IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/20044.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Supply-Chain Network Analysis of Kyoto's Traditional Craft Industry

Author

Listed:
  • SATO Daisuke
  • IKEDA Yuichi
  • KAWAI Shuichi
  • Maxmilian SCHICH

Abstract

In recent years, due to changes in consumer demand, accompanied by generational transformations, the traditional craft industry in Kyoto has lost substantial sales revenue. In this paper, our goal is to characterize Kyoto's traditional craft industry from the analysis of the supply chain network between individual companies within the Kyoto region. We clarify the community structure, the bow-tie structure, the robustness, and the vulnerability of the supply chain network as keys for sustainable growth. From the community detection and bow-tie structure analysis, it is evident that the traditional craft industry still occupies an important position in the industrial network of Kyoto. Furthermore, we have clarified the relationship between the network characteristics of modern and traditional craft industries and their profitability and productivity. It became clear that the traditional craft industry has a different network structure from both the modern consumer game industry and electromechanical industry. Modern industries have a core loop structure in the industrial community. The companies there create high added value and play a role in driving the entire industry. On the other hand, because Nishijin fabric and the Kyoto doll industry don't have a loop structure, the profitability of the industry is declining. This is presumed to be a factor in the decline of the traditional craft industry.

Suggested Citation

  • SATO Daisuke & IKEDA Yuichi & KAWAI Shuichi & Maxmilian SCHICH, 2020. "Supply-Chain Network Analysis of Kyoto's Traditional Craft Industry," Discussion papers 20044, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:20044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/20e044.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhijit Chakraborty & Yuichi Kichikawa & Takashi Iino & Hiroshi Iyetomi & Hiroyasu Inoue & Yoshi Fujiwara & Hideaki Aoyama, 2018. "Hierarchical communities in the walnut structure of the Japanese production network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Giulio Cainelli & Sandro Montresor & Giuseppe Vittucci Marzetti, 2013. "Production and financial linkages in inter-firm networks: structural variety, risk-sharing and resilience," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Esben Sloth Andersen (ed.), Long Term Economic Development, edition 127, pages 113-136, Springer.
    3. Ulrich, Karl, 1995. "The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 419-440, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daisuke Sato & Yuichi Ikeda & Shuichi Kawai & Maxmilian Schich, 2020. "The sustainability and the survivability of Kyoto’s traditional craft industry revealed from supplier-customer network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, November.
    2. KICHIKAWA Yuichi & IINO Takashi & IYETOMI Hiroshi & INOUE Hiroyasu, 2019. "Hierarchical and Circular Flow Structure of the Interfirm Transaction Network in Japan," Discussion papers 19063, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. Sharon Novak & Scott Stern, 2009. "Complementarity Among Vertical Integration Decisions: Evidence from Automobile Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 311-332, February.
    4. Cecere, Grazia & Corrocher, Nicoletta & Battaglia, Riccardo David, 2015. "Innovation and competition in the smartphone industry: Is there a dominant design?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 162-175.
    5. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Stollenwerk, Stephan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-41.
    6. Arman Avadikyan & Patrick Llerena, 2009. "Socio-technical transition processes: A real option based reasoning," Working Papers of BETA 2009-21, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    7. Wallace J. Hopp & Xiaowei Xu, 2005. "Product Line Selection and Pricing with Modularity in Design," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 172-187, August.
    8. Bent Flyvbjerg & Alexander Budzier & Jong Seok Lee & Mark Keil & Daniel Lunn & Dirk W. Bester, 2022. "The Empirical Reality of IT Project Cost Overruns: Discovering A Power-Law Distribution," Papers 2210.01573, arXiv.org.
    9. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Roberto Ganau & Kristina Maslauskaite & Monica Brezzi, 2021. "Credit constraints, labor productivity, and the role of regional institutions: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Europe," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 299-328, March.
    10. Fumihiko Isada, 2021. "An empirical study on inter-organizational network structures for automated vehicles," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Van Assche, Ari, 2008. "Modularity and the organization of international production," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 353-368, August.
    12. Alan MacCormack & John Rusnak & Carliss Y. Baldwin, 2006. "Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1015-1030, July.
    13. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    14. Alessandro Rossi & Alessandro Narduzzo, 2003. "Modular design and the development of complex artifact lesson fron free open source software," Quaderni DISA 080, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 29 Sep 2003.
    15. MacCormack, Alan & Baldwin, Carliss & Rusnak, John, 2012. "Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the “mirroring” hypothesis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1309-1324.
    16. Kaushik Sinha & Seok‐Youn Han & Eun Suk Suh, 2020. "Design structure matrix‐based modularization approach for complex systems with multiple design constraints," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 211-220, March.
    17. Carmen M. Reinhart & Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2008. "Is the 2007 US Sub-prime Financial Crisis So Different? An International Historical Comparison," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(2), pages 339-344, May.
    18. Hancké, Bob & Coulter, Steve, 2013. "The German manufacturing sector unpacked: institutions, policies and future trajectories," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56090, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Uzunca, Bilgehan & Sharapov, Dmitry & Tee, Richard, 2022. "Governance rigidity, industry evolution, and value capture in platform ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    20. Muffatto, Moreno, 1999. "Introducing a platform strategy in product development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 145-153, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:20044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.