IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esconf/196182.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Creating shared value through implementing vocational rehabilitation in the corporate social responsibility strategy: A literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Miethlich, Boris
  • Šlahor, Ľudomír

Abstract

After an accident or illness, it may be difficult or even impossible to return to work. Although occupational safety and health (OHS) are essential elements of corporate social responsibility (CSR), support for employees returning to work or vocational rehabilitation are rarely part of the CSR strategy. The aim of this paper is to assess and synthesize the current state of research of vocational rehabilitation in the context of CSR. A literature analysis was conducted to examine the need to address vocational rehabilitation as part of the CSR strategy as well as the existing approaches for implementation. Vocational rehabilitation is an important part of a company's social responsibility towards its employees as well as towards society. The promotion of vocational rehabilitation should be an essential element of the CSR strategy and can create shared value. However, a commitment to vocational rehabilitation alone is not enough; the commitment must be explicitly described and go beyond the legal minimum. That can be done, for example, through return-to-work (RTW) policies, proactive initiation and coordination of the rehabilitation process, the adaptation of the workplace and work activities, the institutionalization of sheltered workplaces, and a specialist unit for vocational rehabilitation within the company. Particularly access for external persons to the company's sheltered workplaces, internships or entry-level positions is a critical aspect for substantially promoting vocational rehabilitation and achieving additional shared value. Vocational rehabilitation as part of the CSR strategy must continue to be examined empirically, in particular "best practice" approaches from business practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Miethlich, Boris & Šlahor, Ľudomír, 2018. "Creating shared value through implementing vocational rehabilitation in the corporate social responsibility strategy: A literature review," EconStor Conference Papers 196182, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esconf:196182
    DOI: 10.33543/16001.14441460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/196182/1/ibima32_miethlich2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.33543/16001.14441460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christa Thomsen & Jakob Lauring, 2008. "Practicing the business of corporate social responsibility: a process perspective," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 117-131.
    2. Codruţa Dura, 2014. "Occupational health and safety integration in corporate social responsibility policies within B.R.D. - G.S.G. Romania," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 59-70.
    3. Andrew Dean, 2013. "Tackling Long-Term Unemployment Amongst Vulnerable Groups," OECD Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED) Papers 2013/11, OECD Publishing.
    4. Baril, R. & Clarke, J. & Friesen, M. & Stock, S. & Cole, D., 2003. "Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(11), pages 2101-2114, December.
    5. Brian Bell & James Smith, 2004. "Health, disability insurance and labour force participation," Bank of England working papers 218, Bank of England.
    6. Susan Hart, 2010. "Self-regulation, Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Business Case: Do they Work in Achieving Workplace Equality and Safety?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(4), pages 585-600, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miethlich, Boris & Oldenburg, Anett G., 2019. "Social Inclusion Drives Business Sales: A Literature Review on the Case of the Employment of Persons With Disabilities," EconStor Conference Papers 200752, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    2. Olga V. Tolstyakova & Nazygul T. Batyrova, 2020. "Strategic management of human resources in modern conditions: a case study," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 370-381, December.
    3. Miethlich, Boris & Oldenburg, Anett G., 2019. "Employment of Persons with Disabilities as Competitive Advantage: An Analysis of the Competitive Implications," EconStor Conference Papers 200751, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Ståhl & Ellen MacEachen & Katherine Lippel, 2014. "Ethical Perspectives in Work Disability Prevention and Return to Work: Toward a Common Vocabulary for Analyzing Stakeholders’ Actions and Interactions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(2), pages 237-250, March.
    2. Christina Beatty & Stephen Fothergill, 2005. "The diversion from 'unemployment' to 'sickness' across British regions and districts," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 837-854.
    3. Richard Berthoud, 2008. "Disability employment penalties in Britain," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 22(1), pages 129-148, March.
    4. Katharina Spraul & Julia Thaler, 2020. "Partnering for good? An analysis of how to achieve sustainability-related outcomes in public–private partnerships," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 485-511, July.
    5. Helen LaVan & Lori S. Cook & Ivana Zilic, 2021. "An analysis of the ethical frameworks and financial outcomes of corporate social responsibility and business press reporting of US pharmaceutical companies," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 326-355.
    6. Ehsanul Huda Chowdhury & Brita Backlund Rambaree & Gloria Macassa, 2021. "CSR Reporting of Stakeholders’ Health: Proposal for a New Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-10, January.
    7. Daniella Troje & Pernilla Gluch, 2020. "Beyond Policies and Social Washing: How Social Procurement Unfolds in Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Hamish Low & Luigi Pistaferri, 2020. "Disability Insurance: Theoretical Trade‐Offs and Empirical Evidence," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 129-164, March.
    9. Jennifer Roberts & Karl Taylor, 2022. "New Evidence on Disability Benefit Claims in Britain: The Role of Health and the Local Labour Market," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(353), pages 131-160, January.
    10. Maria Guti'rrez-DomSnech & Brian Bell, 2004. "Female labour force participation in the United Kingdom: evolving characteristics or changing behaviour?," Bank of England working papers 221, Bank of England.
    11. Arnaldo Camuffo & Federica Stefano & Chiara Paolino, 2017. "Safety Reloaded: Lean Operations and High Involvement Work Practices for Sustainable Workplaces," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 245-259, June.
    12. Danacica, Daniela Emanuela & Cirnu, Doru, 2014. "Unemployment Duration and Exit States of Disabled People in Romania," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 35-52, March.
    13. Gallardo-Vázquez, Dolores & Sánchez-Hernández, María Isabel & Corchuelo-Martinez-Azua, María Beatriz, 2013. "Validación de un instrumento de medida para la relación entre la orientación a la responsabilidad social corporativa y otras variables estratégicas de la empresa," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-23.
    14. Georgeta Soava & Anca Mehedințu & Sorin Popa, 2016. "Role of CSR on the Digital Single Market from the Standpoint of Romania," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 253-264.
    15. Faggio, Giulia & Nickell, Stephen, 2005. "Inactivity among prime age men in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19912, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Mark Schweitzer & David Tinsley, 2004. "The UK labour force participation rate: business cycle and trend influences," Bank of England working papers 228, Bank of England.
    17. Roberts, Jennifer & Taylor, Karl, 2019. "New Evidence on Disability Benefit Claims in the UK: The Role of Health and the Local Labour Market," IZA Discussion Papers 12825, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Duncan McVicar, 2008. "Why Have Uk Disability Benefit Rolls Grown So Much?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 114-139, February.
    19. Ernesto D’Avanzo & Mariangela Franch & Elio Borgonovi, 2021. "Ethics and Sustainable Management. An Empirical Modelling of Carroll’s Pyramid for the Italian Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Jason Foster & Bob Barnetson & Jared Matsunaga-Turnbull, 2018. "Fear Factory: Retaliation and Rights Claiming in Alberta, Canada," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    vocational rehabilitation; disability management; shared value; CSR;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esconf:196182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.