IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/top/old/1605/top.usa-co.html
 

Top 25% Institutions and Economists in Colorado (United States), as of May 2016

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Colorado (United States), there are 94 authors affiliated with 20 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to the weights they have set to each in their profile, or by default according to a formula described here.

All institutions in this region.

Rankings for the United States and links to state rankings are available here.

Top 25% institutions in Colorado (United States)

RankW.RankInstitutionScoreAuthorsAuthor shares
1[1]Department of Economics, University of Colorado

Boulder, Colorado (USA)

13128.24
2[2]Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines

Golden, Colorado (USA)

2.071110.9
3[3]Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University

Fort Collins, Colorado (USA)

3.231110.9
4[4]Economics Department, University of Colorado Denver

Denver, Colorado (USA)

3.8632.9
5[5]Business School, University of Colorado Denver

Denver, Colorado (USA)

4.832.19

Top 25% authors in Colorado (United States)

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC.
RankW.RankAuthorScore
1[1]James R. Markusen

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

1.11
2[3]Keith E. Maskus

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

2.65
3[5]Yongmin Chen

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

2.96
4[6]John Loomis

Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins

6.39
5[2]Wolfgang Keller

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

7.17
6[8]Daniel I. Rees

Economics Department, University of Colorado Denver, Denver

7.75
7[9]John T. Cuddington

Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden

8.26
8[7]Murat F. Iyigun

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

9.77
9[12]Charles de Bartolome

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

12.45
10[10]Jeffrey Zax

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

12.57
11[11]Philip E. Graves

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

12.9
12[13]Carol A. Dahl

Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden

13.2
13[16]Edward J. Balistreri

Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden

14.15
14[14]Jian Yang

Business School, University of Colorado Denver, Denver

14.26
15[19]Edward R. Morey

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

14.44
16[17]Jack Strauss

Daniels School of Business, University of Denver, Denver

14.79
17[21]Nicholas E. Flores

Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

15.34
18[18]Haider Khan

15.74
19[20]Graham Anthony Davis

Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines, Golden

18.12
20[25]William H. Kaempfer

Carl McGuire Center for International Studies, Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder

19.05
21[22]Edwin Woodrow Eckard

Business School, University of Colorado Denver, Denver

19.41
22[24]Liang Peng

Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado, Boulder

20.78
23[23]John Elder

Department of Finance and Real Estate, Colorado State University, Fort Collins

20.97

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.