IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/socchr/v10y2012i1p37-46n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Beliefs Measurement. How a Slightly Different Wording of the Same Question Changes the Story

Author

Listed:
  • Constantin Andreea

    (University of Cologne, GK SOCLIFE, 2 Richard Strauss Str., Room 3.A01, 50931 Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

Slightly different wordings are known to introduce important differences in the way people understand and answer survey questions and, moreover, in the quality of the items (Billiet 1991). This is what may happen also in the case of two wordings used to measure the attitude people express towards the effect of the women’s job on their children. The aim of this study is to assess which of the two almost similar items, assumed to tap this kind of attitudes, produces a better measurement in terms of validity, reliability and overall quality. For this purpose I employ original data and use OLS models as well as SQP analysis. The findings reveal some surprising differences between the two items. This study starts with a short introduction, followed by the description of the method and the presentation of the findings. A short discussion concludes the text, focusing on implications for future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantin Andreea, 2012. "Gender Beliefs Measurement. How a Slightly Different Wording of the Same Question Changes the Story," Social Change Review, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 37-46, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:socchr:v:10:y:2012:i:1:p:37-46:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/scr-2013-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/scr-2013-0010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/scr-2013-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:socchr:v:10:y:2012:i:1:p:37-46:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.