IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkpbs/019.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die neue Wohnungsfrage: Gewinner und Verlierer des deutschen Immobilienbooms

Author

Listed:
  • Till Baldenius

    (University of Bonn)

  • Sebastian Kohl

    (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies)

  • Moritz Schularick

    (University of Bonn)

Abstract

Deutschland steht vor einer neuen Wohnungsfrage. Der anhaltende Boom am Immobilienmarkt spaltet die Gesellschaft in Gewinner und Verlierer. Auf der einen Seite haben die Preissteigerungen seit 2011 deutsche Immobilienbesitzer um etwa 3 Billionen Euro reicher gemacht. Diese Vermögenzuwächse entsprechen in etwa dem deutschen Bruttoinlandsprodukt eines Jahres und übersteigen die gesamte deutsche Staatverschuldung um gut eine Billion Euro. Mehr als die Hälfte der Kapitalgewinne entfiel auf die reichsten 10% der Deutschen, aber auch Haushalte der oberen Mittelschicht (80stes Perzentil) haben stark profitiert. Ihr Vermögen ist durch den Boom um etwa 50% auf 380.000 Euro gestiegen. Städtische Mieterhaushalte mit geringem Einkommen sind die großen Verlierer des Booms. In den Städten sind die Mieten im letzten Jahrzehnt dort am stärksten gewachsen, wo einkommensschwache Haushalte leben („Gentrifizierung“). Obwohl steigende Mieten zeigen, dass das zu geringe Angebot von Wohnraum und nicht das niedrige Zinsumfeld den Boom am Immobilienmarkt treiben, versäumt es Deutschland weiterhin, die niedrigen Zinsen für zusätzliche Investitionen zu nutzen. Unsere Prognose des Wohnungsbedarfs bis 2030 lässt erwarten, dass das soziale Konfliktpotential der neuen Wohnungsfrage weiter zunehmen wird: Im Jahr 2030 werden knapp eine Million Wohnungen fehlen, davon allein 340.000 in den sieben größten Städten.

Suggested Citation

  • Till Baldenius & Sebastian Kohl & Moritz Schularick, 2021. "Die neue Wohnungsfrage: Gewinner und Verlierer des deutschen Immobilienbooms," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 019, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkpbs:019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkpbs/ECONtribute_PB_019_2021.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florian Dorn & Stefanie Gäbler & Björn Kauder & Manuela Krause & Luisa Lorenz & Martin Mosler & Niklas Potrafke & Luisa Dörr, 2018. "The budget composition of the government in Germany," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 95.
    2. Adam, Klaus & Tzamourani, Panagiota, 2016. "Distributional consequences of asset price inflation in the Euro Area," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 172-192.
    3. Niehues, Judith & Voigtländer, Michael, 2016. "Wohneigentumsquote: Geringe Dynamik in der Wohneigentumsbildung," IW-Kurzberichte 22.2016, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    4. Davis, Morris A. & Heathcote, Jonathan, 2007. "The price and quantity of residential land in the United States," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(8), pages 2595-2620, November.
    5. Ermisch, J. F. & Findlay, J. & Gibb, K., 1996. "The Price Elasticity of Housing Demand in Britain: Issues of Sample Selection," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 64-86, March.
    6. Daniel Fernández-Kranz & Mark Hon, 2006. "A Cross-Section Analysis of the Income Elasticity of Housing Demand in Spain: Is There a Real Estate Bubble?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 449-470, June.
    7. Voigtländer, Michael, 2015. "Optionen für bezahlbaren Wohnraum: Ein policy paper in Kooperation mit dem ZIA Deutschland," IW policy papers 14/2015, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    8. Deschermeier, Philipp & Henger, Ralph, 2015. "Die Bedeutung des zukünftigen Kohorteneffekts auf den Wohnflächenkonsum," IW-Trends – Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute, vol. 42(3), pages 23-39.
    9. Claus Michelsen, 2017. "Erwerb von Wohneigentum: Eigenkapitalschwelle für immer mehr Haushalte zu hoch," DIW aktuell 2, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clemens Fuest & Mathias Dolls & Carla Krolage & Florian Neumeier, 2019. "Who Bears the Burden of Real Estate Transfer Taxes? Evidence from the German Housing Market," ifo Working Paper Series 308, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    2. Carla Krolage, 2020. "The Effect of Real Estate Purchase Subsidies on Property Prices," ifo Working Paper Series 333, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    3. Sebastian Dullien & Ekaterina Jürgens & Christoph Paetz & Sebastian Watzka, 2021. "Makroökonomische Auswirkungen eines kreditfinanzierten Investitionsprogramms in Deutschland," IMK Report 168-2021, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    4. Oliver Lerbs & Lena Nobbe, 2021. "Wie wirtschaftlich sind private Investitionen in öffentlich geförderten Mietwohnungsbau? [How profitable is private investment in public rental housing?]," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 7(2), pages 121-144, October.
    5. Beznoska, Martin & Kauder, Björn & Obst, Thomas, 2021. "Investitionen, Humankapital und Wachstumswirkungen öffentlicher Ausgaben," IW policy papers 2/2021, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rappaport, Jordan, 2008. "Consumption amenities and city population density," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 533-552, November.
    2. Rappaport, Jordan, 2008. "A productivity model of city crowdedness," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 715-722, March.
    3. Jordan Rappaport, 2006. "Consumption amenities and city crowdedness," Research Working Paper RWP 06-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    4. Arif Igdeli, 2020. "A Spatial Econometric Analysis on the Determinants of Regional Housing Demand," Bingol University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bingol University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 4(2), pages 145-165, December.
    5. Miles, David & Sefton, James, 2017. "Houses across time and across place," CEPR Discussion Papers 12103, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Thomsen, Stephan L. & Vogt, Daniel & Brausewetter, Lars, 2019. "Wohnungsmarkt und Wohnungspolitik in Deutschland: Situation und Optionen," IZA Standpunkte 97, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Ali Osman Solak & Burhan Kabadayi, 2016. "Bounds Testing Approaches to Housing Demand in Turkey: Is There a Real Estate Bubble?," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(3), pages 1132-1135.
    8. Kanis Saengchote & Voraprapa Nakavachara & Yishuang Xu, 2023. "Capitalising the Network Externalities of New Land Supply in the Metaverse," PIER Discussion Papers 203, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Robert J. Shiller, 2007. "Understanding recent trends in house prices and homeownership," Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, pages 89-123.
    10. Grossmann, Volker & Larin, Benjamin & Löfflad, Hans Torben & Steger, Thomas, 2021. "Distributional consequences of surging housing rents," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    11. Hertrich Markus, 2019. "A Novel Housing Price Misalignment Indicator for Germany," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(4), pages 759-794, December.
    12. Yépez, Carlos A., 2018. "Financial intermediation and real estate prices impact on business cycles: A Bayesian analysis," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 138-160.
    13. Diewert, Erwin & Shimizu, Chihiro, 2015. "Residential Property Price Indices For Tokyo," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(8), pages 1659-1714, December.
    14. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2019. "Monetary Policy and Wealth Inequalities in Great Britain: Assessing the role of unconventional policies for a decade of household data," Papers 1912.09702, arXiv.org.
    15. Schularick, Moritz & Albers, Thilo & Bartels, Charlotte, 2022. "Wealth and its Distribution in Germany, 1895-2018," CEPR Discussion Papers 17269, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Greg Howard & Carl Liebersohn, 2019. "What Explains U.S. House Prices? Regional Income Divergence," 2019 Meeting Papers 1054, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    17. Jonathan Heathcote & Fabrizio Perri, 2018. "Wealth and Volatility," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 85(4), pages 2173-2213.
    18. Rutger-Jan Lange & Coen N. Teulings, 2021. "The option value of vacant land: Don't build when demand for housing is booming," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-022/IV, Tinbergen Institute.
    19. Homburg Stefan, 2014. "Overaccumulation, Public Debt and the Importance of Land," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 15(4), pages 411-435, December.
    20. Kanis Saengchote & Voraprapa Nakavachara & Yishuang Xu, 2023. "Capitalising the Network Externalities of New Land Supply in the Metaverse," Papers 2303.17180, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkpbs:019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECONtribute Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econtribute.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.