IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indlaw/v50y2021i4p506-531..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Race and Colonialism in the Construction of Labour Markets and Precarity

Author

Listed:
  • Diamond Ashiagbor

Abstract

This article explores the interconnections and continuities between racial inequalities in the contemporary labour market and the legacies of colonialism and racial distinctions woven into the evolution of market economy. It argues that race is embedded in the legal form by which labour is regulated. In its focus on the legal relations between individual subjects, namely, the contract of employment, the dominant legal form for governing work relations, the standard employment relationship, erases from view the broader social and economic structures within which the bilateral relationship exists—that is, the unpaid work of social reproduction and the colonial extraction which make paid work possible. The article identifies a number of ways in which race, racism and the legacies of colonialism are implicated in the evolution of market economy and latterly in the construction of the postwar welfare state and contemporary labour market institutions. First, in the racial capitalism of slavery. Second, in the colonial extraction and commodification of labour power from the global South for the benefit of markets in the global North. Third, in relation to migrant labour and racialised segmentation of the labour market.

Suggested Citation

  • Diamond Ashiagbor, 2021. "Race and Colonialism in the Construction of Labour Markets and Precarity," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 50(4), pages 506-531.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:50:y:2021:i:4:p:506-531.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/indlaw/dwab020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Heiner FECHNER, 2022. "Legal segmentation and early colonialism in sub‐Saharan Africa: Informality and the colonial exploitative legal employment standard," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(4), pages 615-634, December.
    2. Gebrial, Dalia, 2022. "Racial platform capitalism: empire, migration and the making of Uber in London," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115538, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:50:y:2021:i:4:p:506-531.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ilj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.