IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v17y2005i1p77-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A global robustness measure for input-output projections from ESA and SNA tables

Author

Listed:
  • Reiner Wolff

Abstract

Input-output (interindustry) data are in wide use in empirical research and constitute an integral part of the European System of Accounts (ESA) and of the System of National Accounts (SNA). In a strict sense, however, these data are merely estimates of the true economic relationships. Therefore, we suggest a measure of robustness of input-output projections with respect to errors or changes in the underlying Leontief matrix. Our measure is based on the mathematical theory of norms and characterizes a complete Leontief matrix. Thereby, no assumptions are required on the distribution of the matrix elements. We discuss alternative numerical-computing algorithms and provide useful bounds and approximation formulas. The paper concludes with a large set of empirical sample applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Reiner Wolff, 2005. "A global robustness measure for input-output projections from ESA and SNA tables," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 77-93.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:17:y:2005:i:1:p:77-93
    DOI: 10.1080/09535310500034341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09535310500034341
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09535310500034341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takayama,Akira, 1985. "Mathematical Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521314985, November.
    2. Donald Gilchrist & Larry V. ST Louis, 1999. "Completing Input-Output Tables using Partial Information, with an Application to Canadian Data," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 185-194.
    3. Clopper Almon, 2000. "Product-to-Product Tables via Product-Technology with No Negative Flows," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 27-43.
    4. Hazari, Bharat R, 1970. "Empirical Identification of Key Sectors in the Indian Economy," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 52(3), pages 301-305, August.
    5. Hazari, Bharat R & Krishnamurty, J, 1970. "Employment Implications of India's Industrialization: Analysis in an Input Output Framework," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 52(2), pages 181-186, May.
    6. Rohn, Jiri, 1980. "Input-Output Model with Interval Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(3), pages 767-769, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malcolm Beynon & Max Munday & Annette Roberts, 2005. "Ranking sectors using fuzzy output multipliers," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 237-253.
    2. Umed Temurshoev, 2015. "Uncertainty treatment in input-output analysis," Working Papers 2015-004, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Department of Economics.
    3. Marco Percoco & Geoffrey Hewings & Lanfranco Senn, 2006. "Structural change decomposition through a global sensitivity analysis of input-output models," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 115-131.
    4. João C. Lopes & João Dias & João F. Amaral, 2012. "Assessing economic complexity as interindustry connectedness in nine OECD countries," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 811-827, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustafa K. Mujeri & Mohammad Alauddin, 1994. "Trade and Linkages Using Input-Output Approach: An Empirical Investigation of Bangladesh," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 75-92.
    2. Maćkowiak, Piotr, 2009. "Adaptive Rolling Plans Are Good," MPRA Paper 42043, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ambrus, Attila & Pathak, Parag A., 2011. "Cooperation over finite horizons: A theory and experiments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 500-512.
    4. Gerd Ahlert, 2014. "Neuere Anwendungsfelder der Input-Output-Analyse – Tagungsband – Beiträge zum Input-Output-Workshop 2014 in Osnabrück," GWS Research Report Series 14-2, GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research.
    5. Pablo D. Fajgelbaum & Edouard Schaal, 2020. "Optimal Transport Networks in Spatial Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1411-1452, July.
    6. Paolo Bertoletti & Giorgio Rampa, 2011. "On Marginal Returns and Inferior Inputs," Quaderni di Dipartimento 145, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    7. Amos Golan & Stephen Vogel, 2000. "Estimation of Non-Stationary Social Accounting Matrix Coefficients with Supply-Side Information," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 447-471.
    8. Lozada, Gabriel A., 1996. "Existence of equilibria in exhaustible resource industries Nonconvexities and discrete vs. continuous time," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-3), pages 433-444.
    9. Tarlok Singh, 2016. "On the sectoral linkages and pattern of economic growth in India," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 257-275, April.
    10. Alvarez-Cuadrado, Francisco & Long, Ngo & Poschke, Markus, 2017. "Capital-labor substitution, structural change and growth," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), September.
    11. Ngo Long & Vincent Martinet, 2018. "Combining rights and welfarism: a new approach to intertemporal evaluation of social alternatives," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 50(1), pages 35-64, January.
    12. Crettez, Bertrand & Hayek, Naila & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "When is frugality optimal?," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 65-75.
    13. Fritz, Oliver M. & Sonis, Michael & Hewings, Geoffrey J. D., 1998. "A Miyazawa analysis of interactions between polluting and non-polluting sectors," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 289-305, September.
    14. Munisamy, Gopinath & Roe, Terry L., 1995. "General Equilibrium Analysis of Supply and Factor Returns in U.S. Agriculture, 1949-91," Bulletins 7516, University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center.
    15. Kort, P.M., 1992. "The Effects of Marketable Pollution Permits on the Firm's Optimal Investment Policies," Papers 9242, Tilburg - Center for Economic Research.
    16. Xavier Freixas & Bruno Parigi & Jean-Charles Rochet, 2000. "Systemic risk, interbank relations, and liquidity provision by the central bank," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, pages 611-640.
    17. Anastasios Xepapadeas, 1995. "Managing the international commons: Resource use and pollution control," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 5(4), pages 375-391, June.
    18. Giorgio, 2019. "On Second-Order Optimality Conditions in Smooth Nonlinear Programming Problems," DEM Working Papers Series 171, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    19. Vicent Alcantara & Emilio Padilla, 2002. "Methodological note about the determination of “Key” sectors in final energy consumption: a preliminary approach to the Spanish case," Working Papers wp0205, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    20. Cheng, John Q & Wellman, Michael P, 1998. "The WALRAS Algorithm: A Convergent Distributed Implementation of General Equilibrium Outcomes," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:17:y:2005:i:1:p:77-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.