IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/recchp/978-3-031-52015-0_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Organizational Learning Versus Individual Learning in the Organization

In: Organizational Learning as Relational Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Geraldo Schwengber

    (Zeppelin University)

Abstract

This chapter critically discusses the existing literature on organizational learning. This critical analysis aims to provide evidence for the argument that, in mainstream literature, organizational learning has been conceptualized mainly in terms of individual learning and as an intra-organizational process. This focus on individual learning led to epistemological and ontological problems, to a paradox of organizational learning (does the organization really learn? Or is it only a metaphor?) and hinders a conceptualization of organizational learning as learning by the organizational entity. The focus on intra-organizational processes led to a view of learning processes that focused mainly on the institutional boundaries of the organization. Although in recent decades the inter-organizational level has been included in the literature debate and has also developed as a distinct stream, there are still problems in shifting the level of analysis of organizational learning to the network (or stakeholder nexus) level. Both the influence of individual learning and the intra-organizational focus hinder a conceptualization of organizational learning as learning in an organization conceptualized as a nexus of stakeholder resources and interests that form a distinct entity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Geraldo Schwengber, 2024. "Organizational Learning Versus Individual Learning in the Organization," Relational Economics and Organization Governance, in: Organizational Learning as Relational Governance, chapter 0, pages 15-32, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:recchp:978-3-031-52015-0_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-52015-0_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:recchp:978-3-031-52015-0_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.