IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gosmin/v33y2017i3p71-94n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodology of assignment of Mineral Deposits of Public Importance proposed by MINATURA2020 Project and results of its pilot testing in the Dolnośląskie Province (SW Poland)

Author

Listed:
  • Kot-Niewiadomska Alicja
  • Lewicka Ewa

    (Ph.D. Eng., The Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland)

  • Galos Krzysztof

    (D.Sc. Eng., Associate Professor of MEERI PAS, The Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland)

  • Burkowicz Anna
  • Kamyk Jarosław
  • Szlugaj Jarosław

    (M.Sc. Eng., The Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

MINATUR A2020 project’s aim is to develop a concept and multi-dimensional methodology of assignment and - in a consequence - of safeguarding the Mineral Deposits of Public Importance (MDoPI) at European (EU), country (CL ) and regional/local level (RL ), in order to ensure their optimal use for future needs of the society. MDoPI assignment methodology proposed within MINATUR A2020 project, was tested within a few EU regions, including Dolnośląskie Province in Poland, where undeveloped deposits were verified. Initially, deposits of 4 selected groups of minerals were tested: magmatic and metamorphic crushed and dimension stone (144 deposits), feldspar raw materials (6 deposits), kaolin (11 deposits), and glass sand (7 deposits). In the following step, the deposits of the highest or medium class of geological features were chosen, i.e. 73 mineral deposits with indicated and/or measured resources, including: 50 deposits of magmatic and metamorphic crushed and dimension stone, 6 deposits of feldspar raw materials, 10 deposits of kaolin and 7 deposits of glass sand. Finally, according to assumed MDoPI methodology, 10 of 50 tested deposits of crushed and dimension stone were qualified as MDoPI-CL , while another 20 deposits as MDoPI-RL , 5 of 6 deposits of feldspar raw materials were ranked as MDoPI-CL , while 1 deposit as MDoPI-RL, 2 of 10 kaolin deposits were categorised as MDoPI-CL , while the remaining 8 deposits MDoPI-RL , and all of 7 tested deposits of glass sand were qualified as MDoPI-RL . In total, from among 73 verified deposits, 17 deposits were proposed as MDoPI-CL , whereas 36 deposits were qualified as potential MDoPI-RL . On the basis of performed testing, it can be concluded that the main strength of proposed methodology is the possibility to use multi-criterion methodology containing a number of geological-mining, environmental and spatial factors, giving possibility to categorization of deposits according to their economic importance (EU, country and regional level) for their further safeguarding. Moreover, if legal system of mineral deposits safeguarding is efficiently introduced in Poland, this methodology will be a useful tool for selecting the most valuable mineral deposits that should be protected.

Suggested Citation

  • Kot-Niewiadomska Alicja & Lewicka Ewa & Galos Krzysztof & Burkowicz Anna & Kamyk Jarosław & Szlugaj Jarosław, 2017. "Methodology of assignment of Mineral Deposits of Public Importance proposed by MINATURA2020 Project and results of its pilot testing in the Dolnośląskie Province (SW Poland)," Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi / Mineral Resources Management, Sciendo, vol. 33(3), pages 71-94, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gosmin:v:33:y:2017:i:3:p:71-94:n:10
    DOI: 10.1515/gospo-2017-0040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/gospo-2017-0040
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/gospo-2017-0040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gosmin:v:33:y:2017:i:3:p:71-94:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.