IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nature/v629y2024i8012d10.1038_s41586-024-07336-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paternal microbiome perturbations impact offspring fitness

Author

Listed:
  • Ayele Argaw-Denboba

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Thomas S. B. Schmidt

    (Structural & Computational Biology Unit)

  • Monica Giacomo

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Bobby Ranjan

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Saravanan Devendran

    (Structural & Computational Biology Unit)

  • Eleonora Mastrorilli

    (Structural & Computational Biology Unit)

  • Catrin T. Lloyd

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Danilo Pugliese

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Violetta Paribeni

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Juliette Dabin

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Alessandra Pisaniello

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Sergio Espinola

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Alvaro Crevenna

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Subhanita Ghosh

    (MRC London Institute for Medical Science (LMS)
    University of Oxford)

  • Neil Humphreys

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Olga Boruc

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

  • Peter Sarkies

    (MRC London Institute for Medical Science (LMS)
    University of Oxford)

  • Michael Zimmermann

    (Structural & Computational Biology Unit)

  • Peer Bork

    (Structural & Computational Biology Unit
    University of Würzburg
    Yonsei University)

  • Jamie A. Hackett

    (Epigenetics & Neurobiology Unit)

Abstract

The gut microbiota operates at the interface of host–environment interactions to influence human homoeostasis and metabolic networks1–4. Environmental factors that unbalance gut microbial ecosystems can therefore shape physiological and disease-associated responses across somatic tissues5–9. However, the systemic impact of the gut microbiome on the germline—and consequently on the F1 offspring it gives rise to—is unexplored10. Here we show that the gut microbiota act as a key interface between paternal preconception environment and intergenerational health in mice. Perturbations to the gut microbiota of prospective fathers increase the probability of their offspring presenting with low birth weight, severe growth restriction and premature mortality. Transmission of disease risk occurs via the germline and is provoked by pervasive gut microbiome perturbations, including non-absorbable antibiotics or osmotic laxatives, but is rescued by restoring the paternal microbiota before conception. This effect is linked with a dynamic response to induced dysbiosis in the male reproductive system, including impaired leptin signalling, altered testicular metabolite profiles and remapped small RNA payloads in sperm. As a result, dysbiotic fathers trigger an elevated risk of in utero placental insufficiency, revealing a placental origin of mammalian intergenerational effects. Our study defines a regulatory ‘gut–germline axis’ in males, which is sensitive to environmental exposures and programmes offspring fitness through impacting placenta function.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayele Argaw-Denboba & Thomas S. B. Schmidt & Monica Giacomo & Bobby Ranjan & Saravanan Devendran & Eleonora Mastrorilli & Catrin T. Lloyd & Danilo Pugliese & Violetta Paribeni & Juliette Dabin & Aless, 2024. "Paternal microbiome perturbations impact offspring fitness," Nature, Nature, vol. 629(8012), pages 652-659, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:629:y:2024:i:8012:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07336-w
    DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07336-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07336-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41586-024-07336-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:629:y:2024:i:8012:d:10.1038_s41586-024-07336-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.