IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/dzimps/277891.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effektiv und mehrheitsfähig? Der Emissionshandel auf dem Prüfstand

Author

Listed:
  • Huwe, Vera
  • Krahé, Max
  • Sigl-Glöckner, Philippa

Abstract

Große Teile der ökonomischen Forschung favorisieren die CO2 -Bepreisung als Hauptinstrument der Dekarbonisierung. CO2 -Bepreisung kann in Form einer CO2 -Steuer oder eines Emissionshandels umgesetzt werden. Seit 2005 setzt die EU in der Klimapolitik auf den Europäischen Emissionshandel (EU-ETS) als Hauptinstrument. Der Emissionshandel spielt auch bei neuen Plänen der EU-Kommission für die Klimapolitik bis 2030 ("Fit for 55"), zu welchen sich auch die mögliche Ampel-Koalition in Deutschland in ihrem Sondierungspapier bekennt, eine zentrale Rolle.¹ Dieses Papier erläutert zunächst die theoretische Funktionsweise des Emissionshandels. Aufbauend auf der jüngsten empirischen Evidenz wird anschließend gezeigt, dass der Europäische Emissionshandel bisher das Ziel verfehlt hat, Europa auf einen mit der 1,5-Grad-Grenze kompatiblen Emissionspfad zu bewegen. Um die 1,5-Grad-Grenze einzuhalten, wäre es notwendig, die Effektivität klimapolitischer Instrumente bedeutend zu erhöhen. Wenn am Emissionshandel als Hauptinstrument festgehalten werden soll, sind Anpassungen auf drei Ebenen gefragt: bei den politischen Vorgaben, bei der Umsetzung und in der Auswahl zusätzlicher Instrumente.

Suggested Citation

  • Huwe, Vera & Krahé, Max & Sigl-Glöckner, Philippa, 2021. "Effektiv und mehrheitsfähig? Der Emissionshandel auf dem Prüfstand," Papers 277891, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:dzimps:277891
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/277891/1/1859900216.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakob, Michael & Chen, Claudine & Fuss, Sabine & Marxen, Annika & Rao, Narasimha D. & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2016. "Carbon Pricing Revenues Could Close Infrastructure Access Gaps," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 254-265.
    2. Tvinnereim, Endre & Mehling, Michael, 2018. "Carbon pricing and deep decarbonisation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 185-189.
    3. Martin C. Hänsel & Moritz A. Drupp & Daniel J. A. Johansson & Frikk Nesje & Christian Azar & Mark C. Freeman & Ben Groom & Thomas Sterner, 2020. "Climate economics support for the UN climate targets," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(8), pages 781-789, August.
    4. Kevin Anderson & John F. Broderick & Isak Stoddard, 2020. "A factor of two: how the mitigation plans of ‘climate progressive’ nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(10), pages 1290-1304, November.
    5. Kuhnhenn, Kai & da Costa, Luís Fílípe Carvalho & Mahnke, Eva & Schneider, Lisa & Lange, Steffen, 2020. "A societal transformation scenario for staying below 1.5°C," Schriften zu Wirtschaft und Soziales, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung e.V., Berlin, volume 23, number 23.
    6. Yannick Oswald & Anne Owen & Julia K. Steinberger, 2020. "Publisher Correction: Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 349-349, April.
    7. Unruh, Gregory C., 2000. "Understanding carbon lock-in," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(12), pages 817-830, October.
    8. Daniel Rosenbloom & Adrian Rinscheid, 2020. "Deliberate decline: An emerging frontier for the study and practice of decarbonization," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(6), November.
    9. Yannick Oswald & Anne Owen & Julia K. Steinberger, 2020. "Large inequality in international and intranational energy footprints between income groups and across consumption categories," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 231-239, March.
    10. Ian Gough, 2015. "Climate change and sustainable welfare: the centrality of human needs," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 39(5), pages 1191-1214.
    11. Johan Lilliestam & Anthony Patt & Germán Bersalli, 2021. "The effect of carbon pricing on technological change for full energy decarbonization: A review of empirical ex‐post evidence," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), January.
    12. Barbara Haya & Danny Cullenward & Aaron L. Strong & Emily Grubert & Robert Heilmayr & Deborah A. Sivas & Michael Wara, 2020. "Managing uncertainty in carbon offsets: insights from California’s standardized approach," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1112-1126, October.
    13. Ottmar Edenhofer & Matthias Kalkuhl & Christina Roolfs, 2021. "Carbon Pricing and Revenue Recycling: An Overview of Vertical and Horizontal Equity Effects for Germany," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 22(05), pages 10-14, September.
    14. Noah Kaufman & Alexander R. Barron & Wojciech Krawczyk & Peter Marsters & Haewon McJeon, 2020. "A near-term to net zero alternative to the social cost of carbon for setting carbon prices," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(11), pages 1010-1014, November.
    15. Frick, Marc & Huwe, Vera, 2020. "Klimapolitik zwischen Markt, Deliberation und Hegemonie: Der Emissionshandel und das Politische," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-060, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Jochen Markard & Daniel Rosenbloom, 2020. "Political conflict and climate policy: the European emissions trading system as a Trojan Horse for the low-carbon transition?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(9), pages 1092-1111, October.
    17. Heindl, Peter & Schüßler, Rudolf, 2019. "A deprivation-based assessment of energy poverty: Conceptual problems and application to Germany," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-036, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    18. Dan Tong & Qiang Zhang & Yixuan Zheng & Ken Caldeira & Christine Shearer & Chaopeng Hong & Yue Qin & Steven J. Davis, 2019. "Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize 1.5 °C climate target," Nature, Nature, vol. 572(7769), pages 373-377, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huwe, Vera & Steitz, Janek & Sigl-Glöckner, Philippa, 2022. "Kommunale Klimaschutzinvestitionen und deren Finanzierung: Eine Fallstudienanalyse," Papers 277902, Dezernat Zukunft - Institute for Macrofinance, Berlin.
    2. Moritz A. Drupp & Ulrike Kornek & Jasper N. Meya & Lutz Sager, 2021. "Inequality and the Environment: The Economics of a Two-Headed Hydra," CESifo Working Paper Series 9447, CESifo.
    3. Richard Bärnthaler & Andreas Novy & Leonhard Plank, 2021. "The Foundational Economy as a Cornerstone for a Social–Ecological Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Bärnthaler, Richard & Gough, Ian, 2023. "Provisioning for sufficiency: envisaging production corridors," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119420, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Bäuerle, Max Juri, 2022. "Striving for low-carbon lifestyles: An analysis of the mobility patterns of different urban household types with regard to emissions reductions in a real-world lab experiment in Berlin," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2022-601, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Yuru Guan & Jin Yan & Yuli Shan & Yannan Zhou & Ye Hang & Ruoqi Li & Yu Liu & Binyuan Liu & Qingyun Nie & Benedikt Bruckner & Kuishuang Feng & Klaus Hubacek, 2023. "Burden of the global energy price crisis on households," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(3), pages 304-316, March.
    7. Pottier, Antonin, 2022. "Expenditure elasticity and income elasticity of GHG emissions: A survey of literature on household carbon footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    8. Li, Jiajia & Li, Houjian, 2022. "Spiritual support or living support: Which alleviates solid fuel use for rural households in ethnical minority regions of China?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 479-491.
    9. Brand-Correa, Lina I. & Steinberger, Julia K., 2017. "A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 43-52.
    10. Martín Lallana & Adrián Almazán & Alicia Valero & Ángel Lareo, 2021. "Assessing Energy Descent Scenarios for the Ecological Transition in Spain 2020–2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    11. Shady Attia, 2020. "Spatial and Behavioral Thermal Adaptation in Net Zero Energy Buildings: An Exploratory Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Hongliang Zhang & Jianhong E. Mu & Bruce A. McCarl & Jialing Yu, 2022. "The impact of climate change on global energy use," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Tallgauer, Maximilian & Schank, Christoph, 2024. "Challenging the growth-prosperity Nexus: Redefining undergraduate economics education for the Anthropocene," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    14. Kemfert, Claudia & Präger, Fabian & Braunger, Isabell & Hoffart, Franziska M. & Brauers, Hanna, 2022. "The expansion of natural gas infrastructure puts energy transitions at risk," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7, pages 582-587.
    15. Jacksohn, Anke & Tovar Reaños, Miguel Angel & Pothen, Frank & Rehdanz, Katrin, 2023. "Trends in household demand and greenhouse gas footprints in Germany: Evidence from microdata of the last 20 years," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. Ferreira, João-Pedro & Marques, João Lourenço & Moreno Pires, Sara & Iha, Katsunori & Galli, Alessandro, 2023. "Supporting national-level policies for sustainable consumption in Portugal: A socio-economic Ecological Footprint analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    17. Marlyne Sahakian & Malaïka Nagel & Valentine Donzelot & Orlane Moynat & Wladyslaw Senn, 2021. "Flying Less for Work and Leisure? Co-Designing a City-Wide Change Initiative in Geneva," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 299-313.
    18. Sugandha Srivastav & Ryan Rafaty, 2023. "Political Strategies to Overcome Climate Policy Obstructionism," Papers 2304.14960, arXiv.org.
    19. Ying Pan & Ke Shi & Zhongxu Zhao & Yao Li & Junxi Wu, 2024. "The effects of China’s poverty eradication program on sustainability and inequality," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Liao, Hua & Peng, Ying & Wang, Fang-Zhi & Zhang, Tong, 2022. "Understanding energy use growth: The role of investment-GDP ratio," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 15-24.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:dzimps:277891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.dezernatzukunft.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.