IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/unc/tncjou/44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction to the focused section: COVID-19 and international production

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Enderwick
  • Peter Buckley

Abstract

Concerns regarding the operation of the global economy mean that recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic is unlikely to see a return to the previous globalization wave. We suggest that there is an opportunity to address some of the weaknesses of globalization through a more regionally-based world economy offering a better balance between national and international interests, efficiency and resilience in global supply chains, and between growth, inclusiveness, and equity impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Enderwick & Peter Buckley, . "Introduction to the focused section: COVID-19 and international production," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  • Handle: RePEc:unc:tncjou:44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diaeia2020d2a5_en.pdf?repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 2004. "The World Economy," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 190(1), pages 8-32, October.
    2. Menzie D. Chinn & Robert W. Fairlie, 2007. "The determinants of the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 59(1), pages 16-44, January.
    3. Bruno Casella & Lorenzo Formenti, . "FDI in the digital economy: a shift to asset-light international footprints," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    4. Alan M. Rugman & Alain Verbeke, 2005. "A Perspective on Regional and Global Strategies of Multinational Enterprises," Chapters, in: Analysis of Multinational Strategic Management, chapter 8, pages 104-119, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Peter J. Buckley & Roger Strange & Marcel P. Timmer & Gaaitzen J. de Vries, 2020. "Catching-up in the global factory: Analysis and policy implications," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(2), pages 79-106, June.
    6. Casella, Bruno & Formenti, Lorenzo, 2018. "FDI in the digital economy: a shift to asset-light international footprints," MPRA Paper 95201, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Nicholas Crafts, 2004. "Globalisation and Economic Growth: A Historical Perspective," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 45-58, January.
    8. Quaglietti, Lucia, 2018. "Implications of rising trade tensions for the global economy," Economic Bulletin Boxes, European Central Bank, vol. 3.
    9. Michael A. Witt, 2019. "De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(7), pages 1053-1077, September.
    10. Finbarr Livesey, 2018. "Commentary Unpacking the possibilities of deglobalisation," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(1), pages 177-187.
    11. Liena Kano, 2018. "Global value chain governance: A relational perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(6), pages 684-705, August.
    12. Lloyd Gruber, 2011. "Globalisation with Growth and Equity: can we really have it all?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 629-652.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satish Nambisan & Yadong Luo, 2021. "Toward a loose coupling view of digital globalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1646-1663, October.
    2. Irina G. Vladimirova & Natalia Yu. Konina & Viktor S. Efremov, 2020. "Transnationalization of multinational corporations: Peculiarities and trends," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 70-81, September.
    3. Niraja Srinivasan & Lorraine Eden, 2021. "Going digital multinationals: Navigating economic and social imperatives in a post-pandemic world," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(2), pages 228-243, June.
    4. Olga Petricevic & David J Teece, 2019. "The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1487-1512, December.
    5. Farok J. Contractor, 2022. "The world economy will need even more globalization in the post-pandemic 2021 decade," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 156-171, February.
    6. Shaker A. Zahra & Olga Petricevic & Yadong Luo, 2022. "Toward an action-based view of dynamic capabilities for international business," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 583-600, June.
    7. Godinho, Manuel Mira & Simões, Vítor Corado, 2023. "The Tech Cold War: What can we learn from the most dynamic patent classes?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(6).
    8. Claudia Trentini & Joao de Camargo Mainente & Amelia Santos-Paulino, . "The evolution of digital MNEs: an empirical note," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    9. Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, 2022. "Capitalizing on the uniqueness of international business: Towards a theory of place, space, and organization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 2050-2067, December.
    10. DUMONT, Michel, "undated". "The social consequences of economic globalization," Working Papers 2006025, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    11. Victor Cui & Ilan Vertinsky & Yonggui Wang & Dongsheng Zhou, 2023. "Decoupling in international business: The ‘new’ vulnerability of globalization and MNEs’ response strategies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(8), pages 1562-1576, October.
    12. Edwards, T. Huw, 2010. "Globalisation as a 'good times' phenomenon: A search-based explanation," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 4, pages 1-48.
    13. Cuervo-Cazurra, Alvaro & Pananond, Pavida, 2023. "The rise of emerging market lead firms in global value chains," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. Ietto-Gillies, Grazia & Trentini, Claudia, 2023. "Sectoral structure and the digital era. Conceptual and empirical analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 13-24.
    15. Mihaela ONOFREI & Elena CIGU, 2015. "Regional Economic Sustainable Development In Eu: Trends And Selected Issues," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 2, pages 268-280.
    16. Michel Dumont & Nikolina Stojanovska & Ludo Cuyvers, 2011. "World inequality, globalisation, technology and labour market institutions," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(3), pages 257-272, June.
    17. Satish Nambisan & Shaker A. Zahra & Yadong Luo, 2019. "Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1464-1486, December.
    18. Oscar Bajo-Rubio, 2022. "Exports and long-run growth: The case of Spain, 1850-2020," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 1314-1337, December.
    19. Alain Verbeke & Régis Coeurderoy & Tanja Matt, 2018. "The future of international business research on corporate globalization that never was…," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(9), pages 1101-1112, December.
    20. Samuel Standaert & Stijn Ronsse & Benjamin Vandermarliere, 2014. "Historical trade integration: Globalization and the distance puzzle in the long 20th century," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 14/897, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unc:tncjou:44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kumi Endo (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/unctach.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.