IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/ijodag/v16y2019i4d10.1057_s41310-019-00066-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new model for effective and efficient open government data

Author

Listed:
  • Zamil S. Alzamil

    (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
    Majmaah University)

  • Miklos A. Vasarhelyi

    (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey)

Abstract

Open government data (OGD) is attracting stakeholders from different backgrounds. The call for OGD has been especially pronounced in the last 6 or 7 years. OGD demand accelerated after the launch of the US OGD initiative portal in 2009, followed by the UK in 2010. Before that, the availability and accessibility of government data were limited to certain executives and few government employees, whereas for others, it was either partially available or completely unavailable. Publishing government data, thereby making it available to the public, could be useful in many ways such as increasing transparency and accountability in governments, increasing overall efficiency and performance, encouraging publics’ engagement, and achieving trust and reputation. As an example of the role that OGD may provide, this paper compares the different financial reporting and auditing systems in the public sector between Brazil and Saudi Arabia. Also, the paper examines OGD initiatives among different countries with the focus of the Republic of Brazil and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s open data portals. Moreover, it assesses the level of data transparency based on the definition of the open data model, and more importantly, the paper suggests new dimensions to the open data concept when utilized by governments. In addition, it argues that the OGD in Saudi Arabia, which is an emerging initiative in a country that has centralized power, could be improved dramatically. We demonstrate by using a sample of procurement contracts data taken from the Council of Saudi Chambers Web site, which is publicly available and shows the potential of monitoring or auditing public spending.

Suggested Citation

  • Zamil S. Alzamil & Miklos A. Vasarhelyi, 2019. "A new model for effective and efficient open government data," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 174-187, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:16:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1057_s41310-019-00066-w
    DOI: 10.1057/s41310-019-00066-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41310-019-00066-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41310-019-00066-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andersen, Thomas Barnebeck, 2009. "E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 201-210, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim Mutambik & John Lee & Abdullah Almuqrin & Justin Zuopeng Zhang, 2023. "Transitioning to Smart Cities in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: The Role of Leadership and Organisational Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Deniz Appelbaum, 2019. "Commentary on this special issue of Advances in Audit Analytics," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 161-162, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:zbw:bofitp:2013_009 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Lihua Wang & Xin(Robert) Luo & M. Peter Jurkat, 2022. "Understanding Inconsistent Corruption Control through E-government Participation: Updated Evidence from a Cross-Country Investigation," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 979-1006, September.
    3. Ayse Yigit Sakar & Evren Ayranci, 2014. "Attitudes towards e-Bookkeeping in Turkey: Initial Research," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 52-66, January.
    4. Rajeev K. Goel & James W. Saunoris, 2017. "Forms of government decentralization and institutional quality: evidence from a large sample of nations," Chapters, in: Naoyuki Yoshino & Peter J. Morgan (ed.), Central and Local Government Relations in Asia, chapter 12, pages 395-420, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Sohag, Kazi & Riad Shams, S.M. & Darusalam, Darusalam & Devalle, Alain, 2021. "Information digitalisation and local institutional agility: evidence from ASEAN countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Ali Acaravci & Seyfettin Artan & Pinar Hayaloglu & Sinan Erdogan, 2023. "Economic and Institutional Determinants of Corruption: The Case of Developed and Developing Countries," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 47(1), pages 207-231, March.
    7. Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2014. "Whistleblower laws and exposed corruption in the United States," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(20), pages 2331-2341, July.
    8. Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Hummera Saleem & Muhammad Bilal Khan, 2021. "Impact of Internet Adoption and Mobile Phone Penetration on Corruption: Evidence from Selected Asia-Paciï¬ c Countries," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(4), pages 906-920, August.
    9. Veronika Linhartová, 2019. "Curbing Corruption in the Public Sector by Utilizing Electronic Public Administration," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(4), pages 1039-1048.
    10. Singh, Sunny Kumar & Bhattacharya, Kaushik, 2017. "Does easy availability of cash affect corruption? Evidence from a panel of countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 236-247.
    11. Emery, Thomas & Mélon, Lela & Spruk, Rok, 2023. "Does e-procurement matter for economic growth? Subnational evidence from Australia," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 318-334.
    12. Romero-Martínez, Ana M. & García-Muiña, Fernando E., 2021. "Digitalization level, corruptive practices, and location choice in the hotel industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 176-185.
    13. Jan Hunady, 2017. "Individual and institutional determinants of corruption in the EU countries: the problem of its tolerance," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 34(1), pages 139-157, April.
    14. Liliana Proskuryakova & Gulnara Abdrakhmanova & Hans Pitlik, 2013. "Public sector e-innovations. E-government and its impact on corruption," HSE Working papers WP BRP 04/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    15. Adam, Isabelle & Fazekas, Mihály, 2021. "Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    16. Tofail Alam & Muhammad Aftab & Zaheer Abbas & Kamoliddin Mannonov Murodjon Ugli & Syed Asad Abbas Bokhari, 2023. "Impact of E-Government Initiatives to Combat Corruption Mediating by Behavioral Intention: A Quantitative Analysis from Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Kanyam, Daniel A. & Kostandini, Genti & Ferreira, Susana, 2017. "The Mobile Phone Revolution: Have Mobile Phones and the Internet Reduced Corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 271-284.
    18. Gustavo de Oliveira Almeida & Deborah Moraes Zouain, 2016. "E-government Impact on Business and Entrepreneurship in High-, Upper-middle- and Lower-income Countries from 2008 to 2014: A Linear Mixed Model Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(4), pages 743-758, August.
    19. Fazlı YILDIZ, & Ersin Nail SAGDIC, & Guner TUNCER, 2017. "Budgetary Transparency, E-Government And Corruption: New Evidence From Panel Data Approach," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 6(1), pages 1-55, January.
    20. Vu, Khuong & Hartley, Kris, 2018. "Promoting smart cities in developing countries: Policy insights from Vietnam," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 845-859.
    21. Karim Zaouaq, 2020. "Reading the 2019 Court of Auditors Report on the Evaluation of Online Public Services in Morocco [Lecture croisée dans le rapport de la Cour des comptes de 2019 sur l'évaluation des services public," Post-Print hal-02860300, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:ijodag:v:16:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1057_s41310-019-00066-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.