IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v12y2024i2p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Online Negative Hotel Reviews and Merchant Response Strategies on Potential Consumers’ Purchase Intentions: A Perceived Trust Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xia Lin
  • Jiali Zhu

Abstract

Based on online negative reviews, the paper explores the influence mechanism of emotional and attributive reviews on potential customers’ purchase intentions. Against the background of online hotel booking, using ability, benevolence, and integrity in perceived trust as intermediary variables, we constructed a two-factor group experiment with 2 (types of online negative reviews) × 5 (merchant response strategies). This study was conducted by randomly recruiting participants from a university, utilizing a questionnaire-based experimental approach. Two hundred fifty valid questionnaires were collected for statistical analysis, including t-test, analysis of variance, and structural equation model. This paper reveals the influence of online negative reviews and merchant response strategies on ability, integrity, and benevolence. It verifies the mechanism of three factors and potential customers’ purchase intention. Concurrently, this study provides crucial inspiration for hotel managers to focus on addressing the service quality issues in the reviews and develop tailored response strategies to enhance customers’ perception and trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Xia Lin & Jiali Zhu, 2024. "The Impact of Online Negative Hotel Reviews and Merchant Response Strategies on Potential Consumers’ Purchase Intentions: A Perceived Trust Perspective," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/download/6756/6467
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/6756
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenlong Liu & Rongrong Ji & Chen (Peter) Nian & Kisang Ryu, 2020. "Identifying the Types and Impact of Service Provider’s Responses to Online Negative Reviews in the Sharing Economy: Evidence from B&Bs in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Yhee, Yerin & Kim, Hyemin & Kim, Jungkeun & Koo, Chulmo, 2023. "Trust in managerial response offsets negative review," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Xueming Luo, 2009. "Quantifying the Long-Term Impact of Negative Word of Mouth on Cash Flows and Stock Prices," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 148-165, 01-02.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    2. Liu, Ya-Fei & Li, Hui & Liang, Sai, 2022. "Any reputation is a good reputation: influence of investor-perceived reputation in restructuring on hospitality firm performance," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Haibing Gao & Huazhong Zhao & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Ya (Lisa) Lin & Lai Wei, 2020. "Social Promotion: A Creative Promotional Framework on Consumers’ Social Network Value," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(12), pages 2661-2678, December.
    4. East, Robert & Uncles, Mark D. & Romaniuk, Jenni & Hand, Chris, 2014. "The decay of positive and negative word of mouth after product experience," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 350-355.
    5. Nguyen, Cathy & Romaniuk, Jenni, 2013. "Factors moderating the impact of word of mouth for TV and film broadcasts," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 25-29.
    6. Yuangao Chen & Shuiqing Yang & Zhoujing Wang, 2016. "Service cooperation and marketing strategies of infomediary and online retailer with eWOM effect," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 109-118, June.
    7. José Alberto Martínez-González & Eduardo Parra-López & Almudena Barrientos-Báez, 2021. "Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Tirunillai, S. & Tellis, G.J., 2011. "Does Online Chatter Really Matter? Dynamics of User-Generated Content and Stock Performance," ERIM Report Series Research in Management 25817, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    9. Antioco, Michael & Coussement, Kristof, 2018. "Misreading of consumer dissatisfaction in online product reviews: Writing style as a cause for bias," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 301-310.
    10. Evgeni Stanimirov & Vladimir Jechev, 2013. "Consumer Orientation as a Factor for Satisfying the Clients," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 56-89.
    11. Hsu, Liwu & Lawrence, Benjamin, 2016. "The role of social media and brand equity during a product recall crisis: A shareholder value perspective," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 59-77.
    12. Xueming Luo & Michelle Andrews & Zheng Fang & Chee Wei Phang, 2014. "Mobile Targeting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(7), pages 1738-1756, July.
    13. Seshadri Tirunillai & Gerard J. Tellis, 2012. "Does Chatter Really Matter? Dynamics of User-Generated Content and Stock Performance," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 198-215, March.
    14. Kim, Junghyun & Park, Taehoon, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility (CSR) saves a company: The role of gratitude in buffering vindictive consumer behavior from product failures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 461-472.
    15. Dalman, M. Deniz & Chatterjee, Subimal & Min, Junhong, 2020. "Negative word of mouth for a failed innovation from higher/lower equity brands: Moderating roles of opinion leadership and consumer testimonials," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-13.
    16. Hansen, Nele & Kupfer, Ann-Kristin & Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, 2018. "Brand crises in the digital age: The short- and long-term effects of social media firestorms on consumers and brands," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 557-574.
    17. Barbara Duffek & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Omar Merlo, 2023. "Why so toxic? A framework for exploring customer toxicity," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(1), pages 122-143, June.
    18. Golmohammadi, Alireza & Mattila, Anna S. & Gauri, Dinesh K., 2020. "Negative online reviews and consumers’ service consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 27-36.
    19. Yen-Yao Wang & Chenhui Guo & Anjana Susarla & Vallabh Sambamurthy, 2021. "Online to Offline: The Impact of Social Media on Offline Sales in the Automobile Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 582-604, June.
    20. Ho, Mia Hsiao-Wen & Chung, Henry F.L. & Kingshott, Russel & Chiu, Chun-Chen, 2020. "Customer engagement, consumption and firm performance in a multi-actor service eco-system: The moderating role of resource integration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 557-566.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.