IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ags/usnmfm/233545.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

A General Equilibrium Demand Model for Living Marine Resources: An Application of General Equilibrium and Common Property Resource Theory to the U.S. Seafood Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Fullenbaum, Richard F.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to extend the traditional model of common property resouce exploitation to a more general equilibrium frame of reference, and to examine policy implications in the light of the extended analysis. The most pronounced modification consists of the specification of cross partial price derivatives of demand between the major species of seafood consumed in the United States. The estimation procedure integrates both time series and cross-sectional results in deriving all relevant price and income parameters. The time series analysis employs a technique originated by Powell (26), in which a series of linear expenditure functions--based upon the assumption of the existence of a continuously differentiable additive utility function--is estimated. Seafood is treated as a separate commodity in the budget constraint, and an implicit test of the additivity assumption in this context is devised. The method of estimation involves an iterative technique in which prior restrictions on the system give maximuj likelihood estimators and the same estimates as would be obtained using two-stage least squares. The major purpose of the time series component is to provide a forecasting equation for expenditures on all seafood commodities, which takes into account anticipated budget contraints and expenditures on all other commodities. The major parameters that are derived include b F - the expenditure A coefficient for all seafood, and 1, is equal ;to the following: (1) 3y 5. where X is the marginal utility of income, and y is income. Another related purpose of the time series analysis is to provide a control total for the sum of consumer expenditures for individual species. The aggregate seafood expenditure parameter b I" is 'distributed' across species on the basis of cross sectional income coefficients for individual species which are constrained such that their sum is equal to I;F. The major purpose of the cross-sectional component of the study--in addition to the estimation of individual species income coefficients--is to select a set of twenty-eight independently estimated reliable own and cross price derivatives, from which sixty-four price derivatives are obtained (i.e., eight species, 8x8=64 price derivatives). In order to derive A these demand parameters, the time series parameter y is utilized. The estimates follow directly from tenets of utility maximization. This completes the demand as.pect of the study. On the supply side, species are broken down according to proximity to their universal constraints at maximum sustainable yield. Those species which are at or near MSY are classified as constrained species; those *which are not close to MSY or for which artificial techniques of cultivation have been. developed are classified as unconstrained species. Forecasts of consumption are made under the assumption of perfect elasticity of supply for ail species. Then, as a result of forecasting far enough into the future such that market clea'rance• at MSY is a reasonable assumption for the constrained species, quantity adjustments--equal to the difference between quantity consumed under conditions of perfect elasticity and quantity consumed at MSY--are calculated. Given these quantity adjustments, relative price changes -for the constrained species may be obtained. The conclusion reached is that, within a general equilibrium framework, the rate of price increase due to the imposition of supply constraints is considerably dampened. Furthermore, only slight modifications of the market mechanism are needed in order to prevent excessive entry of capital and labor into fisheries which are being *exploited at maximum sustainable yield : In other words, since the rate of entry of excessive inputs is tied to the rate of change in relative prices, a policy such as a quota, when evaluated within a .general equilibrium framework, will yield .an input combination such that the level of redundant capital and labor is negligible.

Suggested Citation

  • Fullenbaum, Richard F., 1971. "A General Equilibrium Demand Model for Living Marine Resources: An Application of General Equilibrium and Common Property Resource Theory to the U.S. Seafood Sector," File Manuscripts, United States National Marine Fisheries Service, Economic Research Division, number 233545, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:usnmfm:233545
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.233545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/233545/files/us-fisheries-marine-116.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.233545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Copes, Parzival, 1970. "The Backward-Bending Supply Curve Of The Fishing Industry," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 17(1), pages 69-77, February.
    2. Fullenbaum, Richard F & Carlson, Ernest W & Bell, Frederick W, 1971. "Economics of Production from Natural Resources: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(3), pages 483-487, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panayotou, T. & Jetanavanich, S., 1987. "The economics and management of Thai marine fisheries," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 589, April.
    2. B. Rudders, David & Ward, John M., 2015. "Own-price elasticity of open access supply as a long-run measure of fish stock abundance," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 215-226.
    3. Barkley Rosser, J. Jr., 2001. "Complex ecologic-economic dynamics and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 23-37, April.
    4. Schiff, Maurice, 2021. "Low, High and Super Congestion of a Renewable Natural Resource under Autarky and Trade," IZA Discussion Papers 14279, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Mulazzani, Luca & Malorgio, Giulio, 2014. "The external and commercial dimensions of the EU fisheries policy: An institutional approach applied to the whitefish case," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 123-131.
    6. Carl-Erik Schulz, 1996. "Trade policy and ecology," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 8(1), pages 15-38, July.
    7. James A. Brander & M. Scott Taylor, 1997. "International Trade and Open-Access Renewable Resources: The Small Open Economy Case," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 30(3), pages 526-552, August.
    8. Panayotou, Theodore & Jetanavanich, Songpol, 1987. "The economics and management of Thai marine fisheries," Technical Reports 44681, Worldfish Center.
    9. Bulte, Erwin H., 2003. "Open access harvesting of wildlife: the poaching pit and conservation of endangered species," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 27-37, January.
    10. Brander, James A. & Scott Taylor, M., 1997. "International trade between consumer and conservationist countries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 267-297, November.
    11. Damania, Richard & Bulte, Erwin H., 2007. "The economics of wildlife farming and endangered species conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(3-4), pages 461-472, May.
    12. Rosser Jr., J. Barkley, 2010. "Is a transdisciplinary perspective on economic complexity possible?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 3-11, July.
    13. Frey, Gregory E. & Chamberlain, James L. & Prestemon, Jeffrey P., 2018. "The potential for a backward-bending supply curve of non-timber forest products: An empirical case study of wild American ginseng production," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 97-109.
    14. Troy Tassier, 2013. "Handbook of Research on Complexity, by J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. and Edward Elgar," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 39(1), pages 132-133.
    15. Eggert, Håkan, 2006. "Fisheries Economics and 20 years with Marine Resource Economics: A Citation Analysis," Working Papers in Economics 203, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    16. Duncan Knowler, 2002. "A Review of Selected Bioeconomic Models with Environmental Influences in Fisheries," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 163-181, May.
    17. Schiff, Maurice, 2020. "Low, High and Super Congestion of an Open-Access Natural Resource: The Autarky Case," IZA Discussion Papers 13652, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Rosser Jr., J. Barkley, 2007. "The rise and fall of catastrophe theory applications in economics: Was the baby thrown out with the bathwater?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 31(10), pages 3255-3280, October.
    19. James Chamberlain & Christine Small & Michelle Baumflek, 2019. "Sustainable Forest Management for Nontimber Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Staniford, Andrew J., 1988. "The Influence Of The Supply And Demand Characteristics Of Fisheries On The Benefits From Economic Improvement Programs," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 32(1), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:usnmfm:233545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fsngvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.