IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raaexx/v29y2022i5p1156-1174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choice of performance measures for bonus plan: implications for firm performance and promotions

Author

Listed:
  • Dipankar Ghosh
  • Jong-Yu Paula Hao
  • Joanna L.Y. Ho
  • Hiroshi Miya

Abstract

In this study, we examine the impact of a change in the bonus-based incentives on firm performance and promotions. We use both a proprietary dataset and a field-based survey of a leading bakery chain in Japan that changed its bonus determination from focusing on nonfinancial measures to financial measures. We find that firm performance declines under the new bonus plan due to a misalignment between the choice of performance measures and the bakery’s customer-focused strategy. Moreover, supervisors consider performance measures other than what is intended by the firm for promotions i.e., financial measures) when they perceive these measures to be underweighted from the perspective of temporal alignment of the incentive system. This study contributes to prior literature by documenting the impact of a change in bonus plan on firm performance and promotions decisions, where empirical evidence is limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Dipankar Ghosh & Jong-Yu Paula Hao & Joanna L.Y. Ho & Hiroshi Miya, 2022. "Choice of performance measures for bonus plan: implications for firm performance and promotions," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 1156-1174, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1156-1174
    DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2020.1816186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/16081625.2020.1816186
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/16081625.2020.1816186?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1156-1174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raae20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.