IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v56y2024i1p216-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From marketisation to self-determination: Contesting state and market through ‘justice reinvestment’

Author

Listed:
  • Gareth Bryant

    (Discipline of Political Economy, The University of Sydney, Australia)

  • Ben Spies-Butcher

    (Macquarie School of Social Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia)

Abstract

Movements for racial and Indigenous justice are targeting rapidly expanding budget allocations for prisons and police. In Australia, Indigenous Communities are seeking to redirect public money from the criminal justice system to Indigenous-controlled services and infrastructure through ‘justice reinvestment’. This article explores the possibilities and tensions of justice reinvestment as a strategy for exercising Indigenous self-determination in a marketised policy landscape. Focusing on the case of Just Reinvest NSW and the Maranguka initiative in Bourke, we compare justice reinvestment to neoliberal ideas of social investment, exemplified by social impact bonds (SIBs). We identify three tools of marketisation in SIBs – liability budgeting, pricing evidence, and devolution to non-state providers – and analyse how these are being engaged, and contested, by Indigenous Communities through justice reinvestment. While incomplete, we discuss how Indigenous-run justice reinvestment initiatives are creatively using these tools against the settler-colonial, carceral state to claim fiscal resources, develop bureaucratic capacity, and institute territorial governance. We argue that justice reinvestment demonstrates the potential to repurpose the tools of marketisation to create alternative ‘hybrid’ spaces of governance that contest both the state and the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Gareth Bryant & Ben Spies-Butcher, 2024. "From marketisation to self-determination: Contesting state and market through ‘justice reinvestment’," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(1), pages 216-234, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:56:y:2024:i:1:p:216-234
    DOI: 10.1177/0308518X221125797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X221125797
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0308518X221125797?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:56:y:2024:i:1:p:216-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.