IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/presci/v80y2001i4p439-464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

articles: Consumer choice and optimal locations models: Formulations and heuristics

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Serra

    (Dept. of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Trias Fargas, 25-27, Barcelona 08005, Spain)

  • Rosa Colomé

    (Dept. of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Trias Fargas, 25-27, Barcelona 08005, Spain)

Abstract

A new direction of research in competitive location theory incorporates theories of consumer choice behavior in its models. Following this direction, the present article studies the importance of consumer behavior with respect to distance or transportation costs in the optimality of locations obtained by traditional competitive location models. We consider various ways of defining a key parameter in the basic maximum capture model (MAXCAP). This parameter will indicate a number of ways to take distance into account based on several consumer choice behavior theories. The optimal locations and the deviation in demand - captured when the optimal locations of the other models are used instead of the true ones - are computed for each model. We present a metaheuristic based on GRASP and the tabu search procedure to solve all the models. Computational experience and an application to a 55-node network are also presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Serra & Rosa Colomé, 2001. "articles: Consumer choice and optimal locations models: Formulations and heuristics," Papers in Regional Science, Springer;Regional Science Association International, vol. 80(4), pages 439-464.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:presci:v:80:y:2001:i:4:p:439-464
    Note: Received: 12 June 1998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10110/papers/1080004/10800439.pdf
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aboolian, Robert & Berman, Oded & Krass, Dmitry, 2021. "Optimizing facility location and design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 31-43.
    2. Rafael Suárez‐Vega & Dolores R. Santos‐Peñate & Pablo Dorta‐González, 2004. "Competitive Multifacility Location on Networks: the (r∣Xp)‐Medianoid Problem," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 569-588, August.
    3. Blas Pelegrín & Pascual Fernández & María Dolores García Pérez, 2016. "Profit maximization and reduction of the cannibalization effect in chain expansion," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 57-75, November.
    4. Relihan, Lindsay, 2022. "Is online retail killing coffee shops? Estimating the winners and losers of online retail using customer transaction microdata," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117805, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Mayadunne, Sanjaya & Johar, Monica & Saydam, Cem, 2018. "Competitive store closing during an economic downturn," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 162-178.
    6. Gunhak Lee & Morton E. O'Kelly, 2009. "Exploring Locational Equilibria In A Competitive Broadband Access Market: Theoretical Modeling Approach," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(5), pages 953-975, December.
    7. Wuyang Yu, 2019. "A leader-follower model for discrete competitive facility location problem under the partially proportional rule with a threshold," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Giuseppe Bruno & Andrea Genovese, 2012. "A Spatial Interaction Model for the Representation of the Mobility of University Students on the Italian Territory," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 41-57, March.
    9. Rafael Suárez-Vega & Dolores Santos-Peñate & Pablo Dorta-González, 2014. "Location and quality selection for new facilities on a network market," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 52(2), pages 537-560, March.
    10. Ceren Erdin & Halil Emre Akbaş, 2019. "A Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy TOPSIS and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for the Location Selection of Shopping Malls: A Case Study from Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Burcin Bozkaya & Seda Yanik & Selim Balcisoy, 2010. "A GIS-Based Optimization Framework for Competitive Multi-Facility Location-Routing Problem," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 297-320, September.
    12. Pelegrín, Blas & Fernández, Pascual & García Pérez, María Dolores, 2015. "On tie breaking in competitive location under binary customer behavior," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 156-167.
    13. Haase, Knut & Müller, Sven, 2013. "Management of school locations allowing for free school choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 847-855.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Distance; competitive location models; consumer choice behavior; GRASP; tabu;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • R12 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity; Interregional Trade (economic geography)
    • R53 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:presci:v:80:y:2001:i:4:p:439-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.