IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/marpmg/v45y2018i5p567-584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A connectivity reliability-cost approach for path selection in the maritime transportation of China’s crude oil imports

Author

Listed:
  • Shuang Wang
  • Dong Yang
  • Jing Lu

Abstract

The focus of this paper is the selection of paths for the maritime transportation of crude oil. In addition to transportation cost, the nodes in a maritime transportation network are always affected by extreme events. Therefore, connectivity reliability must be considered during path selection. In this paper, uncertainty variables are introduced to describe the connectivity reliability of nodes under the influence of extreme events, and an uncertain bi-objective programming model with connectivity reliability maximization and transportation cost minimization as objectives is established for path selection. China’s maritime transportation network for crude oil imports is used as a case study to validate the model, the effects of variations in the model parameters on path selection, transportation cost and connectivity reliability are discussed in the case study. The research results provide a basis on which for government decision makers to better plan crude oil transportation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuang Wang & Dong Yang & Jing Lu, 2018. "A connectivity reliability-cost approach for path selection in the maritime transportation of China’s crude oil imports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 567-584, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:45:y:2018:i:5:p:567-584
    DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2018.1445308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2018.1445308
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03088839.2018.1445308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mendez, Alvaro & Alden, Chris, 2019. "China in Panama: from peripheral diplomacy to grand strategy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101599, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Yan, Zhaojin & Xiao, Yijia & Cheng, Liang & Chen, Song & Zhou, Xiao & Ruan, Xiaoguang & Li, Manchun & He, Rong & Ran, Bin, 2020. "Analysis of global marine oil trade based on automatic identification system (AIS) data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Zhou, Yaoming & Wang, Junwei & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2019. "On connectivity of post-earthquake road networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-16.
    4. Ur Rehman, Obaid & Ali, Yousaf, 2021. "Optimality study of China’s crude oil imports through China Pakistan economic corridor using fuzzy TOPSIS and Cost-Benefit analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    5. Wang, Shuang & Jia, Haiying & Lu, Jing & Yang, Dong, 2023. "Crude oil transportation route choices: A connectivity reliability-based approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. Chen, Sai & Zhang, Ming & Ding, Yueting & Nie, Rui, 2020. "Resilience of China's oil import system under external shocks: A system dynamics simulation analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    7. Ryuichi Shibasaki & Satoshi Tanabe & Hironori Kato & Paul Tae-Woo Lee, 2019. "Could Gwadar Port in Pakistan Be a New Gateway? A Network Simulation Approach in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-28, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:45:y:2018:i:5:p:567-584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TMPM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.