IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2013y2013i1id352p1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post keynesiánská makroekonomická metodologie a její odlišnosti od hlavního proudu ekonomie

Author

Listed:
  • Jiří Štekláč

Abstract

The pressure on the orthodox mainstream economic theories has increased in hand to hand with application of non-orthodox economic policies during the recently started economic crisis. Thus, after a couple of decades, the economic science once again opens the door for new theories, methodologies and paradigms. This study has three main objectives. The first aim is a general summarization of the cornerstones of the post Keynesian economic methodology. The second aim is a clear demarcation of this heterogeneous theory and neoclassical methodology with ambition to completely alternate this old methodology. And finally, the third aim is to analyze the post Keynesian macroeconomic methodology architecture including its primary scientific method. It is particularly related to the criticism of absence of realism in the neoclassical economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiří Štekláč, 2013. "Post keynesiánská makroekonomická metodologie a její odlišnosti od hlavního proudu ekonomie," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(1), pages 1-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2013:y:2013:i:1:id:352:p:1-18
    DOI: 10.18267/j.e-logos.352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.352.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.e-logos.352.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.e-logos.352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheila C. Dow, 2005. "Axioms and Babylonian thought: a reply," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 385-391.
    2. Sheila C. Dow, 1996. "The Methodology of Macroeconomic Thought," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 933, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Victoria Chick, 2013. "The future is open: on open-system theorising in economics," Chapters, in: Jesper Jespersen & Mogens Ove Madsen (ed.), Teaching Post Keynesian Economics, chapter 3, pages 56-72, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Ioana Negru, 2013. "Revisiting the Concept of Schools of Thought in Economics: The Example of the Austrian School," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 983-1008, October.
    3. Andrew Mearman & Tim Wakeley & Gamila Shoib & Don J. Webber, 2011. "Does Pluralism in Economics Education Make Better Educated, Happier Students? A Qualitative Analysis," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 10(2), pages 50-62.
    4. Andrew Mearman, 2006. "Critical realism in economics and open-systems ontology: A critique," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(1), pages 47-75.
    5. Bresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos, 2015. "After the demise of neoliberalism but not of conservatism, a third developmentalism?," Textos para discussão 394, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    6. Sheila C. Dow, 1999. "Post Keynesianism and Critical Realism: What Is the Connection?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 15-33, September.
    7. Paolo Ramazzotti, 2012. "Social costs and normative economics," Working Papers 66-2012, Macerata University, Department of Finance and Economic Sciences, revised Sep 2015.
    8. Fontana, Giuseppe & Gerrard, Bill, 2004. "A Post Keynesian theory of decision making under uncertainty," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 619-637, October.
    9. Marco Crocco, 2002. "The concept of degrees of uncertainty in Keynes, Shackle, and Davidson," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 12(2), pages 11-28, July-Dece.
    10. Jan Toporowski, 2007. "On rhetoric and being realistic about the monetary policy of developing countries," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 47-55.
    11. Andrew Mearman, 2002. "To What Extent Is Veblen an Open-Systems Theorist?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 573-580, June.
    12. Alvaro Cencini, 2012. "Towards a macroeconomic approach to macroeconomics," Chapters, in: Claude Gnos & Sergio Rossi (ed.), Modern Monetary Macroeconomics, chapter 2, pages 39-68, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Pedro Garcia Duarte, 2012. "Not Going Away? Microfoundations in the Making of a New Consensus in Macroeconomics," Chapters, in: Microfoundations Reconsidered, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Jamie Morgan, 2021. "Learning to Treat Our Natural World Realistically Through Unlearning Mainstream Economics? A Commentary on the Recent Work of Peter Söderbaum," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 10(1), pages 14-31, July.
    15. Vincent Vernay, 2012. "Labor Market and Monetary Macroeconomics," Chapters, in: Claude Gnos & Louis-Philippe Rochon & Domenica Tropeano (ed.), Employment, Growth and Development, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. David Dequech, 2008. "Varieties of uncertainty: a survey of the economic literature," Anais do XXXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 36th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 200807211223070, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    17. Lo, Alex, 2014. "The Problem of Methodological Pluralism in Ecological Economics," MPRA Paper 49543, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Jamie Morgan, 2015. "Is Economics Responding to Critique? What do the UK 2015 QAA Subject Benchmarks Indicate?," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 518-538, October.
    19. Wagner, Richard E., 2012. "A macro economy as an ecology of plans," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 433-444.
    20. Giuseppe Fontana, 2000. "Post Keynesians and Circuitists on Money and Uncertainty: An Attempt at Generality," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 27-48, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2013:y:2013:i:1:id:352:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.