IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v29y2002i5p729-755.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information and Communication Technology Policy in European Cities: A Comparative Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Galit Cohen
  • Peter Nijkamp

Abstract

Information and communication technology (ICT) is widely accepted as a potentially favourable set of instruments, which may improve the welfare and competitiveness of nations and cities. Nowadays, both public and private actors aim to exploit the expected benefits of ICT developments. The authors seek to investigate the potential of ICT use at an urban level and, in particular, to shed more light on various factors that influence urban ICT policies in the public domain. First, a conceptual framework, designed to improve understanding of the driving forces of urban ICT policies, is outlined. It focuses on the way decisionmakers perceive their city, and shape their opinions about ICT; it addresses in particular the way these decisionmakers evaluate the importance of ICT for their city. Next, interviews with urban decisionmakers in different European cities in three countries (Austria, Spain, and the Netherlands) are used to analyse the complex relationship between perceived urban characteristics (for example, nature of problems and urban image), personal attitudes towards ICT, administrative features of the cities concerned, and perceptions of the relevance of ICT to the cities. The authors' main focus is on the identification of a possible systematic relationship between the aforementioned explanatory factors and urban decisionmakers' attitudes towards ICT policies. Understanding the decisionmakers' perceptions is an important step towards grasping the nature and substance of the policy itself, and may explain some of the variance among different cities. Because the ‘urban ICT’ discourse is still relatively new, an open-interview method is used to capture a variety of different views and perceptions on ICT and on the information age in the city. With the aid of qualitative content analysis, the interview results are transformed into a more systematic and comparable form. The results suggest that even interviewees from the same city may have a different understanding of their urban reality whereas, on the other hand, cities with different characteristics may appear to suffer from similar problems. Moreover, the authors found a wide range of attitudes toward ICT and its expected social impacts, although most of the interviewees appeared to be more sceptical than had been expected. The authors identified a clear need for a more thorough investigation of background factors and, therefore an approach originating from the field of artificial intelligence—rough-set analysis—was deployed to offer a more rigorous analysis. This approach helped in the characterisation and understanding of perceptions and attitudes regarding urban policies, problems, and images.

Suggested Citation

  • Galit Cohen & Peter Nijkamp, 2002. "Information and Communication Technology Policy in European Cities: A Comparative Approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 29(5), pages 729-755, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:29:y:2002:i:5:p:729-755
    DOI: 10.1068/b12843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b12843
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b12843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Gibbs & Keith Tanner, 1997. "Information and Communication Technologies and Local Economic Development Policies: The British Case," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(8), pages 765-774.
    2. Cohen, Galit & Salomon, Ilan & Nijkamp, Peter, 0. "Information-communications technologies (ICT) and transport: does knowledge underpin policy?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-2), pages 31-52, February.
    3. Hirotada Kohno & Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot (ed.), 2000. "Regional Cohesion and Competition in the Age of Globalization," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1577, December.
    4. Franco Archibugi, 2000. "Beyond the Welfare State," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Associative Economy, chapter 10, pages 177-183, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Franco Archibugi, 2000. "The Associative Economy," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-59903-1, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Galit Cohen-Blankshtain & Peter Nijkamp & Kees van Montfort, 2004. "Modelling ICT Perceptions and Views of Urban Front-liners," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2647-2667, December.
    2. João Reis & Paula Santo & Nuno Melão, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence Research and Its Contributions to the European Union’s Political Governance: Comparative Study between Member States," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin C. Williams & John Round, 2008. "A Critical Evaluation of Romantic Depictions of the Informal Economy," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 66(3), pages 297-323.
    2. Archibugi, Franco, 2000. "The Programming Approach And The Regional Science: A Critical Reappraisal," ERSA conference papers ersa00p507, European Regional Science Association.
    3. David Law & Murat Genç & John Bryant, 2013. "Trade, Diaspora and Migration to New Zealand," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 582-606, May.
    4. Galit Cohen-Blankshtain & Peter Nijkamp & Kees van Montfort, 2004. "Modelling ICT Perceptions and Views of Urban Front-liners," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2647-2667, December.
    5. Bar-El, Raphael & Parr, John B., 2002. "From metropolis to metropolis-based region: the case of Tel-Aviv," ERSA conference papers ersa02p392, European Regional Science Association.
    6. van Geenhuizen, Marina, 2000. "Information And Communication Technology (Ict) And Regional Development: Distance Is Still Alive!," ERSA conference papers ersa00p371, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Murat Genc & Masood Gheasi & Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot, 2012. "The impact of immigration on international trade: a meta-analysis," Chapters, in: Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot & Mediha Sahin (ed.), Migration Impact Assessment, chapter 9, pages 301-337, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Suminori Tokunaga & Maria Ikegawa, 2019. "Global supply chain, vertical and horizontal agglomerations, and location of final and intermediate goods production sites for Japanese MNFs in East Asia: evidence from the Japanese Electronics and Au," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 911-953, October.
    9. Esteve Mora, F. & Muñoz De Bustillo Llorente, R., 2004. "Mitos y falacias populares en el debate acerca de los sistemas de pensiones/Myths and Fallacies in the Debate About the Future of Pension Systems," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 22, pages 289-316, Agosto.
    10. White, Roger & Tadesse, Bedassa, 2008. "Immigrants, cultural distance and U.S. state-level exports of cultural products," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 331-348, December.
    11. Jacques Poot & Anna Strutt, 2010. "International Trade Agreements and International Migration," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(12), pages 1923-1954, December.
    12. Fernando Salgueiro Perobelli & Eduardo Amaral Haddad & Edson Paulo Domingues, 2009. "Interdependence among the Brazilian States: An Input-Output Approach," Chapters, in: Mahtab A. Farschi & Odile E.M. Janne & Philip McCann (ed.), Technological Change and Mature Industrial Regions, chapter 4, pages 44-63, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. John Bryant & Murat Genc & David Law, 2004. "Trade and Migration to New Zealand," Treasury Working Paper Series 04/18, New Zealand Treasury.
    14. Masood Gheasi & Peter Nijkamp & Piet Rietveld, 2013. "Migration and foreign direct investment: education matters," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 51(1), pages 73-87, August.
    15. Raphael Bar-El & John B. Parr, 2003. "From Metropolis to Metropolis-based Region: The Case of Tel-Aviv," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 113-125, January.
    16. Pedro R. D. Bom & Jenny Ligthart, 2008. "How Productive is Public Capital? A Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 2206, CESifo.
    17. Pedro R.D. Bom & Jenny E. Ligthart, 2009. "How Productive is Public Capital? A Meta-Regression Analysis," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0912, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    18. repec:asg:wpaper:1025 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Hui Zhang & Yuyao Qian & Liying Yu & Zheng Wang, 2020. "Integrated Development of Information Technology and the Real Economy in China Based on Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Suminori Tokunaga & Yuko Akune & Maria Ikegawa, 2021. "Market access, domestic and Japanese supplier access, vertical agglomerations and overseas locations of Japanese food multinational firms in East Asia: comparison of the 1985–1999 and 2000–2009 period," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 1023-1051, October.
    21. Emmanouil Tranos & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "The Death Of Distance Revisited: Cyber-Place, Physical And Relational Proximities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 855-873, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:29:y:2002:i:5:p:729-755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.