IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/cup/intorg/v68y2014i03p633-661_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

External Rebel Sponsorship and Civilian Abuse: A Principal-Agent Analysis of Wartime Atrocities

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Emily Kalah Gade & Michael Gabbay & Mohammed M. Hafez & Zane Kelly, 2019. "Networks of Cooperation: Rebel Alliances in Fragmented Civil Wars," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(9), pages 2071-2097, October.
  2. Tim Heinkelmann-Wild & Marius Mehrl, 2022. "Indirect Governance at War: Delegation and Orchestration in Rebel Support," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(1), pages 115-143, January.
  3. Lindsay L. Heger & Danielle F. Jung, 2017. "Negotiating with Rebels," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(6), pages 1203-1229, July.
  4. Leonardo R. Arriola & David A. Dow & Aila M. Matanock & Michaela Mattes, 2021. "Policing Institutions and Post-Conflict Peace," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(10), pages 1738-1763, November.
  5. Karin Johansson & Mehwish Sarwari, 2019. "Sexual violence and biased military interventions in civil conflict1," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(5), pages 469-493, September.
  6. Mark D. Ramirez & Reed M. Wood, 2019. "Public Attitudes toward Private Military Companies: Insights from Principal–agent Theory," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(6), pages 1433-1459, July.
  7. Daniel Krcmaric, 2018. "Varieties of civil war and mass killing," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(1), pages 18-31, January.
  8. Miguel R. Rueda, 2017. "Popular Support, Violence, and Territorial Control in Civil War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(8), pages 1626-1652, September.
  9. Jori Breslawski, 2021. "The Social Terrain of Rebel Held Territory," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(2-3), pages 453-479, February.
  10. Böhmelt Tobias & Dworschak Christoph & Pilster Ulrich & Walterskirchen Julian, 2020. "A Cross-National Analysis of Forced Population Resettlement in Counterinsurgency Campaigns," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 26(1), pages 1-13, February.
  11. Virginia Page Fortna, 2023. "Is Terrorism Really a Weapon of the Weak? Debunking the Conventional Wisdom," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(4), pages 642-671, April.
  12. Mercier, Marion & Silve, Arthur & Tremblay-Auger, Benjamin, 2023. "Building Reputation: Proxy Wars and Transnational Identities," IZA Discussion Papers 16340, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  13. Justin Conrad & Liana Eustacia Reyes & Megan A. Stewart, 2022. "Revisiting Opportunism in Civil Conflict: Natural Resource Extraction and Health Care Provision," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(1), pages 91-114, January.
  14. Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl, 2020. "On-Side fighting in civil war: The logic of mortal alignment in Syria," Rationality and Society, , vol. 32(4), pages 402-460, November.
  15. David S Siroky & Milos Popovic & Nikola Mirilovic, 2021. "Unilateral secession, international recognition, and great power contestation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(5), pages 1049-1067, September.
  16. Reed M. Wood, 2014. "Opportunities to kill or incentives for restraint? Rebel capabilities, the origins of support, and civilian victimization in civil war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 31(5), pages 461-480, November.
  17. Mitchell Radtke & Hyeran Jo, 2018. "Fighting the Hydra," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(6), pages 759-773, November.
  18. Reyko Huang & Patricia L Sullivan, 2021. "Arms for education? External support and rebel social services," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(4), pages 794-808, July.
  19. Roos Haer & Babak RezaeeDaryakenari, 2022. "Disasters and civilian victimization: Exploring the dynamic effect in Africa, 1997–2017," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(1), pages 43-57, January.
  20. Lisa Hultman & Dursun Peksen, 2017. "Successful or Counterproductive Coercion? The Effect of International Sanctions on Conflict Intensity," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(6), pages 1315-1339, July.
  21. Sara MT Polo, 2020. "The quality of terrorist violence: Explaining the logic of terrorist target choice," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(2), pages 235-250, March.
  22. James Igoe Walsh & Justin M Conrad & Beth Elise Whitaker & Katelin M Hudak, 2018. "Funding rebellion," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 55(5), pages 699-707, September.
  23. Ji Yeon Hong & Wenhui Yang, 2022. "Conditional cross-border effects of terrorism in China," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(3), pages 266-290, May.
  24. Yuri M. Zhukov & Charles H. Anderton & Jurgen Brauer, "undated". "On the Logistics of Violence," Working Paper 255276, Harvard University OpenScholar.
  25. Mario Krauser, 2020. "In the Eye of the Storm: Rebel Taxation of Artisanal Mines and Strategies of Violence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(10), pages 1968-1993, November.
  26. Karell, Daniel & Freedman, Michael Raphael, 2019. "Rhetorics of Radicalism," SocArXiv yfzsh, Center for Open Science.
  27. Michael C. Marshall, 2019. "Foreign Rebel Sponsorship: A Patron–Client Analysis of Party Viability in Elections Following Negotiated Settlements," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(2), pages 555-584, February.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.