Author
Abstract
Supporting students to demonstrate critical thinking skills while studying accounting is challenging. Researching how to do this is made more difficult because ‘[t]here is no single, agreed-upon definition of critical thinking within accounting education … ’ [Wolcott, S. K., & Sargent, M. J. 2021. Critical thinking in accounting education: Status and call for action. Journal of Accounting Education, 56, 100731. https://doi-org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100731; p. 2]. Terblanche and De Clercq [2021. A critical thinking competency framework for accounting students. Accounting Education, 30(4), 325–354. https://doi-org/10.1080/09639284.2021.1913614] have proposed a critical thinking competency framework for accounting students (TDC framework) that can be used to support research in this area. This framework involves certain skills and dispositions using terms and language grounded in the critical thinking literature. This study applies the TDC framework to a study of a first-year accounting unit at an Australian university, involving 101 students from five offerings of the unit over three years (2019–2021). Using phenomenography, evidence is provided of students demonstrating critical thinking skills and dispositions at an introductory level. The cognitive skills displayed are Interpretation, Analysis, Evaluation, Making inferences, Explanation, Self-regulation, and Challenge assumptions. The dispositions displayed are Confident in own ability to reason, Inquisitive, and Open-minded about divergent world views. This study used an integrated set of interventions grounded in the scholarship of learning and teaching. It provides evidence about how to support students to demonstrate critical thinking skills while studying accounting at university.
Suggested Citation
M. Turner & M. Tyler, 2023.
"Demonstrating critical thinking in accounting: applying a competency framework,"
Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 713-734, November.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:accted:v:32:y:2023:i:6:p:713-734
DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2022.2105653
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:accted:v:32:y:2023:i:6:p:713-734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAED20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.