshooters in Action. Handbook for Practitioners," IRS Dialog 6/2020, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    12. Xueying Tian & Chunyang Zhao & Xiaochun Ge, 2022. "Entrepreneurial Traits, Relational Capital, and Social Enterprise Performance: Regulatory Effects of Cognitive Legitimacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Stefano Cosma & Alessandro G. Grasso & Francesco Pagliacci & Alessia Pedrazzoli, 2018. "Is Equity Crowdfunding a Good Tool for Social Enterprises?," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 18022, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    14. Gerard George & Rekha Rao-Nicholson & Christopher Corbishley & Rahul Bansal, 2015. "Institutional entrepreneurship, governance, and poverty: Insights from emergency medical response servicesin India," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 39-65, March.
    15. Rocío Aliaga-Isla & Benjamin Huybrechts, 2018. "From “Push Out” to “Pull In” Together : An Analysis of Social Entrepreneurship Definitions in the Academic Field," Post-Print hal-02312230, HAL.
    16. Agnieszka Żur, 2015. "Social Problems as Sources of Opportunity: Antecedents of Social Entrepreneurship Opportunities," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 3(4), pages 73-87.
    17. Bing Ran & Scott Weller, 2021. "An Exit Strategy for the Definitional Elusiveness: A Three-Dimensional Framework for Social Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Víctor Jesus García-Morales & Rodrigo Martín-Rojas & Raquel Garde-Sánchez, 2020. "How to Encourage Social Entrepreneurship Action? Using Web 2.0 Technologies in Higher Education Institutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 329-350, January.
    19. Muñoz, Pablo & Kibler, Ewald, 2016. "Institutional complexity and social entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1314-1318.
    20. Rishikesan Parthiban & Israr Qureshi & Somprakash Bandyopadhyay & Babita Bhatt & Saravana Jaikumar, 2020. "Leveraging ICT to Overcome Complementary Institutional Voids: Insights from Institutional Work by a Social Enterprise to Help Marginalized," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 633-653, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2022:i:5:p:33-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.