IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pne275.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Sarah Neubauer

Personal Details

First Name:Sarah
Middle Name:
Last Name:Neubauer
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pne275
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
The above email address does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Sarah Neubauer to update the entry or send us the correct address or status for this person. Thank you.

Affiliation

Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH)
Leibniz Universität Hannover

Hannover, Germany
http://www.cherh.de/
RePEc:edi:cherhde (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Neubauer, Sarah & Zeidler, Jan & Lange, Ansgar & Graf von der Schulenburg, J.-Matthias, 2014. "Grundlagen und Methoden von GKV-Routinedatenstudien," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-534, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.

Articles

  1. Sarah Neubauer & Kristine Kreis & Mike Klora & Jan Zeidler, 2017. "Access, use, and challenges of claims data analyses in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(5), pages 533-536, June.
  2. Kreis, Kristine & Neubauer, Sarah & Klora, Mike & Lange, Ansgar & Zeidler, Jan, 2016. "Status and perspectives of claims data analyses in Germany—A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 213-226.
  3. Ansgar Lange & Anne Prenzler & Oliver Bachmann & Roland Linder & Sarah Neubauer & Jan Zeidler & Michael Manns & J.-Matthias von der Schulenburg, 2015. "Regional differences in health care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Germany," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Neubauer, Sarah & Zeidler, Jan & Lange, Ansgar & Graf von der Schulenburg, J.-Matthias, 2014. "Grundlagen und Methoden von GKV-Routinedatenstudien," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-534, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.

    Cited by:

    1. Kreis, Kristine & Neubauer, Sarah & Klora, Mike & Lange, Ansgar & Zeidler, Jan, 2016. "Status and perspectives of claims data analyses in Germany—A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 213-226.
    2. Jan Breitkreuz & Gabriela Brückner & Jan Pablo Burgard & Joscha Krause & Ralf Münnich & Helmut Schröder & Katrin Schüssel, 2019. "Schätzung kleinräumiger Krankheitshäufigkeiten für die deutsche Bevölkerung anhand von Routinedaten am Beispiel von Typ-2-Diabetes [Estimation of regional diabetes type 2 prevalence in the German p," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 13(1), pages 35-72, April.
    3. Ehing, Daniel & Hagist, Christian, 2015. "Dementia vs. somatic conditions in the German LTC-system: A longitudinal analysis," FZG Discussion Papers 56, University of Freiburg, Research Center for Generational Contracts (FZG).

Articles

  1. Sarah Neubauer & Kristine Kreis & Mike Klora & Jan Zeidler, 2017. "Access, use, and challenges of claims data analyses in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(5), pages 533-536, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Boris A. Brühmann & Klaus Kaier & Rieka Warth & Erik Farin-Glattacker, 2023. "Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(8), pages 1343-1355, November.
    2. Udo Schneider & Andreas Schmid & Roland Linder & Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag & Frank Verheyen, 2018. "The Choice of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implementation (TAVI): Do Patient Co-morbidity and Hospital Ownership Type Matter?," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 735-744, October.
    3. Fränce Hardtstock & Zeki Kocaata & Thomas Wilke & Axel Dittmar & Marco Ghiani & Vasily Belozeroff & David J. Harrison & Ulf Maywald & Hans Tesch, 2021. "Healthcare resource utilization and associated cost of patients with bone metastases from solid tumors who are naïve to bone-targeting agents: a comparative analysis of patients with and without skele," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(2), pages 243-254, March.
    4. Johanna Callhoff & Hannes Jacobs & Katinka Albrecht & Joachim Saam & Angela Zink & Falk Hoffmann, 2020. "Factors Associated with Survey Non-Response in a Cross-Sectional Survey of Persons with an Axial Spondyloarthritis or Osteoarthritis Claims Diagnosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.

  2. Kreis, Kristine & Neubauer, Sarah & Klora, Mike & Lange, Ansgar & Zeidler, Jan, 2016. "Status and perspectives of claims data analyses in Germany—A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 213-226.

    Cited by:

    1. Boris A. Brühmann & Klaus Kaier & Rieka Warth & Erik Farin-Glattacker, 2023. "Cost–benefit analysis of the CoCare intervention to improve medical care in long-term care nursing homes: an analysis based on claims data," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(8), pages 1343-1355, November.
    2. Katharina Kähm & Michael Laxy & Udo Schneider & Rolf Holle, 2019. "Exploring Different Strategies of Assessing the Economic Impact of Multiple Diabetes-Associated Complications and Their Interactions: A Large Claims-Based Study in Germany," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 63-74, January.
    3. Stefanie March, 2017. "Individual Data Linkage of Survey Data with Claims Data in Germany—An Overview Based on a Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Johanna Callhoff & Hannes Jacobs & Katinka Albrecht & Joachim Saam & Angela Zink & Falk Hoffmann, 2020. "Factors Associated with Survey Non-Response in a Cross-Sectional Survey of Persons with an Axial Spondyloarthritis or Osteoarthritis Claims Diagnosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Sarah Neubauer & Kristine Kreis & Mike Klora & Jan Zeidler, 2017. "Access, use, and challenges of claims data analyses in Germany," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(5), pages 533-536, June.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 1 paper announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-GER: German Papers (1) 2014-09-25

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Sarah Neubauer should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.