IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v63y2012i1p107-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real options with synergies: static versus dynamic policies

Author

Listed:
  • M Nishihara

    (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan)

Abstract

We develop a model for determining whether a firm should exercise two real options individually or simultaneously. The simultaneous exercise of both options has synergy of cost savings, while the separate exercise of each option benefits from project flexibility. This trade-off determines the optimal exercise policy. We compare static and dynamic management of multiple real options. A firm under static management determines the type of exercise of real options ex ante; on the other hand, a firm under dynamic management makes the decision at the time of exercise. We show that highly correlated projects increase the option values under both styles of management because a firm is more likely to enjoy the synergy gains of joint investment. We also highlight the advantage of dynamic management over static management for weakly correlated projects.

Suggested Citation

  • M Nishihara, 2012. "Real options with synergies: static versus dynamic policies," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 63(1), pages 107-121, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:63:y:2012:i:1:p:107-121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v63/n1/pdf/jors20115a.pdf
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/v63/n1/full/jors20115a.html
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michi Nishihara, 2017. "Valuation of an R&D project with three types of uncertainty," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 17-15, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    2. Andrejs Čirjevskis, 2021. "Valuing Dynamic Capabilities-Based Synergies with Real Options," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Alcino Azevedo & Dean Paxson, 2018. "Rivalry and uncertainty in complementary investments with dynamic market sharing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 319-355, December.
    4. Michi Nishihara, 2012. "Real option valuation of abandoned farmland," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 188-192, November.
    5. Michi Nishihara, 2018. "Valuation of an R&D project with three types of uncertainty," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(1), pages 93-113, June.
    6. Nishihara, Michi, 2014. "Preemptive investment game with alternative projects," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 124-135.
    7. Wenbo Shi & Tianke Feng, 2016. "Examining supply contracts under cost and demand uncertainties from supplier’s perspective: a real options approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 83-97, January.
    8. Nishihara, Michi, 2012. "Real option valuation of abandoned farmland," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 188-192.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:63:y:2012:i:1:p:107-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.