Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Top 25% Institutions and Economists in Philippines, as of February 2014

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Philippines, there are 91 authors affiliated with 18 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to the weights they have set to each in their profile, or by default according to a formula described here.

All institutions in this region.

Top 25% institutions in Philippines

RankW.RankInstitutionScoreAuthorsAuthor shares
1[1]School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman

Quezon City, Philippines

1.242623.38
2[2]Asian Development Bank

Manila, Philippines

1.573126.33
3[4]Division of Social Science and Economics, Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR)

Laguna/Los Banos, Philippines

3.6954.5
---[---]Economics and Research Department, Asian Development Bank

Manila, Philippines

4.5544
4[3]Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Government of the Philippines

Makati City, Philippines

4.77108.56

Top 25% authors in Philippines

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in EDIRC.
RankW.RankAuthorScore
1[1]Charles Yuji Horioka

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

1.48
2[2]Guanghua Wan

Asian Development Bank, Manila

2.82
3[5]Delano Segundo Villanueva

Angelo King Institute, Pamantasan ng De La Salle, Manila
Departamento ng Ekonomiks, Pamantasan ng De La Salle, Manila
Bangko Sentral Ng Pilipinas, Manilla

3.01
4[6]Takashi Yamano

Division of Social Science and Economics, Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Laguna/Los Banos

5.05
5[9]Utsav Kumar

Economics and Research Department, Asian Development Bank, Manila

6.33
6[4]Jayant Menon

Office of Regional Economic Integration, Asian Development Bank, Manila

6.89
7[7]Arsenio Balisacan

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

7.6
8[10]Donghyun Park

Asian Development Bank, Manila

9.12
9[15]Raul V. Fabella

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

9.53
10[11]Aniceto Cubil Orbeta Jr.

Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Government of the Philippines, Makati City

10.03
11[13]Ronald U. Mendoza

Policy Center, Asian Institute of Management, Makati City

10.42
12[3]James A. Roumasset

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

12.02
13[12]Iris Claus

Asian Development Bank, Manila

12.24
14[18]Akiko Terada- Hagiwara

Asian Development Bank, Manila

12.77
15[20]Cyn-Young Park

Asian Development Bank, Manila

12.81
16[22]Jose Encarnacion Jr.

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

15.69
17[19]Ernesto M. Pernia

School of Economics, University of the Philippines at Diliman, Quezon City

16.9
18[21]Matty Demont

Division of Social Science and Economics, Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Laguna/Los Banos

16.99
19[25]Vicente Paqueo

Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Government of the Philippines, Makati City

17.27
20[17]Edsel L. Beja Jr.

Department of Economics, Ateneo de Manila University, Manila

18.07
21[23]Minsoo Lee

Asian Development Bank, Manila

19.05
22[16]Rafaelita Mercado Aldaba

Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Government of the Philippines, Makati City

19.15

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.