IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sbr/abstra/v59y2007i1p85-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock Market Reaction and Stock Option Plans: Evidence from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Langmann

Abstract

Stock option plans are probably one of the most controversially discussed compensation elements of the past few years. I look at stock option plans issued by German companies between 1996 and 2002. In addition to a descriptive analysis of 44 launched plans, I perform an event study covering 17 announcements of stock option plan adoptions during this period. The findings show significant positive stock market reactions of around 1% on the day of announcement in the press. Thus, stock option plans appear to be an instrument whose effect outweighs its cost of increasing shareholder value. Significant positive abnormal returns in the weeks preceding the announcements indicate that the timing of stock options coincides with positive market developments just before the adoption of the stock option plans is announced.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Langmann, 2007. "Stock Market Reaction and Stock Option Plans: Evidence from Germany," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 59(1), pages 85-106, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:59:y:2007:i:1:p:85-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.vhb.de/sbr/pdfarchive.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Merz, 2020. "Expensing performance-vested executive stock options: is there underreporting under IFRS 2?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 461-493, April.
    2. Koustubh Kanti Ray, 2016. "Employee stock option plan and firm performance: A quantile regression approach," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(6), pages 152-166, June.
    3. Merz, Alexander, 2017. "What have we learned from SFAS 123r and IFRS 2? A review of existing evidence and future research suggestions," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 14-33.
    4. Carpenter, Jennifer N. & Stanton, Richard & Wallace, Nancy, 2010. "Optimal exercise of executive stock options and implications for firm cost," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 315-337, November.
    5. Ernst Maug & Bernd Albrecht, 2011. "Struktur und Höhe der Vorstandsvergütung: Fakten und Mythen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 63(8), pages 858-881, December.
    6. McSweeney, Brendan, 2009. "The roles of financial asset market failure denial and the economic crisis: Reflections on accounting and financial theories and practices," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(6-7), pages 835-848, August.
    7. David K. Ding & Ya Eem Chea, 2021. "Executive Compensation and Firm Performance in New Zealand: The Role of Employee Stock Option Plans," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Compensation; Event Study; Stock Option;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • J33 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods
    • M52 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sbr:abstra:v:59:y:2007:i:1:p:85-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: sbr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fbmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.