IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/rco/dpaper/404.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

I'll Try That, Too - A Field Experiment in Retailing on the Effect of Variety During Display Promotions

Author

Listed:
  • Mareike Sachse

    (HU Berlin)

  • Sebastian Oetzel

    (University of Applied Sciences Fulda)

  • Daniel Klapper

    (HU Berlin)

Abstract

The effect of variety on consumer choice has been studied extensively, with some stream of literature showing the positive effects on choice and others arguing that too many alternatives may result in negative consequences (i.e., choice deferral or no purchase at all), often referred to as choice overload. In a field experiment with a major chocolate brand conducted at a German retail chain, we test for variety during a price and display promotion. Participating stores either include the full variety of products on the display or a reduced selection (low variety). Contrary to the literature on choice overload, we find a significantly positive effect of the display promotion on unit sales, which is stronger for stores with high variety. Further findings show a stronger promotion uplift for less popular products in stores with high variety on the display. This suggests that more variety may increase consumers’ willingness to try new products, when the financial risk is low. We also test for the effect of product distribution on displays by analysing the number of facings. Additionally, we introduce an approach to determine an optimal space allocation of products on the display. Our findings suggest that an even distribution results in the highest profits for the retailer. We contribute to the literature on variety for consumer choices by offering insights from actual purchases with store-level scanner data of display promotions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mareike Sachse & Sebastian Oetzel & Daniel Klapper, 2023. "I'll Try That, Too - A Field Experiment in Retailing on the Effect of Variety During Display Promotions," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 404, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  • Handle: RePEc:rco:dpaper:404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rationality-and-competition.de/wp-content/uploads/discussion_paper/404.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonah Berger & Michaela Draganska & Itamar Simonson, 2007. "The Influence of Product Variety on Brand Perception and Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 460-472, 07-08.
    2. Nitin Mehta & Surendra Rajiv & Kannan Srinivasan, 2003. "Price Uncertainty and Consumer Search: A Structural Model of Consideration Set Formation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 58-84, June.
    3. Garrido-Morgado, Álvaro & González-Benito, Óscar & Martos-Partal, Mercedes & Campo, Katia, 2021. "Which Products are More Responsive to In-Store Displays: Utilitarian or Hedonic?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 477-491.
    4. Han, Yoonju & Chandukala, Sandeep R. & Li, Shibo, 2022. "Impact of different types of in-store displays on consumer purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 432-452.
    5. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    6. Karen M. Stilley & J. Jeffrey Inman & Kirk L. Wakefield, 2010. "Planning to Make Unplanned Purchases? The Role of In-Store Slack in Budget Deviation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 264-278, August.
    7. Radon, Anita & Brannon, Daniel C. & Reardon, James, 2021. "Ketchup with your fries? Utilizing complementary product displays to transfer attention to a focal product," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    8. Roggeveen, Anne L. & Nordfält, Jens & Grewal, Dhruv, 2016. "Do Digital Displays Enhance Sales? Role of Retail Format and Message Content," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 122-131.
    9. William J. Baumol & Edward A. Ide, 1956. "Variety in Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 93-101, October.
    10. Kopalle, Praveen K. & Kannan, P.K. & Boldt, Lin Bao & Arora, Neeraj, 2012. "The impact of household level heterogeneity in reference price effects on optimal retailer pricing policies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 102-114.
    11. Kelvin Lancaster, 1990. "The Economics of Product Variety: A Survey," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 189-206.
    12. Breugelmans, Els & Campo, Katia, 2011. "Effectiveness of In-Store Displays in a Virtual Store Environment," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 75-89.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garrido-Morgado, à lvaro & González-Benito, Óscar, 2024. "Applying the triple coherence line to in-store marketing plans to increase private label market share," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Syam, Siddhartha S. & Bhatnagar, Amit, 2015. "A decision support model for determining the level of product variety with marketing and supply chain considerations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 12-21.
    3. Raza, Ali & Wasim, Manahil & Ishaq, Muhammad Ishtiaq, 2024. "Virtual reality-based product displays to inspire consumers’ purchase intentions: An experimental study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Tom Fangyun Tan & Serguei Netessine & Lorin Hitt, 2017. "Is Tom Cruise Threatened? An Empirical Study of the Impact of Product Variety on Demand Concentration," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 643-660, September.
    5. Spassova, Gerri & Isen, Alice M., 2013. "Positive affect moderates the impact of assortment size on choice satisfaction," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 397-408.
    6. Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer & Markus Blut & Sarah Hong Xiao & Dhruv Grewal, 2020. "Impulse buying: a meta-analytic review," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 384-404, May.
    7. Cristinel Vasiliu & Mihai Ovidiu Cercel, 2015. "Innovation in retail: impact on creating a positive experience when buying fashion products," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(39), pages 583-583, May.
    8. Suren Basov & Svetlana Danilkina & David Prentice, 2020. "When Does Variety Increase with Quality?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 56(3), pages 463-487, May.
    9. Shih-Ping Jeng, 2008. "Effects of corporate reputations, relationships and competing suppliers' marketing programmes on customers' cross-buying intentions," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 15-26, January.
    10. Gabriele Pizzi & Gian Luca Marzocchi, 2020. "Consumer-defined assortments: application of card-sorting to category management," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2020(1), pages 67-84, March.
    11. Qian Tang & Mei Lin & Youngsoo Kim, 2021. "Inter‐Retailer Channel Competition: Empirical Analyses of Store Entry Effects on Online Purchases," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2547-2563, August.
    12. Uzma Mushtaque & Jennifer A. Pazour, 2022. "Assortment optimization under cardinality effects and novelty for unequal profit margin items," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 106-126, February.
    13. Kolias, Georgios D. & Dimelis, Sophia P. & Filios, Vasilios P., 2011. "An empirical analysis of inventory turnover behaviour in Greek retail sector: 2000-2005," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 143-153, September.
    14. Garrett van Ryzin & Siddharth Mahajan, 1999. "On the Relationship Between Inventory Costs and Variety Benefits in Retail Assortments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(11), pages 1496-1509, November.
    15. Caroline Schlinkert & Marleen Gillebaart & Jeroen Benjamins & Maartje P. Poelman & Denise de Ridder, 2020. "Snacks and The City: Unexpected Low Sales of an Easy-Access, Tasty, and Healthy Snack at an Urban Snacking Hotspot," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Grandi, Benedetta & Cardinali, Maria Grazia, 2022. "Colours and price offers: How different price communications can affect sales and customers’ perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Garaus, Marion & Wagner, Udo & Manzinger, Sandra, 2017. "Happy grocery shopper: The creation of positive emotions through affective digital signage content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 295-305.
    18. Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Lorin M. Hitt, 2012. "Information Technology and Trademarks: Implications for Product Variety," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1211-1226, June.
    19. Poncin, Ingrid & Garnier, Marion & Ben Mimoun, Mohammed Slim & Leclercq, Thomas, 2017. "Smart technologies and shopping experience: Are gamification interfaces effective? The case of the Smartstore," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 320-331.
    20. Yan, Huan & Chang, En-Chung & Chou, Ting-Jui & Tang, Xiaofei, 2015. "The over-categorization effect: How the number of categorizations influences shoppers' perceptions of variety and satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 631-638.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    variety; retailing; in-store display; field experiment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rco:dpaper:404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Viviana Lalli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rationality-and-competition.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.